岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1546-1556.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1337

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

降雨形式对毛细阻滞覆盖层防渗性能的影响研究

李宁1, 2，潘行1，张茂建1，张慧莉1，李昕珍1，许建聪2   

  1. 1. 上海理工大学 环境与建筑学院，上海 200093；2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室，上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-14 修回日期:2022-03-02 出版日期:2022-06-21 发布日期:2022-06-30
  • 作者简介:李宁，男，1982年生，博士，讲师，主要从事环境岩土、边坡、隧道等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（No.40872179，No.U1765110）；上海市自然科学基金（No.16ZR1423300）

Influence of rainfall patterns on anti-seepage performance of capillary barrier covers

LI Ning1, 2, PAN Hang1, ZHANG Mao-jian1, ZHANG Hui-li1, LI Xin-zhen1, XU Jian-cong2   

  1. 1. School of Environment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2021-08-14 Revised:2022-03-02 Online:2022-06-21 Published:2022-06-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(40872179, U1765110) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (16ZR1423300).

PDF (Chinese)

358

摘要： 毛细阻滞覆盖层的防渗性能对于控制渗滤液和减轻垃圾填埋场周边环境的污染具有重要意义，因此得到广泛研究。前人在研究中多采用恒定降雨强度来模拟降雨气象条件，而对降雨形式对毛细阻滞覆盖层防渗性能的影响关注较少。因此，采用自主研发的土柱降雨入渗试验系统，分别对短时强降雨和长时弱降雨两种降雨情况下，降雨形式对毛细阻滞覆盖层防渗性能的影响开展了研究，并揭示了最不利降雨形式。同时，采用SEEP/W软件对各试验工况进行数值模拟，以使模拟结果与试验结果能够相互印证。研究结果表明：试验结果与模拟结果基本一致，最大误差不大于3%；在短时强降雨情况下，降雨形式仅对覆盖层上部的体积含水率和孔隙水压力有较大影响；而在长时弱降雨条件下，降雨形式对整个覆盖层的体积含水率和孔隙水压力均有显著影响；降雨形式对覆盖层突破时间及渗漏量均有影响，前锋型降雨的突破时间最短，产生的渗漏量最大，后锋型降雨的突破时间最长，产生的渗漏量最小；前锋型降雨更易造成覆盖层突破失效而产生较大的渗漏量，为最不利降雨形式。该研究结果可为毛细阻滞覆盖层设计提供参考依据。

关键词: 毛细阻滞覆盖层, 降雨入渗, 降雨形式, 防渗性能, 数值模拟

Abstract: The anti-seepage performance of capillary barrier covers (CBCs) has been widely studied because of its importance in controlling leachate and mitigating pollution in the surrounding environment of landfills. However, the effect of rainfall pattern on the anti-seepage performance of CBCs has often been neglected in previous work because the constant rainfall intensity is usually used to simulate rainfall. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of rainfall patterns on the anti-seepage performance of CBCs and reveals its most unfavorable rainfall pattern under two types of rainfall conditions, namely short and heavy rainfall (SHR) and prolonged light rainfall (PLR), by using the self-developed soil column rainfall infiltration test system. In addition, the SEEP/W software was used to numerically simulate each test condition so that the simulation results and the test results could corroborate each other. The results show that the test results are basically consistent with the simulation results, and the maximum error is no more than 3%. The rainfall pattern only has a significant effect on the volumetric water content and pore water pressure in the upper part of the CBCs for SHR, while for PLR, the rainfall pattern has a significant effect on the volumetric water content and pore water pressure of the whole soil column. The rainfall pattern has an effect on both the breakthrough time and the leakage amount of the CBCs. The breakthrough time of the advanced rainfall is the shortest and the leakage amount is the largest, while the breakthrough time of the delayed rainfall is the longest and the leakage amount is the smallest. Advanced rainfall is the most unfavorable rainfall pattern, which is more likely to cause the CBCs breakthrough failure and produce large leakage. The research results can provide a reference for the design of CBCs.

Key words: capillary barrier covers(CBCs), rainfall infiltration, rainfall patterns, anti-seepage performance, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[4] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[5] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[6] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[7] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[8] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[9] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[10] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[11] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[12] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[13] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[14] 谌文武, 王科玉, 祁强, 张少冉, 王立, . 降水与蒸发交替作用下西北土遗址盐分迁移与赋存规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2209-2220.
[15] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发