岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1881-1886.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1201

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究

程永辉,胡胜刚,王汉武,张成   

  1. 长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-09 修回日期:2019-11-07 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-08-02
  • 作者简介:程永辉,男,1977年生,硕士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事地基处理及岩土工程加固技术研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(No.CKSF2017017/YT,No.CKSF2015051/YT)。

Study on depth effect of pressuremeter feature parameters in deep buried sand

CHENG Yong-hui, HU Sheng-gang, WANG Han-wu, ZHANG Cheng   

  1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2019-07-09 Revised:2019-11-07 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-08-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Public Welfare Research Institutes (CKSF2017017/YT, CKSF2015051/YT).

摘要: 深埋砂层作为一种散粒结构体系,其原状力学特性的准确测定是岩土工程中的难点问题,旁压试验是一种理想的深层原位测试方法,但在深度效应上缺乏定量评价标准。为解决旁压试验深度效应问题,采用自主研制的物理模型试验系统,模拟深埋砂层的受力状态,通过施加不同的上覆压力 模拟不同深度下的旁压试验,获得了旁压测试指标旁压模量EM、临塑压力Pf与上覆压力 之间的关系,提出了采用临塑压力Pf确定地基承载力特征值fak的修正方法。试验结果表明:旁压试验确实存在深度效应,随着试验深度的增大,上覆压力 相继增大,但旁压模量EM的变化并不明显,临塑压力Pf与上覆压力 呈线性相关关系。为深埋砂层物理力学性质的确定提供参考和依据。

关键词: 深埋砂层, 物理模型试验, 旁压模量, 临塑压力, 深度效应

Abstract: Deep buried sand is a granular structure system, and accurate determination of its original mechanical properties is a difficult problem in geotechnical engineering. Pressuremeter test (PMT) is an ideal in-situ deep-seated testing method for deep buried sand, but there is a lack of quantitative evaluation criteria for the depth effect. In order to solve the problem of depth effect of PMT, a self-developed physical model testing system was applied to simulate the stress state of deep buried sand. By applying different overburden pressures to simulate the PMT at different depths, the variation rules of PMT modulus EM and PMT plastic pressure Pf as a function of overburden pressure are obtained, and a method is suggested to revise the characteristic value of the bearing capacity of foundation fak based on the PMT plastic pressure Pf. The test results show that the depth effect does exist in the PMT. With the increase of test depth, the burial overburden pressure increases, and the change of EM is not obvious. Also, Pf is linearly correlated with . This study provides reference and basis for the determination of physical and mechanical properties of deep buried sand.

Key words: deep buried sand, physical model test, PMT modulus, plastic pressure, depth effect

中图分类号: TU 441
[1] 季慧, 彭宇, 吴则祥, 涂冬媚, . 砂土中吸力筒基础抗拔数值模拟研究: 系泊深度效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2187-2194.
[2] 朱姝, 阙相成, 朱珍德, 朱其志, . 考虑截面规则性的柱状节理岩体变形及强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 213-225.
[3] 钟卫, 张 帅, 贺拿. 基于相对变形方法的桩后土拱模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 315-326.
[4] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 胡雷, . 三峡库区顺层灰岩岸坡劣化−溃屈灾变机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2568-2580.
[5] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
[6] 张全, 黄波林, 郑嘉豪, 赵海林, 冯万里, 陈小婷, . 柱状危岩体压溃式崩塌产生涌浪预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2845-2854.
[7] 徐日庆, 程康, 应宏伟, 林存刚, 梁荣柱, 冯苏阳, . 考虑埋深与剪切效应的基坑卸荷下卧 隧道的形变响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 195-207.
[8] 王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[9] 马显春, 罗 刚, 邓建辉, 上官力, . 陡倾滑面堆积层滑坡抗滑桩锚固深度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 157-168.
[10] 王 进,朱泽奇,陈 健,付晓东,房 强, . 海相沉积软土的自钻式旁压试验及原位力学特性[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 195-202.
[11] 蔡 强,李乾坤,石胜伟,张 勇, . 钢管抗滑短桩受力特性物理模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 679-684.
[12] 金 林,胡新丽,谭福林,何春灿,章 涵,张玉明. 基于红外热成像技术的抗滑桩土拱效应模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2332-2340.
[13] 季宪军,梁 瑛 ,欧国强 ,杨 顺 ,王 钧 ,陆桂红,. 黏性碎屑流坡面运动过程数值模拟与检验[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2402-2408.
[14] 祝廷尉,胡新丽,徐 聪,雍 睿. 嵌岩桩抗滑特性的物理模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 165-172.
[15] 黄锦林 ,张 婷,李嘉琳 , . 库岸滑坡涌浪经验估算方法对比分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 133-140.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!