岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9): 2997-3008.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1077CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1077

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

含原生裂隙膨胀土边坡水力响应模型试验研究

胡江1, 2,张妤涵1,李星1, 2,鲁洋3   

  1. 1. 南京水利科学研究院 水灾害防御全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 210029;2. 水利部大坝安全管理中心,江苏 南京 210029; 3. 河海大学 水利水电学院,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-07 接受日期:2026-02-05 出版日期:2026-09-11 发布日期:2026-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 李星,女,1989年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事水利工程健康诊断和监控预警研究。E-mail: xingli@nhri.cn
  • 作者简介:胡江,男,1983年生,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事水工结构安全监控和病害机制研究。E-mail: huj@nhri.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.52179138,No.52579131);黄河水科学研究联合基金(No.U2443232);南京水利科学研究院研究生学位论文基金(No.Yy725001)。

Experimental study on hydraulic response model of an expansive soil slope with inherent fissures

HU Jiang1, 2, ZHANG Yu-han1, LI Xing1, 2, LU Yang3   

  1. 1. The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China; 2. Dam Safety Management Center of Ministry of Water Resources, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China; 3. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2025-10-07 Accepted:2026-02-05 Online:2026-09-11 Published:2026-09-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52179138, 52579131), the Joint Fund for Scientific Research of Yellow River (U2443232) and the Postgraduate Thesis Fund of Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute (Yy725001).

摘要: 深挖方膨胀土渠道边坡稳定性受地下水位变化、干湿循环及原生裂隙共同影响。为此,开展了含原生裂隙边坡的水力响应模型试验,设置左侧含裂隙、右侧无裂隙作为对照,共模拟了4次干湿循环、地下水位变化及一次长历时降雨。结果表明:(1)裂隙改变了水分分布,左侧含水率空间差异显著,右侧在长期降雨后趋于均匀;(2)深层土体孔隙水压力受地下水位控制,含裂隙侧边坡响应更强;(3)左侧边坡深层土体基质吸力表现出与仅存在干湿循环作用时不同的响应模式;(4)基质吸力随干湿循环次数增加而不断衰减,导致土体抗剪强度下降,引发边坡位移加速增长,位移响应存在一定的滞后性。地下水位和原生裂隙的共同作用加剧了边坡的变形破坏。

关键词: 边坡, 膨胀土, 基质吸力, 孔隙水压力, 裂隙, 干湿循环, 地下水

Abstract: The stability of deeply excavated canal slopes in expansive soil is governed by groundwater-level fluctuations, wetting–drying cycles, and inherent fissures. To investigate these effects, a hydraulic response model test was conducted on a slope with inherent fissures. The left side of the slope contained fissures, whereas the right side remained intact for comparison. The experiment included four wetting–drying cycles, groundwater-level variations, and one prolonged rainfall event. The results showed that: 1) fissures altered the water distribution, resulting in pronounced spatial variations in water content on the left side, whereas the right side became more uniform after prolonged rainfall; 2) the pore water pressure in the deep soil was primarily controlled by the groundwater level, and the response was stronger on the left side; 3) the matric suction of the deep soil on the left side exhibited a response pattern different from that induced by wetting–drying cycles alone; 4) matric suction continuously decreased with increasing wetting–drying cycles, reducing shear strength and accelerating slope displacement, with a lag in the displacement response. The combined effects of groundwater-level fluctuations and inherent fissures intensified the deformation and failure of the slope.

Key words: slope, expansive soil, matric suction, pore water pressure, fissures, wetting-drying cycle, groundwater

中图分类号: TV32+1
[1] 邓志平, 余厚沅, 兰鹏, 潘敏, 孟京京, 蒋水华. 库岸边坡随机场数字图像与时序环境荷载混合深度学习及时变可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 3276-3286.
[2] 王贺, 邓清洋, 程钰, 汪晓, 陈李洁. 酸性干湿循环下固化铅锌红黏土耐久及浸出性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 2966-2982.
[3] 申奉歧, 邱文亮, 齐琳, 邢明明, 陈胜. 多场耦合作用下裂隙岩体冻胀压力数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2866-2879.
[4] 钟庆云, 黄震, 吴云, 林键, 潘锐, 古启雄, 张小军. 水-热循环作用下红层软岩裂隙扩展演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2581-2597.
[5] 谢明星, 贾良天, 孙涵, 崔岚, 解晓伟, 郑俊杰. 粒化高炉矿渣、粉煤灰及废旧轮胎纺织纤维协同固化膨胀土的力学性能与微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2617-2628.
[6] 顾琳琳, 石婷炎, 王振, 马林建, 王建平, 叶冠林. 细粒含量对珊瑚砂混合料液化特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2638-2652.
[7] 吴如芸, 陈世万, 兰旭东, 王璟. 处置温度下北山花岗岩裂隙剪切变形-渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2676-2696.
[8] 朱学亮, 邵帅, 姬羽菲, 张少英, 邵生俊, . 基于多切线技术的三维黄土边坡拟动力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2420-2432.
[9] 张俊, 叶帅华, 崔新壮, . 新型框架预应力T形托定锚加固多级填方边坡地震稳定性实时分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2433-2448.
[10] 石昌鑫, 彭宗桓, 叶祖洋, 李策. 基于三重特征高效融合U²-Net模型的岩石裂隙图像识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2515-2524.
[11] 李铎, 黄磊, 张成, 叶武, 吴丽斌, 张伟丽, 吕利, 葛云峰. 基于点云几何与信号特征的结构面识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2525-2540.
[12] 刘杰, 乔志存, 杨渝南, 黎照, 莫承林, 鲍晓鹏, 蔡铭阳. 改性水泥基磁性浆液及磁注浆突水封堵研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2248-2260.
[13] 孟宇涵, 郑秀坤, 王慧, 徐鹏, 李婷, 杨广庆, 张君, 刘林贵. 地震作用方向对多级加筋边坡水平加速度响应特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2360-2366.
[14] 李玉涛, 周汉, 李丽华, 李泽升, 刘瑛, 李林林. 土工合成材料加筋边坡抗水力冲刷特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 2028-2040.
[15] 董武书, 雍睿, 杜时贵, 李泽, 张小艳, 宋佳敏. 动态CO2溶蚀作用下节理灰岩剪切力学性能及工程应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 2141-2156.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!