岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 2869-2879.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1880

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同层理倾角炭质板岩巴西劈裂 试验及数值研究

李二强1, 2,张洪昌1, 2,张龙飞1, 2,朱天宇1, 2,路景淦1, 2,冯吉利1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,北京 100083;2. 中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-04 修回日期:2020-03-24 出版日期:2020-09-11 发布日期:2020-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 冯吉利,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事工程力学与地下工程的教学研究工作。E-mail:fjl@cumtb.edu.cn E-mail:lerqiang@163.com
  • 作者简介:李二强,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩石力学与地下工程的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No.2016YFC0600901);国家自然科学基金项目(No.41172116,No.U1261212)

Investigation on Brazilian tests and simulations of carbonaceous slate with different bedding angles

LI Er-qiang1, 2, ZHANG Hong-chang1, 2, ZHANG Long-fei1, 2, ZHU Tian-yu1, 2, LU Jing-gan1, 2, FENG Ji-li1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China; 2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China
  • Received:2019-11-04 Revised:2020-03-24 Online:2020-09-11 Published:2020-10-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the State Key Research Development Program of China(2016YFC0600900) and the National Nature Science Foundation of China(41172116, U1261212).

摘要: 炭质板岩中层理软弱结构面对其破坏性态具有重要影响。以陕西岷县木寨岭隧道富含黏土矿物炭质板岩为研究对象,开展不同层理倾角炭质板岩巴西劈裂试验,并采用内聚力模型进行数值分析,研究结果表明:(1)不同层理倾角炭质板岩荷载?位移曲线形式具有一定相似性,具有压密―近线弹性―破坏跌落的基本特征;(2)随试样层理由Divider型及0o、30o、45o、60o、90o变化,其对应抗拉强度为1.65、1.59、1.12、0.89、0.76、0.66 MPa,且该试样抗拉强度显著偏小,受固有缺陷、富含黏土矿物受加工时水岩作用及放置时间等损伤效应的影响;(3)破坏形态受层理影响显著,可分为张拉破坏、剪切破坏和基质及层理面间的拉剪组合破坏;(4)三维数值计算结果显示,内聚力模型所预测的炭质板岩巴西劈裂破坏过程和室内试验结果相比,具有较好的吻合度。所得内聚力模型断裂力学参数能够为相关岩性及工程的数值计算提供参考。

关键词: 炭质板岩, 层理, 抗拉强度, 破坏模式, 内聚力模型

Abstract: Bedding structural planes play a dominated role in the failure process of carbonaceous slate under loading/unloading conditions. In this work, specimens with the clay mineral rich carbonaceous slate were sampled from Muzhailing tunnel of Shaanxi province in China. A series of Brazilian split tests for the rock specimens was conducted and the corresponding numerical simulations were performed using the cohesive zone model (CZM), in which different bedding angles in the rock were taken into account. This study indicates that the load-displacement relations of the rock specimens with different bedding angles under loads are similar to each other. All of them demonstrates identical basic characters that includes the initial stage, the rock specimens compaction, nearly linear elasticity, and finally complete collapse. The tensile strength of different specimens with bedding angles of 0o, 30o, 45o, 60o, 90o and divider are 1.59, 1.12, 0.89, 0.76, 0.66, 1.65 MPa, respectively. The anisotropy coefficients are 2.41 and 2.50 (divider), and the deterioration of such tensile strength is significantly related to the intrinsic defects and damage due to the water-rock effects. Furthermore, the failure modes and patterns of the rock specimens strongly depend on bedding structures, which can be classified as approximately pure tension failure, shear failure, and mixed tension-shear failure. Additionally, the three-dimensional numerical results show that the predicted split failure processes of carbonaceous slate by the CZM model are in a fair agreement with the results of laboratory tests. Therefore, the fracture mechanical parameters of CZM are valuable for similar tunneling engineering as a reference.

Key words: carbonaceous slate, bedding, tensile strength, failure mode, cohesive zone model

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[2] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[3] 张佩, 杨承儒, 侯世伟, 杜修力, . 基于内聚力单元的土石混合体细观数值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1620-1631.
[4] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[5] 杨柳, 杨铎, 何满潮, . 基于纳米划痕的陆相页岩纹层界面过渡区分布范围定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 353-367.
[6] 刘少华, 夏才初, 徐英俊, 徐晨, . 高内气压作用下岩石破裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3431-3440.
[7] 刘宇鹏, 常鑫, 杨春和, 郭印同, 侯振坤, 李双明, 贾长贵, . 走滑应力特征下川南深层页岩高温真三轴压裂物理模拟试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3104-3116.
[8] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[9] 范浩, 王磊, 罗勇, 朱传奇, . 卸荷损伤砂岩的分级加载三轴蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 277-288.
[10] 高荡, 彭俊, 王航龙, 王林飞, 彭坤, . 含层理砂岩真三轴条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
[11] 韩勇, 李树忱, 袁超, 冯现大, 王修伟, . 单轴压缩下薄喷裂隙红砂岩力学性质与裂纹扩展特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2583-2594.
[12] 吴九江, 肖琳, 王丽娟, 张祎, . 基于粒子图像测速技术的节状地下连续墙变形特性与破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2707-2718.
[13] 王伟, 罗霄, 陈超, 刘世藩, 段雪雷, 朱其志, . 层状岩石不排气三轴压缩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1334-1342.
[14] 范浩, 王磊, 王连国, . 不同应力路径下层理煤体力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 385-395.
[15] 王通, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 蒋关鲁, 胡金山, 邵珠杰, 田士军, . 顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!