岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 1420-1428.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0810

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨

苏杰1,周正华1,李小军1, 2,董青1,李玉萍1,陈柳1   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 交通运输工程学院,江苏 南京 210009;2. 北京工业大学 建筑工程学院,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-06 修回日期:2019-08-26 出版日期:2020-04-11 发布日期:2020-07-02
  • 通讯作者: 李小军,男,1965年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事地震工程、结构工程与防灾减灾工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: beerli@vip.sina.com E-mail:su_ahh@outlook.com
  • 作者简介:苏杰,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事现场测试、岩土地震工程研究方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. U1839202,No. 41374049);国家重点研发计划(No. 2017YFC1500400)。

Discussion on determination of shear wave arrival time based on the polarization effect in downhole method

SU Jie1, ZHOU Zheng-hua1, LI Xiao-jun1, 2, DONG Qing1, LI Yu-ping1, CHEN Liu1   

  1. 1. College of Transportation Science & Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 2. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2019-05-06 Revised:2019-08-26 Online:2020-04-11 Published:2020-07-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1839202, 41374049) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1500400).

摘要: 基于偏振特征的剪切波到时判别在下孔法波速测试中被广泛应用,然而实际测试中时有发现压缩波初动出现反相的现象,因此针对压缩波不偏振而剪切波偏振的理论基础进行论证很有必要。通过三维有限元分析模型模拟了地表敲击下孔法波速测试,并基于时域逐步积分动力有限元方法求解了地表正反向水平敲击下不同深度观测点振动响应。结果表明:地表水平正反向激励下,各深度观测点中与激励方向平行的水平分量中压缩波也出现反相。为进一步探讨这与实际工程的认知相悖的现象,数值模拟了荷载倾斜、探头旋转、探头倾斜等实际测试可能出现的情形。结果显示:荷载倾斜与探头倾斜的综合影响会导致正反向敲击激励下压缩波的初动相位不反相。进一步,提出了一种剪切波旅时计算新方法以减少每次敲击之间敲击角度、探头偏转和倾斜变化带来的影响,数值计算得到基于新方法求解的剪切波速接近模型介质剪切波速值,其优于利用峰-峰法和互相关法确定旅时而得到的波速结果。

关键词: 下孔法, 数值模拟, 偏振效应, S波, P波

Abstract: Polarization effect of shear wave is mainly utilized to obtain shear wave arrival time in downhole method of shear wave velocity test. However, the polarity of the P-wave of received signals is observed to be reversed in in-situ tests. Therefore, it is vital to study the theoretical basis that the P-wave keeps the same polarity while the shear wave changes polarity. A three-dimensional finite element numerical model was established in order to simulate the polarization effect of the downhole method excited by surface forward and reversed hammer strike. The vibration responses under surface excitation at different depths were analyzed by time-domain lumped mass dynamic finite element method with an explicit step-by-step integration. It is shown that both S-waves and P-waves are clearly observed to be 180 degrees phase difference from the horizontal signal traces with the direction of excitation generated by reversed impulse, which is contrary to the practical engineering cognition. In order to find out the reason behind this phenomenon, numerical simulations of three possible scenarios (inclined excitation, geophone deflection and geophone inclination) were carried out. The results indicate that the combined influence of inclined excitation and geophone inclination is the main cause that leads P-wave to keep the same polarity while the shear wave changes polarity. Furthermore, a method based on the time interval during load peak and response peak is proposed to obtain reliable shear wave velocity, which is verified to have a shear wave velocity closer to preset velocity of the model in numerical simulation and better than that from the peak to peak method and cross-correlation method.

Key words: downhole method, numerical simulation, polarization effect, S-wave, P-wave

中图分类号: P 315
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[6] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[7] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[8] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[9] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[10] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[11] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[12] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[13] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[14] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
[15] 马登辉, 韩迅, 蔡正银, 关云飞, . 静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1863-1872.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!