岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 1095-1103.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1214

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

振冲碎石桩复合地基抗剪机制的模型试验研究

王家辉1,饶锡保1,江洎洧1,姚劲松2,熊诗湖1,卢一为1,李浩民1   

  1. 1. 长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010;2. 长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-16 修回日期:2020-09-26 出版日期:2021-04-12 发布日期:2021-04-26
  • 通讯作者: 饶锡保,男,1964年生,硕士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事岩土力学性质方面的工作。E-mail: raoxibao8899@126.com E-mail:h130719203@163.com
  • 作者简介:王家辉,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事碎石桩复合地基和松散土石体的基本特性研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2017YFC0405001);国家自然科学基金(No. 51979009,No. 52008032);中央级科研院所基本科研业务费项目(No. CKSF2019191/YT)。

Model experimental study of the shear mechanism of vibroflotation stone column composite foundation

WANG Jia-hui1, RAO Xi-bao1, JIANG Ji-wei1, YAO Jin-song2, XIONG Shi-hu1, LU Yi-wei1, LI Hao-min1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China; 2. Changjiang Institute of Survey Planning Design and Research, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2020-08-16 Revised:2020-09-26 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-26
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0405001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979009, 52008032) and the Basic Scientific Research Operating Expenses of Central Research Institutes of China (CKSF2019191/YT)。

摘要: 为了研究某工程振冲碎石桩砂质粉土复合地基剪切变形机制和强度特性,采用大型叠环剪切仪开展了两组不同桩体置换率下的碎石桩复合地基模型试验。对剪应力与剪应变、不同应力状态下复合地基变形及开挖断面进行了系统分析,研究结果表明:砂质粉土复合地基呈弹塑性体的特征,应力水平线S=0.5可大致作为弹塑性体的分界线;在复合地基大变形剪切过程中,桩土具有很好的变形协调性,且随着桩体置换率的提升复合地基剪切变形是被抑制的;目前少数明确提出复合地基抗剪强度计算公式的国家规范都建议桩土应力比n取1,即仅考虑面积置换率因素,这导致不同置换率下复合地基的抗剪强度计算结果相差较小,按规范22.7%置换率相较40.3%置换率? 值仅小1.32°,而试验结果22.7%置换率相较40.3%置换率?值小3.65°,这表明碎石桩对复合地基抗剪能力的加固机制不仅限于置换率因素,也应考虑其对复合地基整体排水效果的改变等因素。

关键词: 碎石桩, 复合地基, 剪切破坏, 抗剪强度

Abstract: To study the shear deformation mechanism and strength characteristics of vibroflotation crushed stone column composite foundation in sandy silty soil, two model tests of crushed stone pile composite foundation with different displacement rates of pile were carried out by using large stacking ring shear apparatus. The relationship between shear stress and shear displacement, deformation of composite foundation under different stress states are systematic analyzed. The test results show that: 1) The sandy silty composite foundation has a feature of elastoplastic object and the stress level S=0.5 can be used as the elastoplastic object’s dividing line roughly. 2) In the process of large deformation destruction of composite foundation, the stone columns and soil have a good deformation consistency, meanwhile, the shear deformation is inhibited with the increase of displacement rate of pile. 3) At present, a few specifications in China suggest that the number of stress ratio of pile with soil is 1 for the shear strength calculation of composite foundation, which means that only pile area replacement is considered. As a result, the calculation results of shear strength are close under different pile replacement rates. The permutation rate of 22.7% has a 1.32° gap compare with 40.3% while the pile replacement rate of 22.7% has a 3.65° gap compare with 40.3% in the model test. It indicates that the reinforcement mechanism of stone columns on composite foundation should not be limited to the factor of displacement rate, the change of drainage effectiveness of composite foundation factor should also be considered.

Key words: stone column, composite foundation, shear failure, shear strength

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[2] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[3] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[4] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[5] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[6] 张玲, 彭搏程, 徐泽宇, 赵明华, . 基于桩身弯曲破坏的路堤下筋箍碎石桩复合地基稳定分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 413-421.
[7] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[8] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[9] 张化进, 吴顺川, 李兵磊, 赵宇松, . 基于高斯过程回归的岩石抗剪强度参数不确定性估测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[10] 朱俊宇, 裴利华, 桂跃, . 含有机质土抗剪强度再认识——基于土壤有机质赋存形态的认知[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 451-460.
[11] 许宝龙, 卢萌盟, 刘元杰, 张鑫岩. 多元排水体复合地基固结解析模型和解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 73-83.
[12] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[13] 张雅琴, 杨平, 张婷, 韩琳亮. 含盐量及冻融条件对冻融氯盐粉质黏土静动强度特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 157-166.
[14] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[15] 冉宇玲, 张文博, 柏巍, 孔令伟, 周丽娜, 樊恒辉, . 基于孔内剪切试验的游离氧化铁对红黏土抗剪强度影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2573-2582.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!