岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 3604-3612.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0104

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地震作用下预应力锚索边坡的稳定性分析

贾志波,陶连金,史明   

  1. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-09 修回日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-25
  • 通讯作者: 陶连金,男,1964年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程防灾减灾的研究工作。E-mail: ljtao@bjut.edu.cn E-mail:jia2979424@126.com
  • 作者简介:贾志波,男,1990年生,博士,主要从事岩土工程防灾减灾的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2017YFC0805403)

Stability analysis of prestressed anchor cable slope under seismic loads

JIA Zhi-bo, TAO Lian-jin, SHI Ming   

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2020-01-09 Revised:2020-04-13 Online:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0805403).

摘要: 稳定性分析对边坡工程具有重要的意义。为探究地震对预应力锚固边坡的影响,基于预应力锚索具有安全储备的特点,分析了地震作用下边坡的分阶段模型。在传统Newmark法的基础上,采用拟动力计算,推导了顺层岩质边坡的位移、锚固力和安全系数计算公式。结合工程两个算例,探究了不同锚索模型和地震累积作用下的边坡变形规律。由结果可知,当锚索锚固力取固定值时,边坡计算位移偏大,随时间呈线性增长。当考虑锚索的安全储备时,位移增长速率随时间逐渐减小,最后趋近于定值。不同锚索模型对位移影响较大,锚索储备作用不可忽略。同时地震会对预应力锚固边坡产生永久性影响。当再次发生扰动时,其表现为临界滑动阈值的提升,位移增长率与受震经历的加速度幅值呈反指数变化。以露天矿区边坡为背景,在抗震设防标准下确定最佳支护方案。

关键词: 预应力锚索, 边坡, 地震, Newmark法

Abstract: Stability analysis is of great significance to the safety of slope engineering. In order to study the influence of seismic loads on slopes strengthened by prestressed anchor cables, firstly, the staged model of slope stability under seismic loads is analyzed based on the safety reserve characteristics of prestressed anchor cable, and secondly, the formulas of displacement, anchoring force and safety factor of bedding rock slope are derived by using the traditional Newmark’s displacement calculation method. At last, two examples are used to study the displacement behavior of prestressed slope under different cable models and seismic accumulations. It can be seen from the results that when the anchoring force is taken as a constant value, the calculated seismic slope displacement is larger and increases linearly with time. When considering the safety reserves of anchor cables, the growth rate of displacement gradually decreases with time and finally reaches a constant value. Different cable models have great influence on the calculated displacement, and the reserve effect of cable cannot be ignored. Seismic loads, meanwhile, have a permanent effect on the prestressed anchor slope. The critical threshold of slope sliding increases if the slope is re-disturbed seismically. Displacement growth rate is inversely exponential with the acceleration intensity of the last shaking. Finally, taking the slope of an open pit mining area as a case study, the optimum supporting scheme is determined under the seismic fortification standard.

Key words: prestressed anchor cable, slope stability, seismic loads, Newmark method

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 赵武胜, 周帅, 解佩瑶, 高厚, 秦长坤, 陈卫忠, . 考虑初衬−二衬界面效应下隧道地震易损性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 477-490.
[3] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[4] 余小越, 许明, 谢强, 蔡宇, 刘先珊, 甘峰帆, . SH波在三角形山体地形中的散射与能量分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2639-2649.
[5] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[6] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[7] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[8] 江沂键, 李焕焕, 朱大勇, 凌道盛, . 考虑推力线位置的边坡线性规划模型与极限平衡上下限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1745-1754.
[9] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[10] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[11] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[12] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[13] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[14] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[15] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!