岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 1270-1278.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0980

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于离心机振动台试验的梯形河谷场地 地震动效应研究

李平1, 2,张宇东1,薄涛2, 3,辜俊儒1,朱胜1   

  1. 1. 防灾科技学院 地质工程学院,河北 三河 065201;2. 中国地震局 工程力学研究所 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080;3. 北京市地震局,北京 100080
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-02 修回日期:2019-07-12 出版日期:2020-04-11 发布日期:2020-07-01
  • 作者简介:李平,男,1981年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程抗震等方面的教学和科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(No.51508096)

Study of ground motion effect of trapezoidal valley site based on centrifuge shaking table test

LI Ping1, 2, ZHANG Yu-dong1, BO Tao2, 3, GU Jun-ru1, ZHU Sheng1   

  1. 1. School of Geological Engineering, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe, Hebei 065201, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China; 3. Beijing Earthquake Agency, Beijing 100080, China
  • Received:2019-06-02 Revised:2019-07-12 Online:2020-04-11 Published:2020-07-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholars of China (51508096).

摘要: 研究河谷场地地震效应对场地选址和抗震设计具有重要的指导意义。基于离心机振动台试验分析,研究了梯形河谷场地地震动响应规律。结果表明:基岩河谷场地对地震动有一定的放大效应,放大效应随着地形的变化而变化,但放大效应不显著,场地不同位置对反应谱的影响较小;基岩?土模型基岩面地震动放大倍数明显增大,不同输入地震动情况下放大倍数不同,各个场点对频段为0.5~2.5 s的地震动有明显的放大作用,对地震动放大频域范围明显加大,这与纯基岩场地的有明显的不同,虽然各个场点的反应谱形状有一定的差别,但是反应谱的平台值和特征周期相差不大;由于河谷场地地形效应,河谷场地地表峰值加速度随着地形的变化放大倍数随之变化,阶地级数越高放大倍数越大,谷底放大倍数最小,随着输入地震动强度的增加,阶地级数越高反应谱的平台值越高,特征周期越大。

关键词: 离心机振动台试验, 河谷场地, 地震动, 抗震设计

Abstract: Studying the seismic effects of valley site has critical guiding significance for site selection and aseismic design. Based on the analysis of centrifuge shaking table tests, the ground motion response pattern of the trapezoidal valley was studied. The results showed that there was a certain amplification effect of ground motion in the bedrock valley site. The amplification effect varied with the change of terrain, but the amplification effect was not significant. Different site locations had a small influence on the response spectrum. In the bedrock-overburden model, an obvious increase of the ground motion magnification was observed at the bedrock surface. Different magnifications were found under different input ground motions. The amplification effect of the ground motion was particularly evident on different sites when the frequency band was in the range of 0.5?2.5 s. In this frequency band, the frequency range of ground motion amplification was increased significantly, which was different from the pure bedrock sites. In the case of the pure bedrock sites, although the shape of the response spectrum was somewhat different for individual sites, the plateau value and characteristic period of the response spectrum were similar. Due to the terrain effect of the valley site, the amplification factors of the peak surface acceleration of the valley site changed with the change of the terrain. The higher the terrace levels of the valley, the greater its magnification, and the amplification of valley bottom was the smallest. With the increase of the input ground motion intensity, the higher the terrace levels, the higher the plateau value, and the greater the characteristic period of the response spectrum.

Key words: centrifuge shaking table test, river valley site, ground motion, aseismic design

中图分类号: TU 417
[1] 余小越, 许明, 谢强, 蔡宇, 刘先珊, 甘峰帆, . SH波在三角形山体地形中的散射与能量分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2639-2649.
[2] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[3] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[4] 何颖, 陈雅, 尹奔驰, 刘中宪, 刘旭, . 频率相关等效线性山谷交错场地多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3280-3288.
[5] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[6] 朱斌, 齐吉琳, 李江, 杨玉生, 张屹蕃, 赵博超, . 基于震害调查的土石坝震陷规律和关键影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 619-630.
[7] 彭文明, 张雪东, 夏勇, . 软弱覆盖层上土石坝动力离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1771-1778.
[8] 闫志晓, 李雨润, 王东升, 王永志, . 覆水砂土场地中桥梁群桩基础地震响应离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 861-872.
[9] 许明, 余小越, 赵元平, 胡家驹, 张潇婷, . 顺倾层状碎裂结构岩质边坡地震动力响应及破坏模式分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 362-372.
[10] 张正哲, 贾科敏, 许成顺, 潘汝江. 倾斜液化场地−桩基−结构体系在近场脉冲与非脉冲地震动下地震响应差异分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3629-3638.
[11] 李小军, 任朋亮, 王玉石, 李再先, 钟康明, 董青, . 不同形状三维凹陷地形场地对地震动影响比较分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3327-3338.
[12] 梁小丛, 陈平山, 刘志军, 王永志, 朱明星, . 离心机振动台模型试验验证的珊瑚礁砂液化判别方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3173-3181.
[13] 李见飞. 抗滑桩加固三维复杂边坡抗震设计的 新方法——拟动力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 275-285.
[14] 安军海, 陶连金, 蒋录珍, . 盾构扩挖地铁车站结构地震反应特性振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1277-1288.
[15] 周泽华, 吕艳, 苏生瑞, 刁钰恒, 王祚鹏, 王剑昆, 赵辉, . 花岗岩质边坡地震动力响应及破坏特征 大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 918-931.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!