岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 501-512.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1647

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多案例统计的基坑开挖引起侧方既有隧道 变形预测公式及其工程应用

刘波1,章定文2,李建春1   

  1. 1. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 211189;2. 东南大学 交通学院,江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-04 修回日期:2021-03-24 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 章定文,男,1978年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地基处理方面的研究。E-mail: zhangdw@seu.edu.cn E-mail: boliu@seu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘波,男,1989年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事基坑与隧道工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金(No.2021M690624);江苏省博士后科研资助计划(No.2021K146B);东南大学优秀博士学位论文基金(No.YBJJ1791)

Prediction formula and its application of existing tunnel deformation induced by laterally adjacent deep excavation based on case statistics

LIU Bo1, ZHANG Ding-wen2, LI Jian-chun1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 2. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China
  • Received:2020-11-04 Revised:2021-03-24 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2021M690624), the Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (2021K146B) and the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University(YBJJ1791).

摘要: 收集42个基坑开挖对侧方既有隧道影响的工程案例,统计每个案例中典型地层条件、基坑和隧道规模尺寸、相对位置、结构变形及控制措施等;分析重要因素对隧道竖向和水平位移的影响,明确了隧道发生隆、沉的判别条件,给出了坑外隧道竖向位移分区;提出了隧道水平位移综合预测指标,给出了3种地层条件下隧道水平位移经验预测公式。依托某实际工程,利用得到的预测公式对侧方隧道变形进行施工前预测,并把预测结果与现场实测结果进行对比,验证了预测公式的合理性。结果表明:侧方隧道受基坑开挖影响,水平位移均指向坑内,而竖向位移为沉降或隆起,具体与隧道拱顶埋深Ht和隧道距基坑水平距离Lt有关,统计得知隧道发生隆、沉的临界拱顶埋深为He + RHe为基坑开挖深度,R为隧道直径,拱腰距基坑临界水平距离为Lt = He,进而结合侧方隧道竖向位移分布特征,可将坑外范围划分为沉降区、过渡区和隆起区。基坑围护结构水平位移δhm、基坑开挖深度He、隧道与基坑水平间距Lt以及基坑沿隧道纵向宽度b均是影响隧道水平位移zhm的重要因素,ζhmδhmHe的增大而呈非线性增长的趋势,ζhm/δhmLt的增加呈幂函数递减,ζhmb的增加有增长的趋势,科学预测隧道水平位移需综合考虑这些因素的影响。采用bHe/Lt作为隧道水平位移预测指标,发现3种地层条件下ζhmbHe/Lt存在良好的线性关系。工程实例证实,根据其建立的隧道水平变形预测公式可以取得良好的预测效果。

关键词: 案例统计, 基坑, 既有隧道, 预测公式

Abstract:

Forty-two case histories in which the laterally adjacent deep excavation affects the existing tunnel are collected. The typical stratum condition, size, relative position, structure deformation and control measures of deep excavation and tunnel in each case history are counted. By analyzing the influences of important factors on vertical and horizontal displacements of tunnel, the judging criterions of tunnel heave and settlement are clarified, and then the zoning of tunnel vertical displacement outside the deep excavation is given. The comprehensive prediction index of tunnel horizontal displacement is proposed, and the practical empirical prediction formulae of tunnel horizontal displacement under three categories of stratum conditions are given. Finally, relying on a specific case study, the deformation of tunnel is predicted using the obtained empirical formula before construction, and the rationality of the prediction formula is verified by comparing the prediction results with the field monitoring results. The results show that the horizontal displacement of tunnel is towards the pit, while the vertical displacement is in the form of heave or settlement, which is related to the buried depth of tunnel crown (Ht) and the distance between tunnel springline and deep excavation (Lt). It is obtained from statistics that the critical value of Ht is He+R and the critical value of Lt is He, and then considering the vertical displacement distribution characteristics of tunnel, the area outside the pit can be divided into settlement zone, transition area and heave zone. Horizontal displacement of retaining structure (ζhm), excavation depth (He), horizontal distance Lt between tunnel and deep excavation and longitudinal width b of deep excavation along tunnel are all important factors affecting horizontal displacement ζhm of tunnel. ζhm increases nonlinearly with the increases of dhm and He; zhm/δhm decreases with the increase of Lt as a power function relationship; ζhm has an increasing trend with the increase of b, which means multiple factors should be considered to scientifically predict the horizontal displacement of tunnel. ζhm and bHe/Lt have a good linear relationship under three stratum conditions using bHe/Lt as the prediction index of tunnel horizontal displacement, and the tunnel horizontal displacement prediction formula based on it can achieve good prediction effect proved by an actual engineering case.

Key words: case statistics, deep excavation, existing tunnel, prediction formula

中图分类号: TU470
[1] 金国龙, 李鸿桥, 谢雄耀, . 圆形地连墙分载法受力计算理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 81-91.
[2] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[3] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[4] 任连伟, 王书彪, 孔纲强, 杨权威, 邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 573-581.
[5] 张振波, 李秉欣, 杨茜, 刘志春, 刘义, . 近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[6] 肖荣军, 马威, 李锋, 袁丽云. 一种深基坑排桩支护结构内力位移矩阵分析法 解答及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 579-595.
[7] 李涛, 舒佳军, 王彦龙, 陈前. 基于模态分解方法的深基坑支护桩水平变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 496-506.
[8] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[9] 易顺, 陈健, 潘家军, 王艳丽, 徐晗, 刘春鹏, . 内撑式基坑围护结构水平变形的表征函数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 568-578.
[10] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[11] 薛秀丽, 刘治珩, 曾超峰, 白 宁, 陈宏波. 开挖前抽水条件下基坑围挡两侧非极限土压力计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1699-1708.
[12] 雷国平, 苏栋, 程马遥, 刘慧芬, 张维, . 基于被动区土弹簧刚度降低过程的基坑围护结构计算增量法及软化p-y 曲线[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 797-808.
[13] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[14] 张治国, 毛敏东, 王卫东, PAN Y T, 吴钟腾, . 降雨影响下基坑开挖施工对邻近基桩变形响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 27-49.
[15] 张坤勇, 张梦, 孙斌, 李福东, 简永洲, . 考虑时空效应的软土狭长型深基坑地连墙变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2389-2399.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!