岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 282-290.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1872

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

饱和粉土中相变能源桩热力响应模型试验研究

汤炀1, 2,刘干斌1,郑明飞2,史世雍2   

  1. 1. 宁波大学 岩土工程研究所,浙江 宁波 315211;2. 宁波宁大地基处理技术有限公司,浙江 宁波 315211
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-05 修回日期:2022-02-15 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-03
  • 通讯作者: 刘干斌,男,1976年生,博士,教授,主要从事软土地下结构的教学与科研工作。E-mail: liugb76@163.com E-mail:79967135@qq.com
  • 作者简介:汤炀,男,1994年生,硕士,助理工程师,主要从事能源桩方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省公益技术应用研究资助项目(No.LGF20E080012)

Model test on thermal response of phase change pile in saturated silt ground

TANG Yang1, 2, LIU Gan-bin1, ZHENG Ming-fei2, SHI Shi-yong2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China; 2. Ningbo Ningda Foundation Treatment Technology Co., Ltd., Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China
  • Received:2021-11-05 Revised:2022-02-15 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Applied Research of Commonweal Technology in Zhejiang Province (LGF20E080012).

摘要: 长期非稳态的桩土热交换使得桩周土温度不断上升,产生热堆积效应,影响桩土换热效率,甚至也可使能源桩系统失效。为此,利用复合相变材料制备了相变混凝土能源桩,并在饱和粉土中开展了相变桩和普通桩热力响应模型试验,对比研究了相变桩的桩周温度分布、桩身应力−应变、桩顶位移和桩身换热效率的变化规律。结果表明:相变桩土热交换方向以径向交换为主,影响区域在2D范围以内,土体温度变化表现出滞后效应;相变桩的桩土温度变化幅度小于普通桩,具有缓解桩周土体热堆积效应的作用;在温度循环过程中,相变桩体累积了不可恢复的塑性应变。经过多次温度循环后,相变桩比普通桩的塑性累积位移更小;在夏季工况相变桩换热功率比普通桩增长约20%,冬季工况两者换热功率基本一致,随着运行时间增加,两者换热效率趋同。

关键词: 饱和粉土, 相变材料, 能源桩, 热力响应, 模型试验

Abstract: The long-term unsteady heat exchange of pile-soil makes the temperature of soil increase continuously. This phenomenon is called “heat accumulation effect” which affects the heat transfer efficiency of pile and soil, even make the energy pile system failure. In this paper, the composite phase change material was used to prepare the phase change concrete energy pile, and the thermal response model tests of the phase change pile and the ordinary pile were carried out on saturated silt. The temperature distribution around the pile, the stress and strain of the pile, the displacement of the pile top and the heat exchange efficiency of the pile were compared and anaylzed. The results show that the heat exchange direction of the phase change pile is mainly of radial exchange, and the influence area is within 2D, and the temperature change of the soil shows hysteresis effect. The change range of pile-soil temperature of phase change pile is smaller than that of ordinary pile, which can alleviate the thermal accumulation effect of soil around pile. During the temperature cycle, the phase change pile accumulates unrecoverable plastic strain. After several temperature cycles, the plastic cumulative displacement of phase change pile is smaller than that of ordinary pile. The heat transfer power of phase change pile is about 20% higher than that of ordinary pile in summer. The heat transfer power of both piles is basically the same in winter, and with the increase of operation time, the heat exchange efficiency of both piles is similar.

Key words: saturated silt, phase change material, energy pile, thermal response, model test

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 常洪林, 孔纲强, 王福慧, 王成龙, 周杨, . 褥垫层作用下预应力高强混凝土能量桩热力响应特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1240-1251.
[11] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[12] 任连伟, 王书彪, 孔纲强, 杨权威, 邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 573-581.
[13] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[14] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[15] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!