岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 2880-2890.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2060

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于振动台试验的黄土塬边斜坡 动力响应特性研究

李福秀1,吴志坚2,严武建1,赵多银3   

  1. 1. 中国地震局兰州地震研究所 黄土地震工程重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000;2. 南京工业大学 交通运输工程学院,江苏 南京 210009; 3. 中冶成都勘察研究总院有限公司,四川 成都 610023
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-09 修回日期:2020-04-09 出版日期:2020-09-11 发布日期:2020-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 吴志坚,男,1974年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程和地震工程领域的研究工作。E-mail: zhijianlz@163.com E-mail:1225950800@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李福秀,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土地震工程的科研工作
  • 基金资助:
    地震联合基金重点项目(No.U1939209);国家自然科学基金项目(No.41472297);南京工业大学引进人才科研启动经费项目。

Research on dynamic response characteristics of loess tableland slopes based on shaking table test

LI Fu-xiu1, WU Zhi-jian2, YAN Wu-jian1, ZHAO Duo-yin3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Loess Earthquake Engineering, Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 2. College of Transportation Science & Engineering, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 3. Chengdu Surveying Geotechnical Research Institute Co. Ltd. of MCC, Chengdu, Sichuan 610023, China
  • Received:2019-12-09 Revised:2020-04-09 Online:2020-09-11 Published:2020-10-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Earthquake Science Joint Foundation of China(U1939209), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41472297) and the Scientific Research Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing Tech. University.

摘要: 以平凉市崆峒区的黄土塬斜坡为原型,采用含裂隙与不含裂隙的斜坡概念模型,设计并完成1:25的大型振动台试验。在满足相似原理的前提下,通过输入不同幅值的水平向与竖直向地震波,分析两种结构的斜坡动力响应特性。结果表明:水平与竖直向地震波沿着坡面和内部竖直方向上均表现出明显的非线性放大效应,并在坡顶达到最大值;同等幅值的地震波作用下,在坡体中上部,坡面与断面4的加速度放大系数大于同等高程处无裂隙斜坡侧,而在断面1处,含裂隙斜坡的放大系数却小于无裂隙斜坡;输入地震波经斜坡土体传递后,卓越频率发生了显著的变化。随着高程的增加,坡体会对中高频段进行选择性放大作用,在含裂隙斜坡侧这种作用更为明显,且随着地震波的幅值增加,卓越频率向低频方向转移。在竖向地震波作用下,卓越频率衰减现象却不明显。

关键词: 黄土塬边斜坡, 振动台试验, 裂隙, 加速度动力响应, 频谱分析

Abstract: Based on the typical loess plateau slope of Kongtong district, Pingliang city, a 1:25 large-scale shaking table test is designed and accomplished using the conceptual model of the slopes with or without cracks. On the premise of satisfying the similarity principle, the dynamic response characteristics of model slopes of two kinds of structures are analyzed by inputting seismic waves in horizontal direction and vertical direction with different amplitudes. Results show that the horizontal and vertical seismic waves have obvious nonlinear amplification along the slope surface and the internal vertical direction, which reach the maximum value at the top of the slope. Under the horizontal seismic waves with the same amplitude, the acceleration amplification coefficient of the slope surface and section 4 are greater than that of the slope without crack at the same elevation in the middle and upper part of the slope, while in section 1, the amplification coefficient of the crack slope is smaller than that of the crack-free slope. After the seismic wave propagates through the slope soil, the predominant frequency changes significantly. With the increase of elevation, the slope will manifest selective amplification on middle and high frequency bands, which is more obvious on the side of fissure slope. Moreover, as the amplitude of seismic wave increases, the superior frequency transfers to the low frequency direction. However, the remarkable frequency attenuation is not obvious under the vertical seismic wave.

Key words: loess tableland slope, shaking table test, crack, acceleration dynamic response, spectrum analysis

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 苗日成, 唐贝, 祁飞, 江志安, 崔溦, . 随机裂隙岩体滚刀破岩过程离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 541-552.
[2] 李槟, 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 不同围压条件下花岗岩剪切过程渗透率动态演化规律数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[3] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[4] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[5] 王邺, 王述红, 张泽, 韩博文, 杨润生, . 裂隙及水幕影响下的水封洞库油品运移范围研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2907-2928.
[6] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[7] 王炳文, 刘臣毅, 康明超, 李乾龙, 杨雷, 周森林, 钱垒. 考虑应力的非闭合裂隙岩体损伤机制及裂纹扩展研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2409-2420.
[8] 高帅, 任富强, 常远. 预制单裂隙砂岩注浆过程中的浆液流动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2505-2515.
[9] 熊飞, 刘新荣, 刘文武, 钟祖良, 杨忠平, 王南云, 王浩, 薛熠, . 含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏与失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2516-2531.
[10] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[11] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[12] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[13] 王刚, 王恩茂, 隆清明, 徐浩, 陈雪畅, 刘昆轮, . 考虑滤失效应的煤层水力压裂与裂隙扩展关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1071-1083.
[14] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[15] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!