岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 1259-1269.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0788

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

结构面粗糙度统计测量最小样本数确定方法

侯钦宽,雍睿,杜时贵,徐敏娜,曹泽敏   

  1. 绍兴文理学院 土木工程学院,浙江 绍兴 312000
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-30 修回日期:2019-07-17 出版日期:2020-04-11 发布日期:2020-07-01
  • 通讯作者: 雍睿,男,1987年生,博士(后),副教授,主要从事岩体结构面力学性质与边坡工程稳定性评价方面的研究工作。 E-mail: yongrui_usx@hotmail.com E-mail:771575689@qq.com
  • 作者简介:侯钦宽,男,1995年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩体结构面力学性质与边坡工程稳定性评价方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41502300,No.41427802);浙江省自然科学基金(No.LQ16D020001)。

Methods of determining the minimum number of samples for statistical measurement of rock joint roughness

HOU Qin-kuan, YONG Rui, DU Shi-gui, XU Min-na, CAO Ze-min   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China
  • Received:2019-04-30 Revised:2019-07-17 Online:2020-04-11 Published:2020-07-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41502300, 41427802) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ16D020001).

摘要: 由于结构面粗糙度具有各质异性、各向异性、非均一性和尺寸效应等特征,结构面粗糙度系数(JRC)取值具有不确定性,工程中广泛采用统计方法来分析结构面粗糙度性质,然而以往研究往往忽略样本数不足对统计结果的影响。针对结构面粗糙度统计测量时无法确定合理样本数的问题,分别提出基于变异系数级比分析及简单随机抽样原理的最小样本数确定方法。以实际工程岩体结构面表面数据为研究对象,对比分析两种方法在系列尺寸下确定的统计测量最小样本数。实例分析表明:小尺寸样本的变异系数(CV)值明显大于大尺寸样本,且CV值随取样尺寸的增大而减小,取样尺寸为10~50 cm的CV值基本稳定在0.31~0.47之间,取样尺寸为60~100 cm的CV值基本稳定在0.21~0.31之间;最小样本数与取样尺寸基本满足幂函数关系,且最小样本数随取样尺寸的增大而减少;系列尺寸下级比分析方法在允许误差为±2%时确定的最小样本数与简单随机抽样原理在最大允许误差为10%、置信度为95%时计算的最小样本数是一致的,相似度大于0.997。该研究方法可为工程岩体中定量获取结构面粗糙度统计测量最小样本数提供依据,保证了JRC(结构面粗糙度系数)统计测量结果的准确性,对工程岩体稳定性评价中结构面力学参数的准确获取具有重要意义。

关键词: 结构面粗糙度系数, 级比分析, 简单随机抽样原理, 最小样本数

Abstract: The rock joint roughness has many characteristics like heterogeneity, anisotropy, nonuniformity and scale effect. In engineering practice, different statistical methods are utilized for analyzing the rock joint roughness due to its uncertainty. However, previous studies often neglected the impact of insufficient samples on statistical results. To solve the problem that reasonable number of samples cannot be determined during the statistical measurement of joint roughness, the methods based on the coefficient of class ratio analysis and the simple random sampling principle are proposed for determining the minimum number of samples (MNS), respectively. In the case study, the MNS of statistical measurements is determined based on the proposed methods. The results of rock joint samples are compared and analyzed with different sample sizes. The results indicate that the coefficient of variation (CV) value of the small samples is significantly larger than that of large ones, and the CV value decreases with the size of samples. The CV values of the joint samples with the sizes of 10?50 cm basically are in a range of 0.31?0.47, and the values for those of 60?100 cm samples are between 0.21?0.31. The relationship between MNS and sample size basically satisfies the power function relationship, and the MNS decreases with the sample size. The MNS determined by the former method with an allowable error of ±2% is consistent with that calculated by the latter with a maximum allowable error of 10% and a confidence level of 95%. The similarity of the results based on these two methods is greater than 0.997. This study can provide basis for quantitatively obtaining the MNS in rock joint roughness statistical measurement, and can ensure the accuracy of JRC statistical analysis. It is of great significance to accurately obtain mechanical parameters of rock joints in rock mass stability evaluation.

Key words: joint roughness coefficient, class ratio analysis, simple random sampling principle, minimum number of samples

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 赵扬锋, 龚政, 王凯兴, 司绪, 刘玉春, 张丽丽, 梁钦锋, . 不同粗糙度岩石界面断层滑移失稳过程电荷感应信号特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3355-3370.
[2] 蒋剑青, 罗敏华, 胡诗红, 柳志灏, . 断续节理产状对砂岩破坏特征影响的真三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3077-3092.
[3] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[4] 熊飞, 刘新荣, 刘文武, 钟祖良, 杨忠平, 王南云, 王浩, 薛熠, . 含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏与失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2516-2531.
[5] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[6] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[7] 杨柳, 吉明秀, 赵艳, 耿振坤, 李思源, 马雄德, 张谦, . 致密砂岩孔隙结构对两相驱替特征及CO2封存效率的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1187-1195.
[8] 于天佑, 蒋关鲁, 饶千竺, 朱丹, 陈虹羽, 刘先峰, . 水汽循环作用下红层泥岩的损伤劣化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 479-491.
[9] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[10] 邓东平, 彭一航, 柳梦琦, 李媛媛. 滑面极径-应力-强度耦合关联下非线性破坏特征边坡稳定性极限平衡分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3235-3258.
[11] 张卫杰, 陈洪鑫, 陈宇, 姬建, . 内摩擦角空间变异性对大型滑坡滑动距离的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3388-3398.
[12] 刘家顺, 周妮, 左建平, 郑智勇, 金佳旭, . 卸围压下弱胶结软岩分数阶蠕变损伤本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2937-2948.
[13] 郭鹏飞, 王戌, 徐飞龙, 孙岩, 刘鑫. 软弱岩体锚杆物理锚固装置参数优化分析及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2961-2970.
[14] 李天国, 唐彬, 程桦, 刘小虎, 侯俊领, 李宏亮, 王晓云, . 锚固条件下煤系地层裂隙岩体蠕变力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3003-3012.
[15] 高晓进, 张震, 黄志增, 蔺星宇, 薛吉胜, 庞立宁, . 深井直覆硬厚顶板侧向破断模式及采动应力响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2450-2461.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!