岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9): 3170-3186.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1072CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1072

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于响应面法的全风化花岗岩泡沫改良多目标协同优化

路遥1, 2,黄明2,关振长2,张元超1, 2,周麒2,宋珲3,郑金伙4   

  1. 1. 同济大学 土木工程学院,上海 杨浦 200092;2. 福州大学 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350116; 3. 福建第一公路工程集团有限公司,福建 泉州 362123;4. 福建省建筑设计研究院有限公司,福建 福州 350001
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-08 接受日期:2026-02-04 出版日期:2026-09-11 发布日期:2026-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 黄明,男,1983年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学与工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: huangming05@fzu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:路遥,男,1995年生,博士,博士后,主要从事盾构渣土改良及弃渣资源化利用方面的研究。E-mail: yao_lu17806236611@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家级青年人才项目(No.00389335);国家自然科学基金(No.52378392,No.42407220);福建省“雏鹰计划”青年拔尖人才项目(No.00387088);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(No.2026M790483)。

Multi-objective collaborative optimization of foam conditioning for completely weathered granite based on response surface methodology

LU Yao1, 2, HUANG Ming2, GUAN Zhen-chang2, ZHANG Yuan-chao1, 2, ZHOU Qi2, SONG Hui3, ZHENG Jin-huo4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China; 3. Fujian No.1 Highway Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Quanzhou, Fujian 362123, China; 4. Fujian Provincial Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, China
  • Received:2025-10-08 Accepted:2026-02-04 Online:2026-09-11 Published:2026-09-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Program for Young Talents (00389335), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52378392, 42407220), the Foal Eagle Program of Youth Top-notch Talent Project of Fujian Province, China (00387088) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2026M790483).

摘要:

全风化花岗岩因其高细粒含量所呈现的显著黏性,对我国东南沿海地区地铁隧道土压平衡盾构施工构成严峻挑战,易引发刀盘黏附形成泥饼,导致扭矩激增、排渣受阻、掘进效能下降,甚至因摩擦高温致使泥饼干结固化,被迫停机开舱,带来显著的经济与安全风险。泡沫改良是应对此类黏性地层的有效途径。然而,现有方法在全风化花岗岩地层中缺乏对泡沫组分进行系统性优化的鲁棒策略,难以统筹兼顾发泡性能、改良效果与经济性等多重目标,且忽视了多组分泡沫体系中复杂的交互效应。为此,引入响应面法(response surface methodology,简称RSM)与中心复合设计(central composite design,简称CCD),以阴离子表面活性剂a-烯烃磺酸钠(sodium alpha-olefin sulfonate,简称AOS)、非离子表面活性剂烷基糖苷(alkyl polyglucoside,简称APG)、泡沫稳定剂黄原胶(xanthan gum,简称XHG)及无机分散剂六偏磷酸钠(sodium hexametaphosphate,简称SHMP)为自变量,构建了泡沫性能的RSM预测模型。在性能评价方面,发泡能力采用改进罗氏泡沫仪测得的泡沫体积表征;稳定性以泡沫半衰期与5 min消泡率共同表征;对渣土黏附倾向的降低效果,则通过改进的艾德堡锥形拉拔测试仪测量的界面黏附力进行量化。结合期望函数法进行多目标决策,确定了最优复配方案,命名为福岩-1S型泡沫剂(简称FY-1S):AOS、APG、XHG、SHMP质量分数分别为4.18%、1.59%、0.16%、0.95%。室内试验表明,FY-1S型泡沫剂在稳定时长与界面黏附力削减等关键性能上均优于所选用的3种商用泡沫剂。现场工程验证于厦门地铁3号线EPB盾构区间开展,通过对比FY-1S与商用泡沫剂的改良效果,系统评估了渣土性状(界面黏附力、不排水剪切强度、竖向坍落度)与盾构掘进参数(刀盘扭矩、总推力、掘进速度、土舱压力)。结果表明,FY-1S能有效改善渣土和易性,显著降低渣土力学强度、刀盘扭矩与掘进阻力,提升了盾构掘进效率与适应性。

关键词: 全风化花岗岩, 土压平衡盾构, 泡沫改良, 响应面法, 中心复合设计, 期望函数法

Abstract:

