岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 132-140.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2177

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究

李翻翻1, 2,陈卫忠1,雷江1, 2,于洪丹1,马永尚1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-29 修回日期:2019-06-17 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 通讯作者: 陈卫忠,男,1968年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的教学及研究工作。E-mail: wzchen@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:13665699326@sina.cn
  • 作者简介:李翻翻,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事深部巷道围岩常规力学及蠕变力学特性研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51479190);比利时核废料地质处置研究中心合作项目(No. EUR-12-110);中国科学院青年创新促进会资助。

Study of mechanical properties of claystone based on plastic damage

LI Fan-fan1, 2, CHEN Wei-zhong1, LEI Jiang1, 2, YU Hong-dan1, MA Yong-shang1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2018-11-29 Revised:2019-06-17 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51479190), Cooperation Project of the European Underground Research Infrastructure for Disposal of Nuclear Waste in Clay Environment, Mol, Belgium (EUR-12-110) and the Fundation of Youth Innovation Promotion Association.

摘要: 一系列三轴压缩试验表明,黏土岩的力学特性与其应力状态相关。主要表现为:围压越大,黏土岩试样应力峰值越大,且峰值出现得越晚。这是因为高围压试样内部微裂纹闭合趋势更加明显,从而对于微裂纹的发展具有一定的抑制作用。但在软化过程中应力的跌落程度受围压影响不大,这是因为软化过程中,不同围压作用下试样内部的微裂纹均逐渐贯通,并发展成同类型的剪切面,对试样力学性能的削弱大致相同。在试验研究基础上,以微裂纹作为损伤基元,引入受应力状态影响的损伤演化方程(因微裂纹的发展受应力变化影响),建立新的本构模型,通过Abaqus及子程序对新模型进行数值实现。模拟结果与试验结果对比表明,该模型可以有效地描述黏土岩的力学特性。研究成果为黏土岩相关地下工程施工提供了更可靠的理论指导。

关键词: 黏土岩, 软化, 损伤, 数值模拟

Abstract: Demonstrated by a series of triaxial compression tests, the mechanical properties of claystone are related to its stress state. The relationship between them shows that the larger the confining pressure is, the higher the claystone samples’ peak stress is and the later it develops. This is subject to the tendency of microcrack closure within specimens under high confining pressure, suggesting that high confining pressure has certain inhibitory effects on the development of microcracks. Therefore, the peak stress appears in higher magnitude and at a later stage. However, the degree of the stress drop during the softening process is not heavily affected by the variation of confining pressure. The reason is the microcracks within the samples under different confining pressures gradually connect to each other to generate shear planes of similar type, so that the mechanical properties of the specimens are weakened to the same extent. Based on the experimental study, the paper introduces a damage evolution equation considering varying stress states by taking microcrack as the damage element (because the development of microcracks is affected by stress states). Moreover, a new constitutive model is established based on the test results and numerically implemented in Abaqus and its subroutines. Comparisons between the simulation and experimental results demonstrate the model adequacy for effectively describing the mechanical properties of claystone. The study provides theoretical guidance for the engineering construction of underground infrastructure in claystone.

Key words: claystone, softening, damage, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[3] 张宪成, 池宝涛, 于先泽, 郭前建, 袁伟, 张耀明, . 面向近场有限元法的非结构网格划分及其断裂损伤分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 467-476.
[4] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[5] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[6] 王想君, 李英明, 赵光明, 孟祥瑞, 范朝涛, 付强, . 围岩变形作用下考虑杆体屈服和锚固界面滑移的全长锚固锚杆力学解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2687-2702.
[7] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[8] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[9] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[10] 王炳文, 刘臣毅, 康明超, 李乾龙, 杨雷, 周森林, 钱垒. 考虑应力的非闭合裂隙岩体损伤机制及裂纹扩展研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2409-2420.
[11] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[12] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[13] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[14] 张亮亮, 程桦, 姚直书, 王晓健, . 常规三轴压缩条件下岩石蠕变破坏时间预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2011-2022.
[15] 吴嘉园, 王华宁, 宋飞, 胡韬, 蒋明镜, . 考虑能源土软化特性及钻采全过程的井壁稳定半解析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2121-2134.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!