岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 3621-3631.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0131

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

隧道突涌水机制与渗透破坏灾变过程模拟研究

周宗青1, 2, 3, 4,李利平1, 2,石少帅1, 2,刘聪1,高成路1,屠文锋1,王美霞1   

  1. 1. 山东大学 齐鲁交通学院,山东 济南 250002;2. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250061; 3. 长江水利委员会长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010; 4. 山东科技大学 山东省矿山灾害预防控制省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,山东 青岛 266590
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-09 修回日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-25
  • 作者简介:周宗青,男,1988年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道突水灾变机制与演化过程模拟分析方法等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51709159,No. 51911530214);山东省重点研发计划(No. 2019GSF111030);长江科学院开放研究基金资助项目(No. CKWV2018468/ KY);山东省矿山灾害预防控制省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地开放基金资助项目(No. MDPC201802)

Study on tunnel water inrush mechanism and simulation of seepage failure process

ZHOU Zong-qing1, 2, 3, 4, LI Li-ping1, 2, SHI Shao-shuai1, 2, LIU Cong1, GAO Cheng-lu1, TU Wen-feng1, WANG Mei-xia1   

  1. 1. School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250002, China; 2. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010 China; 4. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590 China
  • Received:2020-01-09 Revised:2020-04-13 Online:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51709159, 51911530214), Shandong Provincial Key R&D Program of China (2019GSF111030), the CRSRI Open Research Program (CKWV2018468/KY) and the State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MDPC201802).

摘要: 针对岩体渐进破坏和充填体渗透失稳两种典型突涌水灾害,阐述了动力扰动、开挖卸荷与高水压三者联合作用下岩体渐进破裂机制,以及高渗透压作用下充填体“变强度-变渗透性-变黏度”的渗透破坏机制。针对渗透破坏突涌水的变黏度机制,采用DEM-CFD耦合计算方法,开展了流体黏度对渗透破坏机制影响的定性模拟研究,分析了流体黏度对平均接触力、流量(流速)、孔隙率、颗粒运移过程、运移轨迹以及临界水力梯度的影响规律。结果表明,低黏度条件下的临界水力梯度比高黏度条件下的要小,换言之,低黏度条件下充填体更容易发生渗透破坏;平均接触力对水力梯度临界值的响应最为敏感,而流量难以准确反映该信息。从渗透破坏突涌水的变黏度机制这单一角度出发(不考虑渗透性增大的影响),随着黏性介质流入水体,流体黏度会增大,但流动速度会降低,两者共同作用下反而阻碍了渗透破坏过程的发展。最后,采用DEM-CFD计算方法,对工程尺度突涌水过程进行了模拟,再现了突涌水优势通道的形成与扩展过程,并指出了实现突涌水灾变机制模拟所需解决的参数选取与定量分析难题。

关键词: 突涌水灾害, 灾变机制, 流体黏度, 渗透破坏, DEM-CFD, 数值模拟

Abstract: In view of the two typical modes of water inrush disasters, progressive fracturing of rock mass and seepage failure of filling structure, the mechanism of progressive fracturing of rock mass under the combined effects of dynamic disturbance, excavation unloading and high water pressure is described. The seepage failure mechanism of the variable strength-variable permeability-variable viscosity of the filling structure under osmotic pressure is also expounded. For the variable viscosity mechanism of water inrush caused by seepage failure of filling structure, a qualitative simulation study on the effect of fluid viscosity on seepage failure mechanism is carried out using the DEM-CFD coupled simulation method. The effects of fluid viscosity on the average contact force, flow rate (flow velocity), porosity, particle migration process, migration trajectory and critical hydraulic gradient of the simulation model are analyzed. The results show that the critical hydraulic gradient of fluid with low viscosity is smaller than that with high viscosity. In other words, seepage failure of filling structure is more likely to occur under the action of fluid flow with low viscosity; the average contact force is especially sensitive to the response of critical value of the hydraulic gradient, however it is difficult to be accurately reflected by the flow rate. Considering only the variable viscosity mechanism of water inrush due to seepage failure (regardless of the effect of increasing permeability), as the viscous medium flows into water, the fluid viscosity would increase, but the flow velocity would decrease, and the combined action of these two changes would actually hinder the development of seepage failure process. Finally, the phenomenon of water inrush process in engineering scale is simulated using DEM-CFD method, and the formation and expansion process of the dominant channel of water inrush is reproduced. The problems of parameter selection and quantitative analysis are identified to realize the simulation of water inrush mechanism.

Key words: water inrush disasters, mechanism, fluid viscosity, seepage failure, DEM-CFD, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[6] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[7] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[8] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[9] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[10] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[11] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[12] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[13] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
[14] 马登辉, 韩迅, 蔡正银, 关云飞, . 静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1863-1872.
[15] 陈磊, 张强, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 黄娟, 胡晶, . 强降雨对库岸堆积体边坡稳定性影响的离心模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1423-1434.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!