岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1887-1898.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1448

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

巷道浅层破碎围岩锚注加固承载特性试验研究

潘锐1, 2, 3,程桦1,王雷3, 4,王凤云1, 2,蔡毅1, 2, 曹广勇1,张朋3,张皓杰3   

  1. 1. 安徽建筑大学 建筑结构与地下工程安徽省重点实验室,安徽 合肥 230601;2. 安徽建筑大学 土木工程学院,安徽 合肥 230601; 3. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250061;4. 鲁东大学 土木工程学院,山东 烟台 264025
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-21 修回日期:2019-11-28 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-08-02
  • 作者简介:潘锐,男,1987年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地下工程支护方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51904006,No.51874188,No.51704125,No.51674154);安徽建筑大学科研项目(No.2019QDZ03)。

Experimental study on bearing characteristics of bolt-grouting support in shallow fractured surrounding rock of roadway

PAN Rui1, 2, 3, CHENG Hua1, WANG Lei3, 4, WANG Feng-yun1, 2, CAI Yi1, 2, CAO Guang-yong1, ZHANG Peng3, ZHANG Hao-jie3   

  1. 1. Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Building Structure and Underground Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, Anhui 230601, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, Anhui 230601, China; 3. Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong 264025, China
  • Received:2019-08-21 Revised:2019-11-28 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-08-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51904006, 51874188, 51704125, 51674154) and the Research Program of Anhui Jianzhu University (2019QDZ03).

摘要: 为明确巷道浅层破碎围岩锚注加固承载特性,开展了不同岩体粒径、岩性、锚杆数量等因素影响下对比试验。研究结果表明:(1)试件承载能力随粒径增大呈现先增大后减小的趋势,与相同条件下无锚试件相比,含锚试件峰值应力平均提高了53.38%,峰值应变平均减小了46.43%。(2)含锚条件下,与支护面相对的自由面及附近为宏观破裂优先发展区域,支护面破坏一般均滞后于自由面,试件由拉伸破坏为主,逐渐过渡到拉剪混合式破坏;无锚条件下,试件以拉伸破坏为主。(3)锚杆数量增加,试件承载能力逐渐增大,但是增长速率逐渐变缓,峰值应变减缓与峰值应力增长拐点一致。(4)试件具有渐进再破坏的3个特征:一是应力峰值前产生的裂纹在峰后阶段继续扩展;二是支护面表面材料随着裂纹拉伸产生剥落;三是裂纹由表面逐渐向试件内部发展,先是岩块脱落,随后宏观破坏发展到锚杆区域,造成试件整体承载能力丧失。

关键词: 破碎围岩, 锚注加固, 岩体粒径, 承载特性, 裂纹扩展

Abstract: To clarify the bearing characteristics of bolt-grouting support in shallow fractured surrounding rock of roadway, comparative bolt-grouting bearing capacity test was carried out with different rock particle sizes, lithologies, and number of bolts. The results show that: 1) the bearing capacity of the bolt-grouting increases first and then decreases with increasing the particle size. Compared with the non-anchored specimens under the same conditions, the peak stress of the anchored specimens increases by 53.38% on average, and the peak strain decreases by 46.43% on average. 2) Under anchored condition, the free surface opposite to the supporting surface and its vicinity are the preferred area for macro-fracture development. The failure of supporting surface generally lags behind the free surface, and the specimens gradually transit from mainly tensile failure to tensile-shear mixed failure; tensile failure is the main failure mode of specimens under the condition of no anchor. 3) With the increase of bolt number, the bearing capacity of bolt-grouting increases gradually, but the growth rate slows down gradually. The peak strain slows down, which is consistent with the inflection point of peak stress growth. 4) The specimens have three characteristics of progressive destruction: firstly, the cracks generated before peak stress continue to propagate after peak stress; secondly, the surface material of support surface spalls with the crack stretching; thirdly, the cracks gradually develop from surface to inside of the specimens, the rock fragments fall off first, and then the macro-damage develops to the anchor area, resulting in the loss of overall specimen bearing capacity.

Key words: fractured surrounding rock, bolt-grouting support, rock particle size, bearing characteristics, crack propagation

中图分类号: TD 35
[1] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[2] 李满, 辛昊哲, 刘先珊, 张帆, 胡大伟, 杨福见, . 基于修正相场模型的岩体混合模式破裂数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2600-2612.
[3] 马鹏飞, 张艺晨, 袁超, 徐茂洲, 郭小雄, . 软弱层岩体间隔破裂现象的近场动力学方法模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2296-2307.
[4] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[5] 都海龙, 金爱兵, 秦文静, 商瑞豪, 王传江, 马赛, . 单轴压缩下水泥注浆煤岩力学性能及损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1521-1533.
[6] 周建, 廖星川, 刘福深, 尚肖楠, 沈君逸, . 应用卷积近场动力学快速模拟随机裂纹扩展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 625-639.
[7] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[8] 孙旻洋, 王忠瑾, 谢新宇, 张日红, 娄扬, 朱大勇, . 饱和黏土中能源群桩热力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 382-390.
[9] 韩勇, 李树忱, 袁超, 冯现大, 王修伟, . 单轴压缩下薄喷裂隙红砂岩力学性质与裂纹扩展特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2583-2594.
[10] 张朝俊, 吴顺川, 储超群, 庞瑞, . 裂隙砂岩应变场演化与超声时移衰减特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1284-1296.
[11] 叶帅华, 辛亮亮, . 基于桩-土界面剪切特性的单桩沉降和承载问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1457-1471.
[12] 张宪尚, 文光才, 朱哲明, 隆清明, 刘杰, . 冲击荷载下充填节理岩体I型裂纹动态扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 396-406.
[13] 周晓敏, 马文著, 张松, 宋宜祥, 刘勇, 和晓楠, . 渗流条件下隧道锚注复合围岩体的解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 206-220.
[14] 梁东旭, 张农, 荣浩宇, . 交叉裂隙岩体裂纹扩展试验及混合有限−离散元数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1217-1229.
[15] 勒治华, 于庆磊, 杨天鸿, 曹永胜, 郑浩田, 邓文学. 侧限条件下充填散体压缩承载和传力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 362-372.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!