岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 773-780.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0430

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究

刘建民1, 2,邱月3,郭婷婷1, 2,宋文智4,谷川5   

  1. 1. 山东省地震局,山东 济南 250014;2. 山东省地震工程研究院,山东 济南 250021;3. 山东科技大学 矿山灾害预防控制?省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,山东 青岛 266590;4. 上海二十冶建设有限公司,上海 201999;5. 温州大学 建筑与土木工程学院,浙江 温州 325035
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-27 修回日期:2019-08-23 出版日期:2020-03-11 发布日期:2020-05-25
  • 作者简介:刘建民,男,1986年生,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事土动力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51578426,No.51809160);山东省自然科学基金(No.ZR201702160366);山东省地震局重点基金(No.JJ1801);山东省地震局青年基金(No.JJ1806Y);山东科技大学人才引进科研启动基金项目资助(No.2017RCJJ004)。

Comparative experimental study on static shear strength and postcyclic strength of saturated silty clay

LIU Jian-min1, 2, QIU Yue3, GUO Ting-ting1, 2, SONG Wen-zhi4, GU Chuan5   

  1. 1. Shandong Earthquake Agency, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China; 2. Shandong Institute of Earthquake Engineering, Jinan, Shandong 250021, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 4. China MCC20 Group Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 201999, China; 5. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China
  • Received:2019-02-27 Revised:2019-08-23 Online:2020-03-11 Published:2020-05-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578426, 51809160), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation(ZR201702160366), Shandong Earthquake Agency Important Fund Foundation(JJ1801), Shandong Earthquake Agency Youth Fund Foundation(JJ1806Y) and the Scientific Research Foundation of Shandong University of Science and Technology for Recruited Talents(2017RCJJ004).

摘要: 针对黄河下游冲积流域分布的大量粉质黏土,利用动、静三轴仪,研究了试样在振动荷载作用、不同围压、超固结比下的静抗剪强度变化。研究表明:振动荷载作用后,试样呈现出类似超固结土的现象,对比振动前的静抗剪强度发现,当似超固结比小于1.25时,振动对试样的抗剪强度影响较小;当似超固结比大于1.25时,抗剪强度迅速衰化,而破坏孔压比呈现出先减小而后增大的特征。在不同超固结比作用下,对比卸载后相同围压的静抗剪强度可得,超固结比与抗剪强度呈指数增长关系,而似超固结比对抗剪强度的提高要强于超固结比;随着似超固结比、超固结比的增大,试样的抗剪强度比均有所增加,当工程中缺乏动力试验条件时,采用超固结比评价经过动荷载作用的地基强度变化是偏安全的。

关键词: 粉质黏土, 振动荷载, 超固结比, 似超固结比, 孔压, 抗剪强度

Abstract: Based on the large-distributed silty clay in the impact basin of the lower Yellow River, the dynamic triaxial apparatus and the strain controlled triaxial apparatus were conducted to investigate the undrained shear strength of the silty clay after vibration under different confining pressures and over-consolidated ratios. It is shown that the shear behavior of the sample after vibration is similar to that under over-consolidated state. Compared with the shear behavior before vibration, it can be found that the vibration has little influence on the shear strength when the similar over-consolidated ratio (SOCR) is less than 1.25; while SOCR is larger than 1.25, the shear strength of the sample decreases rapidly and the failure pore pressure ratio decreases firstly and then increases. By comparing the shear strength after unloading under the different SOCR and the same confining pressures, it can be concluded that the shear strength increases with the over-consolidated ratio (OCR) by exponential relation. And the increase of the shear strength caused by SOCR is more obvious than OCR. In addition, the shear strength ratio also increases with the increase of the SOCR and the OCR. Therefore, the OCR can be adopted to evaluate the foundation strength after dynamic load if it is difficult to carry out dynamic test in practice.

Key words: silty clay, vibration loading, over-consolidated ratio, similar over-consolidated ratio, pore pressure, shear strength

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[4] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[5] 吴盾, 孙林, 陆建伟, 于秉坤, 蔡国军, . 火壤工程地质原位探测技术研究进展与孔压静力触探应用展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2308-2324.
[6] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[7] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[8] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[9] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[10] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 秦悠, 龙慧, 吴琪, 庄海洋, 陈国兴. 复杂应力路径下饱和珊瑚砂孔压增长与刚度退化的阈值应变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3441-3450.
[13] 唐译, 蔡世兴, 蔡正银. 微生物加固含细粒土砂动孔压模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3187-3196.
[14] 慕焕东, 邓亚虹, 赵勋昌, 何乃楠, 郑龙浩, 何也, . 基于非饱和剪切体变特征的马兰黄土液化评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3197-3207.
[15] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!