岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 2035-2059.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1926

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

我国软岩大变形灾害控制技术与方法研究进展

康永水1, 2,耿志1, 2,刘泉声3,刘滨1,朱元广1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩石力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-15 修回日期:2022-01-10 出版日期:2022-08-11 发布日期:2022-08-17
  • 通讯作者: 耿志,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事裂隙岩体稳定控制理论与技术方面的研究工作。E-mail:gengzhi21@mails.ucas.ac.cn E-mail:yskang@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:康永水,男,1985年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事深部破碎软弱围岩稳定控制理论与技术方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51774267, No. 41941018)

Research progress on support technology and methods for soft rock with large deformation hazards in China

KANG Yong-shui1, 2, GENG Zhi1, 2, LIU Quan-sheng3, LIU Bin1, ZHU Yuan-guang1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2021-11-15 Revised:2022-01-10 Online:2022-08-11 Published:2022-08-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51774267, 41941018).

摘要: 我国软岩工程涉及能源开采、水利、交通、国防等重要工程领域。随着我国能源开采逐渐向深部延伸以及交通、水利、隧洞等工程的发展,大量隧道、巷道需穿越软岩地层,高地应力、围岩破碎软弱等问题突出,软岩大变形灾害频频发生,造成重大安全隐患和经济损失。对我国现阶段软岩支护的研究进展做了系统的总结,从4个方面概括分析了软岩大变形灾害控制技术与方法的研究现状,包括:(1)以改进型刚性或可缩性支架、复合型衬砌为代表的被动支护方法;(2)以高强预应力锚杆、锚索为代表的增强型主动支护技术;(3)以注浆改性为主导思想的软岩改性技术;(4)让压技术;(5)多重改进方法联合支护技术。阐述了不同支护技术和方法的发展现状,分析了不同支护手段的适用条件、技术优势与不足。采用单一支护手段的改进通常难以满足软岩大变形控制的需求,如何实现不同支护措施之间的高效协同控制,以及实现对围岩变形应力场的实时精准监测等问题是目前我国软岩大变形灾害防控亟待解决的难题。最后,基于上述研究成果,分析了我国软岩大变形灾害控制技术的发展趋势并提出了建议。

关键词: 软岩大变形, 支护, 技术现状, 研究进展, 围岩控制

Abstract:

Soft rock engineering involves many important engineering fields such as mining, hydraulic engineering, transport and national defense. With the increase of mining depth and the development of tunnel engineering, a large number of tunnels and roadways need to pass through soft rock formations, in which the problems such as high geostress and broken and weak surrounding rocks are prominent. Large deformation disasters of soft rocks pose serious threats to engineering safety and cause enormeous economic losses. In this paper, the research progress on soft rock support in China is first reviewed, and the research status of technology for soft rock control for large deformation hazards is summarized in the following aspects. (1) Passive support methods represented by improved rigid support, retractable support and compound lining. (2) Reinforced active support technology using high-strength bolts and cables. (3) Soft rock modification technology dominated by grouting modification. (4) Soft rock reinforcement with pressure relief as the core idea. (5) Compound support methods. Furthermore, the development of different supporting technologies and methods are elaborated, and the applicable conditions, advantages and disadvantages of different supporting methods are analyzed. It is usually difficult to meet the demand of large deformation control of soft rock relying on a single support method. Therefore, it is urgent to solve the problems of the prevention and control of large deformation disaster of soft rock to realize the efficient collaborative control among different supporting measures and achieve the real-time accurate monitoring of deformation and stress fields. Finally, based on the above research results, the development tendency of support technology for soft rock with large deformation hazards is prospected and the countermeasures are proposed.

Key words: large deformation of soft rock, support, technical status, research progress, surrounding rock control

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 兰斌鹏, 王延平, 王卫国, 王义军, 赵跃, . 拉桩支护结构变形及工作机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 551-562.
[2] 任连伟, 王书彪, 孔纲强, 杨权威, 邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 573-581.
[3] 李培涛, 刘泉声, 朱元广, 高峰, 范利丹, . 煤矿深部巷道大变形分步联合控制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 591-612.
[4] 张基伟, 张佳鑫, 马文著, 贾红学, 吴卫东, 王传宝. 考虑锚杆滞后支护的竖井围岩加固力学模型半解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3395-3409.
[5] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[6] 肖荣军, 马威, 李锋, 袁丽云. 一种深基坑排桩支护结构内力位移矩阵分析法 解答及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 579-595.
[7] 石修松, 周高涨, 刘磊磊, . 基于非线性Hvorslev面的超固结土层隧道掌子面稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2595-2610.
[8] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[9] 张格诚, 徐晨, 夏才初, . 考虑剪切变形的高压储气洞室复合式预设缝衬砌力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3533-3544.
[10] 郭鹏飞, 王戌, 徐飞龙, 孙岩, 刘鑫. 软弱岩体锚杆物理锚固装置参数优化分析及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2961-2970.
[11] 舒晓云, 田洪铭, 陈卫忠, 朱珍德, 杨帆, 田云, 张朝轩, 张韬, . 某引水隧洞大变形缓冲层支护方案设计参数优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3117-3129.
[12] 高明仕, 俞鑫, 徐东, 贺永亮, 赵世帆, . 基于冲能吸能平衡效应的冲击地压巷道分级支护研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 38-48.
[13] 刘洪涛, 韩子俊, 刘勤裕, 陈子晗, 韩洲, 张红凯, 杨永松. 巷道蝶形破坏强度准则低敏感性研究及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 117-130.
[14] 黄生根, 张义, 霍昊, 陈常青. 软土地区深基坑支护工程格构柱变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 533-538.
[15] 张坤勇, 张梦, 孙斌, 李福东, 简永洲, . 考虑时空效应的软土狭长型深基坑地连墙变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2389-2399.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!