岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 2901-2912.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1907

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

孔隙水压力对锯齿状结构面剪切蠕变特性的影响

张峰瑞,姜谙男,杨秀荣   

  1. 大连海事大学 道路与桥梁工程研究所,辽宁 大连 116026
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-16 修回日期:2020-04-26 出版日期:2020-09-11 发布日期:2020-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 姜谙男,男,1971年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程稳定性分析和多场耦合方面的研究工作。E-mail: jiangannan@163.com E-mail: zhangfengrui@dlmu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张峰瑞,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程稳定性分析的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51678101);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.3132014326)

Effect of pore water pressure on shear creep characteristics of serrate structural plane

ZHANG Feng-rui, JIANG An-nan, YANG Xiu-rong   

  1. Highway and Bridge Institute of Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, Liaoning 116026, China
  • Received:2019-11-16 Revised:2020-04-26 Online:2020-09-11 Published:2020-10-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China(51678101) and the Central University Basic Research Fund Special Funds(3132014326).

摘要: 为探究孔隙水压对岩体结构面剪切蠕变特性的影响,自主研制了结构面一体化制作模具和多功能剪切流变仪,开展了孔隙水压力下锯齿状结构面的剪切蠕变试验,分析了孔隙水压对结构面蠕变变形、蠕变速率和长期强度的影响。试验结果表明:不同孔隙水压力下的结构面先后经历了瞬时变形阶段、减速蠕变阶段和稳定蠕变阶段,并且孔隙水压力的增大促进了结构面非线性特征的发展;随着孔隙水压力的增大,结构面瞬时位移、蠕变位移和稳态蠕变速率逐渐增大,而蠕变时长、破坏应力和长期强度均呈现明显降低的趋势。根据试验结果,考虑孔隙水压力对模型参数的影响,将蠕变模型中的瞬时剪切模量、黏性剪切模量以及黏性系数替换为孔隙水压力的函数,构建了能够反映孔隙水压力影响的结构面蠕变模型,并对模型参数进行辨识,将试验曲线和理论模型曲线进行对比,验证了模型的正确性和适用性。研究成果对富水区岩体长期稳定性分析提供一定的理论指导。

关键词: 孔隙水压力, 结构面, 剪切蠕变, 试验, 蠕变模型

Abstract: To explore the effect of pore water pressure on shear creep characteristics of rock mass structural planes, an integrated die for fabricating structural planes and a JAW-600 multifunctional shear rheometer were independently developed. The shear creep tests were carried out on serrated structural planes under pore water pressure. The effects of pore water pressure on creep deformation characteristics, creep rate and long-term strength of structural planes were analyzed. The experimental results show that the structural planes under different pore water pressures have experienced instantaneous deformation, deceleration creep and steady creep stages successively, and the increase of pore water pressure promotes the development of the non-linear characteristics of the structural planes; the instantaneous displacement, creep displacement and steady creep rate of the structural planes gradually increase with the increase of pore water pressure, while the creep time, failure stress and long-term strength decrease with the increase of creep strength. According to the test results, considering the influence of pore water pressure on the model parameters, the instantaneous shear modulus, viscous shear modulus and viscous coefficient in the creep model are replaced by the function of pore water pressure, and a structural plane creep model reflecting the influence of pore water pressure is constructed. The model parameters are identified by the optimization analysis software, and the correctness and applicability of the model are verified by comparing the creep test curve with the theoretical model fitting curve. The research results provide some theoretical guidance for the long-term stability analysis of rock mass under the action of groundwater.

Key words: pore water pressure, structural plane, shear creep, test, creep model

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 陶志刚, 李梦楠, 于海军, 范方政, 王炯, . 不同锚固孔径下2G-NPR锚杆锚固特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 67-80.
[2] 宋宇, 丁松, 陈凯斌, 江嘉辉, 杨承琨, 陈玉洁, 张建伟, 郑俊杰, . 碳化作用下活性氧化镁固化锌污染土的溶出特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 92-105.
[3] 黄曼, 宁昊晟, 洪陈杰, 陶志刚, 刘雨星, 张贺, . 基于第二代负泊松比锚杆加固的充填结构面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[4] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[5] 刘静, 王昊, 杨鑫, 苏进臣, 张友良, . 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀加固热带土质边坡现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 343-353.
[6] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[7] 蔡玉娟, 蔡静森, 任少文, 刘锴, 陈劲, 李漪, . 岩溶区非均质岩组岩体力学参数快速估计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2749-2762.
[8] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[9] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[10] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[11] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[12] 高帅, 任富强, 常远. 预制单裂隙砂岩注浆过程中的浆液流动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2505-2515.
[13] 徐卫卫, 谢遵党, 傅中志, 米占宽, . 粗粒土真三轴试验南水模型研究及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2559-2572.
[14] 谢宏丽, 周志军, 任玉波, 田叶青, 范经灿. 大直径预应力钢筋混凝土管桩群桩的水平承载性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[15] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!