岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1416-1424.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1844

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同胶结剂人工结构性黄土的力学特性差异研究

李宏儒1, 2,梁恒楠3   

  1. 1. 西安理工大学 土木建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710048; 2. 西安理工大学 陕西省黄土力学与工程重点试验室,陕西 西安 710048;3.南阳师范学院,河南 南阳 473061
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-25 接受日期:2023-02-21 出版日期:2023-05-09 发布日期:2023-04-30
  • 作者简介:李宏儒,男,1972年,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土力学方面的教学和黄土力学与工程研究
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省黄土力学与工程重点试验室项目(No. 13JS073);陕西省自然科学基础项目(No. 2017JM5059)

Study on the difference of mechanical properties of artificial structured loess with different binders

LI Hong-ru1, 2, LIANG Heng-nan3   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China; 2. Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics and Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China; 3. Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang, Henan 473061, China
  • Received:2022-11-25 Accepted:2023-02-21 Online:2023-05-09 Published:2023-04-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Laboratory Project of Loess Soil Mechanics and Engineering (13JS073) of Shaanxi Province and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2017JM5059).

摘要: 黄土是一种具有显著结构性的土,由于原状黄土存在非均匀性、各向异性、原位取样扰动性以及试验重复变异性等因素,如何人工制备一种结构性黄土,能真实地反映原状黄土的力学特性,值得研究。针对已有向重塑黄土中添加水泥、石灰和新型岩土添加材料路液来制备结构性土的这些方法,研究了不同添加剂对人工结构性黄土的力学特性影响的差异性。研究结果表明:路液作为添加剂制备的结构性土随路液含量的增大,结构强度先增大后减小,不同于水泥和石灰随添加量增大、抗剪强度持续增大这一特点;在不同围压下,添加路液制备的结构性土,其应力-应变曲线演化规律较符合原状黄土的力学特性;3种添加剂制备的结构性土抗剪强度随含水率变化具有陡降区和平缓区的差别,在含水率小于塑限的陡降区,抗剪强度急剧降低,而在平缓区变化缓慢,趋向于重塑土;不同添加剂对人工结构性黄土摩擦角 φ 的影响较小,但对黏聚力 c 影响显著。研究成果有助于认识常用胶结剂对土力学性质改变的特性,也可为制备设定力学参数的人工结构性黄土的技术提供理论与技术指导。

关键词: 人造结构性土, 胶结剂, 结构强度, 应力-应变曲线, 抗剪强度

Abstract: Loess is a type of soil with metastable structure. Due to the inhomogeneity, anisotropy, disturbance of in situ sampling and repeated variability of tests of undisturbed loess, how to manually prepare a structured loess that can more accurately reflect the mechanical properties of undisturbed loess is worth studying. Based on the existing methods of preparing structured soil by adding cement, lime and new rock and soil materials Roadyes to remolded loess, this study investigates the influence of different binders on the mechanical properties of artificial structured loess. The research results show that the structural strength of the structured soil prepared with Roadyes as the binders increases first and then decreases with the increase in Roadyes content, which is different from the characteristics that the shear strength of cement and lime increases continuously with the increase in the addition amount. Under different confining pressures, the evolution of the stress–strain curve of the structured soil prepared with Roadyes is more consistent with the mechanical properties of the undisturbed loess. The variation of shear strength of structured soil prepared with three binders can be divided into steep drop stage and stable stage with the change of water content. At the steep drop stage where the water content is less than the plastic limit, the shear strength decreases sharply, but changes slowly at the stable stage, which resembles the remolded soil. Different binders have little influence on the friction angle φ  of artificial structured loess, but have significant influence on the cohesion c. The research results are helpful to understand the soil mechanical properties changed by common binders, and also provide theoretical and technical guidance for the preparation of artificial structured loess with preset mechanical parameters.

Key words: artificial structured soil, binder, structural strength, stress–strain curve, shear strength

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[2] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[3] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[4] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[5] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[6] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[7] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[8] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[9] 张雅琴, 杨平, 张婷, 韩琳亮. 含盐量及冻融条件对冻融氯盐粉质黏土静动强度特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 157-166.
[10] 张化进, 吴顺川, 李兵磊, 赵宇松, . 基于高斯过程回归的岩石抗剪强度参数不确定性估测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[11] 朱俊宇, 裴利华, 桂跃, . 含有机质土抗剪强度再认识——基于土壤有机质赋存形态的认知[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 451-460.
[12] 冉宇玲, 张文博, 柏巍, 孔令伟, 周丽娜, 樊恒辉, . 基于孔内剪切试验的游离氧化铁对红黏土抗剪强度影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2573-2582.
[13] 冯帅, 陈盼, 周家作, 韦昌富, . 赋存环境对含甲烷水合物沉积物力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1987-1999.
[14] 张季如, 陈敬鑫, 王 磊, 彭伟珂. 三轴剪切过程中排水条件对钙质砂颗粒破碎、变形和强度特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 375-384.
[15] 杨泰华, 黄友琦, 刘滨, 康永水, 耿志, 周秀斌, . 砂质充填型节理剪切力学行为试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3645-3657.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!