岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1473-1484.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1107

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

基于光滑粒子流体动力学方法的 泥石流冲击桥墩试验模拟

梁恒1,李吉林2,刘发明3,张伦4,付刚3,李明清3,何思明1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所 山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川 成都 610041;2. 中国国家铁路集团有限公司,北京 100844; 3. 中国中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,四川 成都 610031;4. 成兰铁路有限责任公司,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-29 修回日期:2020-12-28 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-08
  • 作者简介:梁恒,男,1991年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事滑坡、泥石流形成演化机制及数值模拟方法研究
  • 基金资助:
    铁道部科技研究开发计划重大课题(No. Z2012-061);国家自然科学基金重大项目(No. 41790433);铁总试验专项(No. CLRQT-2015-012);中国中铁科研项目(2012-重大-3);中国科学院重点部署项目(地震次生灾害风险与防控-KFZD-SW-424);四川省科技厅重点研发计划(No. 19ZDYF2709)。

Simulation of debris flow impacting bridge pier tests based on smooth particle hydromechanics method

LIANG Heng1, LI Ji-lin2, LIU Fa-ming3, ZHANG Lun4, FU Gang3, LI Ming-qing3, HE Si-ming1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Process, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; 2. China State Railway Group Co. Ltd., Beijing 100844; 3. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. Ltd, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 4. Chengdu Lanzhou Railway CO., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2020-07-29 Revised:2020-12-28 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Major Project of Science and Technology Research and Development Program of Ministry of Railways (Z2012-061), the Major Projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41790433), the Special Experimental Project of China Railway (CLRQT-2015-012), the Research Project of China Railway (2012-major-3), the Key Deployment Projects of CAS (KFZD-SW-424) and the Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province (19ZDYF2709).

摘要: 采用Bingham流体模型描述泥石流的动力学行为,将桥墩视为地形条件,在光滑粒子流体动力学(smooth particle hydromechanics,简称SPH)方法的框架上引入边界斥力改进边界条件,构建了泥石流冲击桥墩的三维数值计算模型。基于水槽试验对不同黏性的泥石流冲击桥墩的堆积过程及冲击力时程曲线特性进行了分析,根据水槽试验建立物理模型,实现了不同流变参数和重度的泥石流冲击桥墩的三维动力演化过程模拟,并对不同流变参数的泥石流堆积过程及冲击力时程曲线模拟结果进行了分析。从流体力学的角度对模拟结果进行分析,指出忽略湍流形成的能量耗散是导致稀性泥石流运动过程模拟与试验结果差异的主要原因,并讨论了不同黏性条件下泥石流冲击桥墩的防护措施。研究成果为泥石流冲击桥墩三维数值计算模型的进一步优化提供了理论支撑。

关键词: SPH方法, 泥石流, 桥墩, 冲击, 流固耦合

Abstract: In this paper, a three-dimensional numerical simulation model is established based on smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method. In this model, the dynamic behavior of debris flow is described by using the Bingham fluid model, and the bridge pier is regarded as the terrain condition. The repulsive force at the boundary is introduced to improve the boundary condition. Based on flume experiments, the accumulation processes of debris flow impacting the bridge pier with various viscosities and characteristics of the impact force-time curves are analyzed. The physical models are established, and the simulation of three-dimensional dynamic evolution processes of debris flow impacting the bridge pier with various rheological parameters and weights are realized. Moreover, the simulation results of the accumulation processes of debris flow with various rheological parameters and the impact force-time curves are analyzed. It is found that there are differences between the simulation results and the experimental results of the dynamic evolution processes of low-viscous debris flow impacting the bridge pier. From the view of fluid mechanics, the primary reason lies in the ignorance of the energy dissipation owing to lack of a description of Reynolds stresses caused by turbulence. Besides, the bridge pier safeguard procedures under the impact of debris flow with various viscosities are discussed. This work provides a theoretical support for further optimization of the three-dimensional numerical calculation model of debris flow impacting the bridge pier.

Key words: SPH method, debris flow, bridge pier, impact, fluid-solid interaction

中图分类号: P 642.23
[1] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[2] 姜立春, 李金柱, 李萍丰, 陈俊豪, . 顶板垮塌激励下多中段空区底板响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 916-929.
[3] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[4] 谭健, 刘学生, 耿艳峰, 付彪, 王洪磊, 许珂, . 防冲钻机钻测智能化试验平台研制及初步应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 673-684.
[5] 卢正, 李梦威, 唐楚轩, 胡智, 赵阳, 则志辉, 姚海林, . 考虑不同级配影响的填石路基压实质量评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3346-3354.
[6] 邵国建, 毛泽辉, 苏宇宸, 焦泓程, 吕亚茹. 钙质砂透射系数探究:波形耦合作用及梯度提升预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3661-3672.
[7] 徐东, 高明仕, 郑锐, . 同采工作面厚硬顶板破断诱冲机制及防控技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3219-3233.
[8] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[9] 任富强, 谷金泽, 孙博, 常远, . 含不同孔洞类岩石材料的动力响应机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 654-664.
[10] 李顺群, 蔡田明, 张勋程, 张丙坤, 杨长松, 周光毅, 周燕, . 冲击荷载作用下非饱和场地的三维应力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 477-484.
[11] 马林建, 邓家军, 王明洋, 李洪亚, 李增, 李干. 珊瑚礁灰岩平板撞击试验与状态方程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2232-2241.
[12] 王磊, 杨震宇, 陈礼鹏, 王勇, 张帅, 王安铖, 李伟利, . 不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间后冲击煤体能量演化与破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2251-2262.
[13] 詹金武, 周亚来, 王雨, 黄明, 江松, . 高温-冷却-冲击循环下花岗岩物理损伤及力学劣化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2362-2372.
[14] 王智德, 钱梦凡, 李杰, 司莹莹, 江俐敏, . 高应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1917-1928.
[15] 李利萍, 胡学锦, 潘一山, 李明会, . 煤的冲击倾向性对深部煤岩界面超低摩擦效应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1633-1642.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!