岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9): 3261-3275.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0913CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0913

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于随钻参数的岩石抗压强度物理信息神经网络预测模型

吴京戎1, 2,雷俊强1, 3,刘学伟3,刘滨3,周哲4,罗旭峰4   

  1. 1. 湖北工业大学 土木建筑与环境学院,湖北 武汉 430068;2. 湖北工业大学 工程技术学院,湖北 武汉 430068;3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;4. 广西中建融福高速公路有限公司,广西 南宁 530200
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-25 接受日期:2026-01-06 出版日期:2026-09-11 发布日期:2026-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 刘学伟,男,1987年生,博士,副研究员,硕士生导师,主要从事深部软岩大变形失稳过程理论、分析方法与控制技术等方法的研究工作。E-mail: liuxw@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:吴京戎,女,1970年生,硕士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事智能建造、工程管理方向的研究工作。E-mail: 864877562@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.U22A20234);湖北省重点研发计划项目(No.2023BCB121,No.2024DJC002);武汉市知识创新专项(No.2023020201010079)。

A physics-informed neural network model for predicting uniaxial compressive strength of rock based on while-drilling parameters

WU Jing-rong1, 2, LEI Jun-qiang1, 3, LIU Xue-wei3, LIU Bin3, ZHOU Zhe4, LUO Xu-feng4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China; 2. Engineering and Technology College, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 4. Guangxi China Construction Rongfu Expressway Co. Ltd., Nanning, Guangxi 530200, China
  • Received:2025-08-25 Accepted:2026-01-06 Online:2026-09-11 Published:2026-09-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20234), the Hubei Province Key Research and Development Project (2023BCB121, 2024DJC002) and Wuhan Innovation Supporting Projects (2023020201010079).

摘要: 岩石力学参数的准确获取是工程设计的关键,采用随钻技术感知岩石强度已成为主要技术手段之一。现有随钻强度预测模型主要采用物理理论分析或机器学习等单一预测方法,预测结果受现场工况及数据条件影响较大。建立了一个基于随钻参数的岩石抗压强度的物理信息神经网络(physics-informed neural network,简称PINN)预测模型,该模型以CNN-LSTM-Attention融合模型为基础框架,通过将基于多翼切削钻强度预测物理模型转化为约束条件,实现物理与数据融合驱动的岩石抗压强度准确预测。通过构建参数样本,对比分析发现:修正后的物理模型岩石强度预测准确率提高15%,与真实岩石强度的相关系数达到0.97。PINN模型较6种传统神经网络模型测试集强度预测结果的决定系数最小提升2%,平均绝对误差最小减少9%。进一步结合复合岩层实际随钻数据,在顺序为花岗岩、砾岩和砂岩组合岩层时,PINN岩石强度预测平均值误差分别为3.63、4.44、1.19 MPa,百分误差均小于8%,验证了PINN模型对不同岩性地层强度预测具有较好的鲁棒性。研究成果对隧道随钻技术及实时岩体强度自动感知具有一定指导作用。

关键词: 随钻参数, 物理信息神经网络(PINN), 机器学习, 岩石强度, 随钻探测

Abstract: Accurate determination of rock mechanical parameters is crucial for engineering design. While-drilling technology has become one of the primary approaches for assessing rock strength. Existing while-drilling strength prediction models typically rely on a single approach, such as theoretical physical analysis or machine learning. As a result, their predictive performance is highly sensitive to field operating conditions and data quality. This study develops a physics-informed neural network (PINN) model to predict the uniaxial compressive strength of rock from while-drilling parameters. The model is built on a CNN-LSTM-Attention fusion architecture. It achieves accurate prediction of rock uniaxial compressive strength by integrating physical knowledge with data-driven learning. Specifically, the physical model for strength prediction based on multi-wing cutting drilling is transformed into constraint conditions within the network. Based on parameter sample construction and comparative analysis, the modified physical model improves rock strength prediction accuracy by 15%. Its correlation coefficient with the measured rock strength reaches 0.97. Compared with the 6 traditional neural network models, the determination coefficient of the strength prediction results of the PINN model on the test set is increased by at least 2%, and the mean absolute error is reduced by at least 9%. Further validation using actual while-drilling data from composite formations shows that, when the lithological sequence is granite, conglomerate, and sandstone, the average prediction errors of the PINN model are 3.63, 4.44 and 1.19 MPa, respectively. In all cases, the percentage error is less than 8%, demonstrating the model’s strong robustness in predicting the strength of formations with different lithologies. These findings provide practical guidance for tunnel while-drilling technology and the real-time automated characterization of rock mass strength.

Key words: while-drilling parameters, physics-informed neural networks (PINN), machine learning, rock strength, while-drilling detection

中图分类号: TU415
[1] 张宏洋, 罗超帆, 王特, 韩立炜, 丁泽霖, 张先起, 石艳柯. 基于智能优化算法的大坝风险预警模型研究综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 3102-3123.
[2] 张晶, 韩岩松, 周宗红, 刘海, 欧阳治华. 考虑岩石临界围压效应的真三轴Hoek-Brown准则改进[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2337-2346.
[3] 刘德仁, 王凯强, 张延杰, 王帅群, 王宇飞. 基于机器学习的陇西黄土湿陷系数预测及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2235-2247.
[4] 孙嘉豪, 李地元, 解联库. 硬岩矿柱稳定性预测的改进稳健随机森林算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1788-1800.
[5] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[6] 江晓童, 张西文, 吕颖慧, 李仁杰, 江浩, . 机器学习在岩土工程中的应用现状与未来展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[7] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[8] 谭健, 刘学生, 耿艳峰, 付彪, 王洪磊, 许珂, . 防冲钻机钻测智能化试验平台研制及初步应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 673-684.
[9] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[10] 贺隆平, 姚囝, 王其虎, 叶义成, 凌济锁, . 基于自动机器学习的岩爆烈度分级预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[11] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[12] 杨洋, 魏怡童. 基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[13] 邓志兴, 谢康, 李泰灃, 王武斌, 郝哲睿, 李佳珅, . 基于粗颗粒嵌锁点高铁级配碎石振动压实质量控制新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[14] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[15] 蒋明镜, 张卢丰, 韩亮, 姜朋明, . 基于符号回归算法的结构性砂土损伤规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3768-3778.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!