岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9): 3102-3123.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1052CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1052

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于智能优化算法的大坝风险预警模型研究综述

张宏洋1, 2, 3,罗超帆2,王特2,韩立炜2,丁泽霖2,张先起2,石艳柯4   

  1. 1. 华北水利水电大学 科技服务中心,河南 郑州 450046;2. 华北水利水电大学 水利学院,河南 郑州 450046; 3. 黄河古贤水利枢纽有限公司,河南 郑州 450018;4. 华北水利水电大学 土木与交通学院,河南 郑州 450045
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-28 接受日期:2026-04-13 出版日期:2026-09-11 发布日期:2026-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 石艳柯,男,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要从事工程结构防灾减灾研究。E-mail: shiyanke@ncwu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张宏洋,男,1981年生,博士,教授,主要从事水利工程试验及数值模拟等方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhyncwu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.52079051);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(No.21A570001,No.22A570004,No.23A570006)。

A review of dam risk warning models based on intelligent optimization algorithms

ZHANG Hong-yang1, 2, 3, LUO Chao-fan2, WANG Te2, HAN Li-wei2, DING Ze-lin2, ZHANG Xian-qi2, SHI Yan-ke4   

  1. 1. Science and Technology Service Center, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China; 2. College of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China; 3. Yellow River Guxian Water Conservancy Hub Co., Ltd, Zhengzhou, Henan 450018, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering and Communication, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450045, China
  • Received:2025-09-28 Accepted:2026-04-13 Online:2026-09-11 Published:2026-09-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52079051) and the Key Scientific Research Projects of Higher Education Institutions in Henan Province (21A570001, 22A570004, 23A570006).

摘要: 随着高坝大库的广泛建设与运行环境的日益复杂,大坝安全预警面临更高要求,亟需突破传统方法在复杂工况下预测能力不足的瓶颈。围绕风险预警智能评估、预警指标智能拟定以及基于智能优化的风险预警模型3个核心维度,系统梳理了大坝安全智能预警领域的研究进展,深入分析了风险评估从静态阈值判断向多维状态概率量化的跨越趋势,阐述了预警指标从人工经验筛选向数据驱动自动寻优的转变路径,并重点探讨了智能优化算法在解决机器学习与深度学习模型参数敏感及局部最优问题中的关键作用。研究表明,通过融合智能优化策略,能够显著降低对经验参数的依赖,提升模型在复杂非线性环境下的泛化能力与稳定性。研究旨在推动大坝安全预警系统向实时化、精准化与自适应化方向发展,为构建新一代智能化大坝安全预警理论体系提供坚实的理论依据与关键技术支撑。

关键词: 风险预警, 预警指标, 预警模型, 机器学习, 深度学习

Abstract: With the widespread construction of high dams and large reservoirs, together with increasingly complex operating environments, dam safety early warning systems are facing greater demands. There is an urgent need to address the limitations of traditional methods, which often lack predictive capability under complex conditions. This paper systematically reviews recent advances in intelligent dam safety early warning, with a focus on three core aspects: intelligent risk assessment, the intelligent development of early warning indicators, and risk warning models based on intelligent optimization. The study examines the evolution of risk assessment from static threshold-based judgment to multidimensional probabilistic state characterization. It also describes the shift in early warning indicator selection from manual, experience-based screening to data-driven automatic optimization. Furthermore, it highlights the critical role of intelligent optimization algorithms in addressing parameter sensitivity and local optimum problems in machine learning and deep learning models. Research indicates that integrating intelligent optimization strategies can significantly reduce reliance on empirical parameters while improving model generalizability and stability in complex nonlinear environments. This study aims to advance dam safety early warning systems toward real-time, accurate, and adaptive operation, thereby providing a solid theoretical foundation and key technical support for the development of a new generation of intelligent dam safety warning frameworks.

Key words: risk prediction, early warning indicators, early warning models, machine learning, deep learning

中图分类号: TV641
[1] 吴京戎, 雷俊强, 刘学伟, 刘滨, 周哲, 罗旭峰. 基于随钻参数的岩石抗压强度物理信息神经网络预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 3261-3275.
[2] 周立云, 彭平安, 王李管, 孟和, 李金波. 基于多模态时频融合与轻量回归网络的微震P波到时自动拾取方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2851-2865.
[3] 郎浩天, 梁鹏, 王聚贤, 孟凡阳, 卞韵淇, 叶丰恺, 刘洋. 基于深度学习与声发射的岩石拉剪裂纹实时识别模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2838-2850.
[4] 刘德仁, 王凯强, 张延杰, 王帅群, 王宇飞. 基于机器学习的陇西黄土湿陷系数预测及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2235-2247.
[5] 孙嘉豪, 李地元, 解联库. 硬岩矿柱稳定性预测的改进稳健随机森林算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1788-1800.
[6] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[7] 江晓童, 张西文, 吕颖慧, 李仁杰, 江浩, . 机器学习在岩土工程中的应用现状与未来展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[8] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[9] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[10] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[11] 贺隆平, 姚囝, 王其虎, 叶义成, 凌济锁, . 基于自动机器学习的岩爆烈度分级预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[12] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[13] 张文松, 贾磊, 姚荣涵, 孙立, . 基于Self-CGRU模型的地铁基坑周边地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2474-2482.
[14] 杨洋, 魏怡童. 基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[15] 邓志兴, 谢康, 李泰灃, 王武斌, 郝哲睿, 李佳珅, . 基于粗颗粒嵌锁点高铁级配碎石振动压实质量控制新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!