岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 1493-1500.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1486

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

垃圾土现场渗透性测定与土水特性反演

梁冰1,张柴1, 2, 3,刘磊2, 3, 4,陈锋2, 3, 5   

  1. 1. 辽宁工程技术大学 力学与工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430071;3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 污染泥土科学与工程湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 4. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所?香港理工大学固体废弃物科学联合实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 5. 辽宁工程技术大学 土木工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-04 修回日期:2021-03-03 出版日期:2021-06-11 发布日期:2021-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘磊,男,1982年生,博士,研究员,主要从事环境岩土力学与工程研究工作。E-mail: lliu@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:lbwqx@163.com
  • 作者简介:梁冰,女,1962年生,博士,教授,主要从事渗流力学及应用研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41977254);湖北省自然科学基金创新群体项目(No.2019CFA012);武汉市科技成果转化专项(No. 2018060403011348)

Field permeability measurement of waste and inversion of soil-water characteristics

LIANG Bing1, ZHANG Chai1, 2, 3, LIU Lei2, 3, 4, CHEN Feng2, 3, 5   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Contaminated Sludge and Soil Science and Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 4. IRSM-CAS/HK PolyU Joint Laboratory on Solid Waste Science, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 5. School of Civil Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China
  • Received:2020-10-04 Revised:2021-03-03 Online:2021-06-11 Published:2021-06-15
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41977254), the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of Hubei Province (2019CFA012) and the Science and Technology Conversion Special Project of Wuhan(2018060403011348).

摘要: 垃圾土非饱和水力特性是预测和评估填埋场内渗滤液迁移和分布的基础。以武汉市北洋桥垃圾填埋场好氧生态修复工程为背景,开展了现场单井抽注水试验,比较了不同理论方法对渗透系数计算结果的影响,并通过监测抽水试验的水位变化反演了垃圾土土?水特征参数。结果表明:现场试验测试的陈旧型垃圾土饱和渗透系数均在10?6~10?5 m/s量级,不同测试方法对饱和渗透系数测试结果影响不大;根据抽水试验结果推测抽水影响半径约为15 m,单井产流量为0.3 m3/h;垃圾土的平均残余含水率为27%,较室内测试结果偏大;垃圾土的进气值在2 kPa、孔径分布指数为1.20,与室内测试结果相近。利用现场抽水试验不仅可以直接评估垃圾土的导水性能,还能借助数值反演法准确估计有效的垃圾土?水特性,为非饱和水力特性参数的获取提供了一种新方法。

关键词: 填埋场, 垃圾土, 渗透性, 土?水特性, 数值反演

Abstract: The unsaturated hydraulic characteristics of wasted soil is the basis for predicting and evaluating the migration and distribution of leachate in landfills. Based on the aerobic ecological restoration project of the Beiyangqiao Waste Landfill in Wuhan, an on-site pumping water injection test was carried out, and the effects of using different theoretical methods on the calculation results of permeability were compared in this paper. It was inverted by monitoring the water level change data of the pumping test and unsaturated hydraulic characteristics of wasted soil. The results show that the saturated permeability coefficients of the obsolete landfills tested in the field test are all in the order of 10?6?10?5 m/s, and different test methods have little effect on the saturated permeability coefficient test results. According to pumping test results, it is inferred that the pumping influence radius is about 15 m, and the single well flow rate is 0.3 m3/h; the average residual water content of the wasted soil is 27%, which is larger than the measured value from indoor tests. The air intake value of the wasted soil is 2 kPa and the pore size distribution index is 1.20. The results are similar to the indoor test results. The on-site pumping test can not only directly evaluate the water conductivity of the garbage, but also accurately estimate the effective soil-water characteristics of the waste with the help of numerical inversion methods, which provides a new method for obtaining unsaturated hydraulic characteristic parameters.

Key words: landfill, waste, permeability, soil-water characteristics, numerical inversion

中图分类号: TV 139.1
[1] 丁前绅, 金佳旭, 曹天书, 刘磊, . 好氧降解对垃圾土沉降影响试验及干重度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3065-3076.
[2] 文少杰, 郑文杰, 胡文乐, . 黄土覆盖层气体突破和循环气体渗透特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 471-476.
[3] 冯世进, 徐熠, 杨俊毅, 郑奇腾, 张晓磊, . 基于集对-组合赋权的填埋场失稳风险评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2129-2139.
[4] 姜启武, 黄明, 崔明娟, 靳贵晓, 彭仪欣, . 酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀技术加固TBM壁后吹填豆砾石最优配比试验及机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2037-2049.
[5] 刘忠玉, 黄通通, 曹永青, 刘朝凡. 生物炭水泥土渗透特性试验及细观结构分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2929-2936.
[6] 李敏, 李辉, 于禾苗, 赵博华, 齐振霄, . 石灰粉煤灰固化石油污染土的渗透特性及其工程再利用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 108-116.
[7] 李玉萍, 陈嘉瑞, 施建勇, 樊宝云, . 热−力耦合作用下垃圾土体积变形特性和模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 49-58.
[8] 焦卫国, 庹斌, 张松, 贺明卫, 林长松, 刘振男, . 西北非湿润区毛细阻滞覆盖层防渗性能验证与长期服役高危易渗气象段分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 539-547.
[9] 刘映晶, 杨杰, 朱汉华, 尹振宇, . 一种新的高渗透性地层中盾构隧道同步注浆浆液损失的多物理场模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2744-2756.
[10] 张延杰, 何萌, 宋萌, 曹立, 赵海涛, 李梅. 富水砂卵石地层力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1739-1747.
[11] 金佳旭, 朱磊, 刘磊, 陈亿军, 姚远, 高腾飞, 李若欣, . 填埋场单井注气气体压力监测试验及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 259-267.
[12] 韩佳明, 董照, 苏三庆, 马鑫, 李冠兵, . 均质非饱和边坡降雨入渗解析解及在黄土边坡的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 241-250.
[13] 赵云, 杨忠方, 凌道盛, 陈鹏, 肖昭然, . 垃圾土中排水柱孔扩张问题弹塑性解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1825-1832.
[14] 张虎元, 王赵明, 朱江鸿, 周光平, . 混合型缓冲材料砌块渗透性及其各向异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 573-581.
[15] 章涛, 施建勇, 吴珣, 韩尚宇, 纪晓磊, 张慧华, . 单井注水改变填埋场中垃圾土温度的模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 499-510.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!