Completely decomposed granite exhibits strong cohesiveness because of its high fine-particle content, posing a major challenge to earth pressure balance shield tunneling in metro projects in the southeastern coastal region of China. This material tends to adhere to the cutterhead and form mud cakes, which can sharply increase cutterhead torque, hinder muck discharge, and reduce excavation efficiency. In severe cases, frictional heating may solidify the mud cake, forcing shutdowns for chamber opening and creating substantial economic and safety risks. Foam conditioning is an effective approach for treating such cohesive strata. However, existing studies lack a robust strategy for systematically optimizing foam components for completely decomposed granite strata. As a result, it is difficult to balance multiple objectives, including foaming performance, conditioning effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness. In addition, the complex interaction effects within multicomponent foam systems have often been overlooked. To address this issue, this study employed response surface methodology (RSM) combined with central composite design (CCD) to develop a predictive model for foam performance. The independent variables were the anionic surfactant sodium alpha-olefin sulfonate (AOS), the nonionic surfactant alkyl polyglucoside (APG), the foam stabilizer xanthan gum (XHG), and the inorganic dispersant sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP). In terms of performance evaluation, foaming ability was characterized by the foam volume measured with a modified Ross–Miles foam tester. Foam stability was assessed using both foam half-life and the 5-min defoaming rate. The ability to reduce soil adhesion was quantified by the interfacial adhesion force measured with a modified Yida conical bao pull-off tester. Multi-objective decision-making was performed using the desirability function approach, and the optimal compound formulation was identified as the Fuyan-1S foaming agent (FY-1S), containing mass percentage contents of AOS, APG, XHG and SHMP are 4.18%, 1.59%, 0.16% and 0.95%, respectively. Laboratory tests showed that the FY-1S foaming agent outperformed three selected commercial foaming agents in key properties, particularly stability and reduction of interfacial adhesion. Field engineering validation was conducted in an EPB shield tunneling section of Xiamen Metro Line 3. By comparing the conditioning effects of FY-1S with those of commercial foaming agents, this study systematically evaluated both soil properties, including interfacial adhesion force, undrained shear strength, and vertical slump, and shield tunneling parameters, including cutterhead torque, total thrust, advance rate, and chamber pressure. The results demonstrated that FY-1S effectively improved soil workability and significantly reduced soil mechanical strength, cutterhead torque, and excavation resistance, thereby enhancing shield tunneling efficiency and operational adaptability.

Key words: completely weathered granite, earth pressure balance shield, foam conditioning, response surface methodology, central composite design, desirability function approach

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 贺文昊, 田威, 云伟, 李璐, 赵航宇, 弋郭洋. 响应面法优化靶向激活微生物固化黄土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 659-673.
[2] 段书苏, 候志强, 王志佳, 胡俊, 张友良, 张建经. D-山梨醇对微生物诱导碳酸钙沉积作用效果及加固红黏土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 238-248.
[3] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[4] 侯公羽, 刘云峰, 周光一, 于续楠, 邵耀华, 赵铁林, . 基于响应面法的坚硬顶板弹性岩梁内力与变形的敏感性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3869-3884.
[5] 王修伟, 李树忱, 刘祥坤, 万泽恩, 彭科峰, . 考虑温度效应的盾构刀盘黏附试验及堵塞防治[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2299-2310.
[6] 黄佳佳, 蒋明镜, 王华宁, . 中国南海神狐海域水合物储层井壁稳定可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1505-1516.
[7] 余俊, 郑靖凡, 杨鑫歆, 李东凯. 土压平衡盾构渗流场解析解及喷涌判别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 572-580.
[8] 张淑朝,贺少辉,朱自鹏,李承辉,. 兰州富水砂卵石层土压平衡盾构渣土改良研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 279-286.
[9] 袁艳玲,郭琴琴,周正军,吴震宇,陈建康,姚福海,. 考虑参数相关的高心墙堆石坝材料参数反分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 463-470.
[10] 刘金泉,杨典森,陈卫忠,袁敬强,李长俊,亓宪寅,. 全风化花岗岩突水通道扩展的颗粒起动流速研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1179-1187.
[11] 杨 荷,周 伟,马 刚,李少林,常晓林. 基于响应面法的高堆石坝瞬变-流变参数反演方法[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1697-1705.
[12] 李静萍 ,程勇刚 ,李典庆 ,常晓林 , . 基于多重响应面法的空间变异土坡系统可靠度分析[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 147-155.
[13] 蒋水华 ,李典庆,. 考虑参数空间变异性多层土坡系统可靠度分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 629-633.
[14] 田泽润,李守巨,于 申. 白山抽水蓄能泵站地下厂房的岩体力学参数反演[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 508-513.
[15] 傅方煜 ,郑小瑶 ,吕 庆 ,朱益军,. 基于响应面法的边坡稳定二阶可靠度分析[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3460-3466.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!