岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1911-1922.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1527

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

断层破碎带突水突泥演化特征试验研究

张庆艳1, 2,陈卫忠1, 3,袁敬强1,刘奇1, 2,荣驰1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250061
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-04 修回日期:2019-11-25 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-08-02
  • 作者简介:张庆艳,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道突水突泥灾害方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省创新群体研究项目(No.2018CFA012);国家自然科学基金面上基金项目(No.51879258)。

Experimental study on evolution characteristics of water and mud inrush in fault fractured zone

ZHANG Qing-yan1, 2, CHEN Wei-zhong1, 3, YUAN Jing-qiang1, LIU-Qi1, 2, RONG Chi1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China
  • Received:2019-09-04 Revised:2019-11-25 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-08-02
  • Contact: 袁敬强,男,1985年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事隧道突水突泥灾害与注浆机制方面的研究工作。E-mail: jqyuan@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail: zhangqingyan1990@126.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Research Project on Innovation Groups in Hubei Province (2018CFA012) and the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51879258).

摘要: 为了研究富水断层破碎带隧道突水突泥灾害演化机制,自行研制了一套可考虑质量迁移及地应力状态的大型室内突水突泥试验系统。利用该装置开展了不同水压加载方式、不同破碎带介质参数等条件的断层破碎带突水突泥灾害演化过程模拟试验。结果表明:(1)断层破碎带突水突泥灾害演化是渗流?侵蚀强耦合过程,在水压作用下,破碎带介质中的细颗粒首先发生迁移,导致充填介质孔隙结构增加,进而加速细颗粒流失,促使涌水率不断增长,随着细颗粒不断迁移流失,水流流态由层流转换为紊流,最终诱发突水突泥灾害;(2)破碎带介质初始孔隙率和施加水压越大越易诱发突水突泥,介质渗流演化特征越明显,渗流场参量如渗透率、孔隙率、雷诺数增加越快,且渗流场参量演化曲线出现突增现象;(3)梯度水压加载模式下断层破碎带介质较恒定水压加载条件下突水突泥演化特征更明显,介质发生突水突泥的临界水压更小。在此基础上,基于涌水率?时间(Q-t)、水力梯度?涌水率(i-Q)关系的流态转换分析和基于渗透率?水力梯度(k-i)关系的渗透性演化特征,建立了断层破碎带渗透演化特征概化模型。该研究结果对于断层破碎带突水突泥灾害演化机制与防治措施具有一定的理论指导价值。

关键词: 断层破碎带, 试验研究, 突水突泥, 渗透演化特征

Abstract: To investigate the mechanism of water and mud inrush in water-rich fault fracture zone, a large-scale indoor water and mud inrush test system considering mass transfer and crustal stress state is developed. The simulation test of water and mud inrush disaster evolution process in fault fracture zone under different hydraulic loading modes and medium parameters of fracture zone are carried out by using the device. Some findings are as follows. 1) Evolution of water and mud inrush disaster in fault fractured zones is a strong coupling process of seepage and erosion. Fine particles in the filling of fracture zones first migrate under the water pressure. With the continuous migration and loss of fine particles, the flow pattern changes from laminar flow to turbulent flow, which eventually leads to water and mud inrush disaster. 2) The larger initial porosity of filling in fractured zone and the higher of applied water pressure will induce the water inrush more easily. As a result, the evolution characteristics of seepage exhibit more obvious in the test, the increase of seepage field parameters such as permeability, porosity and Reynolds number are much faster, and the seepage field parameter evolution curves suddenly increase. 3) The evolution characteristics of water and mud inrush are more obvious under gradient loading than under constant water pressure loading condition, and the critical water pressure of water and mud inrush from filling is smaller. A generalized model of permeability evolution characteristics of fault is established with analysis of fluid state conversion on the relationship between water inflow rate and time (Q-t), the relationship between hydraulic gradient and water inflow rate (i-Q), and the evolution characteristics of permeability on the relationship between permeability and hydraulic gradient (k-i). The results provide guidance for evolution mechanism and prevention measures of water and mud inrush disaster in fault fractured zone.

Key words: fault fracture zone, experimental study, water and mud inrush, characteristics of seepage evolution

中图分类号: TU456
[1] 钟祖良, 杜传烨, 刘新荣, 李超, . 岩石顶管穿越深大断层破碎带摩阻力 计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 943-954.
[2] 兰斌鹏, 王延平, 王卫国, 王义军, 赵跃, . 拉桩支护结构变形及工作机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 551-562.
[3] 李永威, 徐林荣, 傅金阳, 商拥辉, . 列车荷载作用下铁路路基填料渗透破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 299-308.
[4] 陈光波, 唐薇, 李谭, 王创业, 王二雨, 张国华, . 裂隙煤岩组合体单轴压缩力学响应及失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2633-2652.
[5] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 峰前循环剪切作用下岩石节理剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 52-62.
[6] 雷勇, 李鹏甲, 刘泽宇, 李金朝, 胡伟. 岩溶区穿越溶洞基桩屈曲临界荷载计算方法 与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3347-3356.
[7] 崔猛, 符晓, 郑俊杰, 吕苏颖, 熊辉辉, 曾晨, 韩尚宇, . 黄豆脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀多变量试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3027-3035.
[8] 蔡灿, 张沛, 孙明光, 杨迎新, 谢松, 蒲治成, 杨显鹏, 高超, 谭政博, . 油气钻井中的分离式冲击−切削复合破岩机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2535-2544.
[9] 周翠英, 梁彦豪, 刘春辉, 刘镇, . 天然红层风化土成膜试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 132-138.
[10] 杨括宇, 陈从新, 夏开宗, 宋许根, 张伟, 张褚强, 王田龙. 崩落法开采金属矿巷道围岩破坏机制的断层效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 279-289.
[11] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[12] 展亚太, 王金安, 李飞, 杨柳, . 断层破碎带剪切作用下力链结构及演化 光弹试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2627-2635.
[13] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[14] 雷勇, 邓加政, 刘泽宇, 李君杰, 邹根. 考虑荷载位置偏移的空洞岩石地基极限承载力 计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3326-3331.
[15] 周其健, 马德翠, 邓荣贵, 康景文, 祝全兵, . 地热系统作用下红层软岩力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3333-3342.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!