岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1794-1802.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1884

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

复合式整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙 结构行为试验研究

杨广庆1, 2,牛笑笛1, 3,周诗广4,李安洪5,王智猛5,王志杰2   

  1. 1. 石家庄铁道大学 省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室,河北 石家庄 0500431; 2. 石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,河北 石家庄 050043;3. 石家庄铁道大学 交通运输学院,河北 石家庄 050043;4. 中国铁道学会,北京 100844;5. 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-18 修回日期:2021-04-09 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-15
  • 作者简介:杨广庆,男,1971年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土工合成材料加筋、路基工程等方面的研究与教学工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51378322,No. 51709175);河北省自然科学基金资助项目(No. E2019208159);河北省创新资助项目(No. CXZZBS2018027)

Experimental study on structural behavior of reinforced retaining wall with composite full-height rigid facing

YANG Guang-qing1, 2, NIU Xiao-di1, 3, ZHOU Shi-guang4, LI An-hong5, WANG Zhi-meng5, WANG Zhi-jie2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. School of Traffic and Transportation, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 4. China Railway Society, Beijing 100844, China; 5. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group. Co. Ltd, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2020-12-18 Revised:2021-04-09 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51378322, 51709175), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2019208159) and the Innovation Funding Project in Hebei Province (CXZZBS2018027).

摘要: 复合式整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙是近年研制的新型加筋土挡墙,其面板由预制混凝土板和现浇混凝土组合而成。依托成昆铁路试验段进行此类加筋土挡墙的现场原位试验,并针对其结构特性提出设计原理。施工过程中,在挡墙内部不同部位安装传感器,进行长期监测。分析施工期和工后挡墙基底垂直应力、墙背土压力、土工格栅应变、基底及墙顶沉降、墙面水平位移的演化规律。在面板完成后发生2次地震,监测了地震前后挡墙的变化,研究地震对挡墙结构行为的影响。结果表明:基底垂直应力和墙背土压力随着填筑的增加,逐渐由线性分布演化为非线性分布。土工格栅沿墙高分布的应变峰值平面形状类似“0.3H法(H为墙高)”破裂面。地震后,基底垂直应力、基底及墙顶沉降和墙面水平位移增大,而墙背土压力和土工格栅应变先增大后减小。

关键词: 加筋土挡墙, 复合式整体刚性面板, 结构行为, 地震

Abstract: The reinforced retaining wall with composite full-height rigid facing is a new reinforced retaining wall developed in recent years. The wall facing is composed of precast concrete slab and cast-in-place concrete. Based on the test section of Chengdu-Kunming railway, the in-situ tests of the reinforced retaining wall were carried out, and the corresponding design principle was proposed according to its structural characteristics. During the construction, sensors were installed in different parts of the retaining wall for long-term monitoring. The evolutions of vertical stress on basement, earth pressure on wall back, geogrid strain, settlements of basement and wall top, facing horizontal displacement during and after construction were analyzed. Two earthquakes occurred after the completion of the wall facing. The changes of the retaining wall before and after the earthquake were monitored, and the influence of the earthquakes on the structural behavior of the retaining wall was studied. The results show that: with the increase of filling, the vertical stress on basement and the earth pressure on wall back gradually change from linear distribution to nonlinear distribution. The shape of peak geogrid strain surface along the wall height is similar to the “0.3H (wall height) method” fracture surface. After the earthquake, the vertical stress of basement, settlements of basement and wall top, facing horizontal displacement increase, while the earth pressure on wall back and geogrid strain increase firstly and then decrease.

Key words: reinforced retaining wall, composite full-height rigid facing, structural behavior, earthquake

中图分类号: TU 476
[1] 赵武胜, 周帅, 解佩瑶, 高厚, 秦长坤, 陈卫忠, . 考虑初衬−二衬界面效应下隧道地震易损性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 477-490.
[2] 潘申鑫, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 刘先峰, 何梓雷, 曹丽君, 周诗广, . 高速铁路整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙地震作用下服役性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[3] 余小越, 许明, 谢强, 蔡宇, 刘先珊, 甘峰帆, . SH波在三角形山体地形中的散射与能量分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2639-2649.
[4] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[5] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[8] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[9] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[10] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[11] 王滢, 刘嘉怡, 高盟, 孔祥霄, . 地震作用下深海含气能源土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 457-466.
[12] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[13] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[14] 何颖, 陈雅, 尹奔驰, 刘中宪, 刘旭, . 频率相关等效线性山谷交错场地多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3280-3288.
[15] 钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 杨楠, 刘凡, 王梦晨, . 基于小波变换和拟动力法的边坡地震稳定性评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!