岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1404-1412.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1105

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

风电空心锥形基础水平承载特性 及土压力分布规律模型试验研究

张玉1,李大勇1, 2,梁昊2,张雨坤2   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学 储运与建筑工程学院,山东 青岛 266580;2. 山东科技大学 山东省土木工程防灾减灾重点试验室,山东 青岛 266590
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-29 修回日期:2020-12-30 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 张雨坤,男,1987年生,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要从事土力学试验与地基基础理论方面研究。E-mail: philc007@163.com E-mail:zhangyu@upc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张玉,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事多场耦合岩土材料稳定性方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    山东科技大学科研创新团队项目(2015TDJH104)

Model tests on horizontal bearing capacity and earth pressure distribution of hollow cone-shaped foundation under horizontal monotonic loading

ZHANG Yu1, LI Da-yong1, 2, LIANG Hao2, ZHANG Yu-kun2   

  1. 1. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China
  • Received:2020-07-29 Revised:2020-12-30 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Research Fund of Shandong University of Science and Technology(2015TDJH104).

摘要: 空心锥形基础是一种新型陆地风电基础形式。开展粗砂中空心锥形基础的水平单调加载模型试验,研究基础尺寸、加载高度对水平承载力、基础周围土压力分布规律的影响。研究表明锥形基础水平承载力随底板直径增加而显著提高,随加载高度增加而降低。当无量纲化加载高度 (H为加载高度, 为基础顶板直径)由0.5增至1.0时,锥形基础水平承载力减小约43%。相同顶板直径和基础高度条件下,基础底板与顶板直径之比大于0.28时,锥形基础水平承载力高于圆型基础。水平荷载作用下,空心锥形基础绕一点发生转动,转动点沿加载方向基础前侧移动。加载过程中,沿加载方向基础前侧土体处于被动土压力区,土压力延基础埋深近似呈倒三角形分布,被动土压力区范围值随水平荷载增加而逐渐减小。基于极限平衡法,提出了水平荷载下基础与土体脱空面积的计算方法,采用模型试验数据验证了其准确性,模型试验与计算结果误差为4.5%。

关键词: 空心锥形基础, 模型试验, 水平承载力, 转动点, 土压力

Abstract: The hollow cone-shaped foundation is an innovative foundation for onshore wind turbines. Model tests were carried out to investigate the influences of foundation sizes and loading eccentricity on the bearing behavior and earth pressure distribution along the foundation embedded depth under monotonic horizontal loading. Results show that the horizontal bearing capacity of the cone-shaped foundation increases with the increase in the diameter of the foundation and the decrease in the loading eccentricity. When the normalized loading eccentricity, (H is the loading eccentricity and is the diameter of the foundation top plate), increases from 0.5 to 1.0, the bearing capacity decreases by approximately 43%. When the ratio of the base plate diameter to the top plate diameter of the cone-shaped foundation is higher than 0.28, the bearing capacity of the cone-shaped foundation is larger than that of the regular circular gravity-based foundation under the same top plate diameter and foundation height. During horizontal loading, the cone-shaped foundation rotates about the rotation center. The rotation center moves downwards and forwards with the increase in horizontal loading, and then tends to be a stable position. The sand in front of the foundation is in the passive earth pressure zone. The size of the passive earth pressure zone decreases with the increase in the horizontal load. A method of predicting the effective area between the foundation and the sand is proposed in terms of the force equilibrium. The effective area predicted using the proposed method agrees well with the model test results. The error between the calculated result and the test result is 4.5%.

Key words: hollow cone-shaped foundation, model tests, horizontal bearing capacity, rotation center, earth pressure

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[2] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[5] 卞海丁, 魏进, 王锦涛. 超大跨径管拱形钢波纹管涵洞的受力特性与土压力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2532-2546.
[6] 谢宏丽, 周志军, 任玉波, 田叶青, 范经灿. 大直径预应力钢筋混凝土管桩群桩的水平承载性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[7] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[8] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[9] 蔡田明, 李顺群, 程学磊, 周燕, 李有兵, 井乐炜, 方心畅, 王英红, . 温度对土压力盒测试数据的影响分析与应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1967-1976.
[10] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[11] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[12] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[13] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[14] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[15] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!