岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 511-524.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0217

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

粉土地基中劲性复合桩抗压承载特性与荷载传递机制研究

文磊1, 2,刘钟1, 2,马晓华1, 2,张振3   

  1. 1. 浙江坤德创新岩土工程有限公司,浙江 宁波 315100;2. 坤德智慧岩土技术研究院,浙江 宁波 315100; 3. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-22 接受日期:2023-04-03 出版日期:2024-02-11 发布日期:2024-02-07
  • 作者简介:文磊,男,1991年生,博士,工程师,主要从事桩基础和软基处理方面的科研工作。wenleihhu@163.com

Compressive bearing capacity and load transfer mechanism of stiffened deep cement mixing pile installed in silt

WEN Lei1, 2, LIU Zhong1, 2, MA Xiao-hua1, 2, ZHANG Zhen3   

  1. 1. Zhejiang Kunde Innovate Geotechnical Engineering Co., Ltd., Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China; 2. Kunde Research Institute of Intelligent Geotechnical Technology, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China; 3. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2023-02-22 Accepted:2023-04-03 Online:2024-02-11 Published:2024-02-07

摘要: 劲性复合桩(stiffened deep cement mixing pile,简称SDCM桩)兼具高强度芯桩的轴向荷载传递能力与搅拌桩较高的桩侧摩阻力优势,施工效率高、性价比高,在土木建筑领域中得到推广应用。然而,由于其荷载传递机制尚缺乏统一认识,现有计算方法与实测承载力差异较大。基于此,开展了粉土地基中SDCM桩现场足尺试验,研究了其抗压承载特性与荷载传递机制。搅拌桩固化剂采用普通水泥和GS固化剂(gypsum-slag soil hardening agent)。依据实测荷载-位移曲线分析了单桩抗压极限承载力及不同固化剂的影响,并通过现场桩身取芯及芯样无侧限抗压试验分析了现场施工水泥土与室内试样强度的差异。建立了考虑芯桩-水泥土、水泥土-土体接触面的三维弹塑性有限元模型,分析了竖向下压荷载条件下桩身轴力、接触面的剪切应力分布规律,探讨了SDCM桩的荷载传递机制与承载力提高原因。研究结果表明:粉土地基中SDCM桩抗压承载力大于纯搅拌桩和单独芯桩抗压承载力之和的1.5倍;在端阻力发挥作用后,桩底水泥土由于轴向受压变形,芯桩-水泥土之间的剪切变形会大幅增加,该位置易产生剪切破坏。水泥土固化后与地基土接触面性能的改善是SDCM桩相对传统灌注桩具有更高的承载力的主要原因。

关键词: 劲性复合桩, 粉土地基, 抗压承载力, 现场试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: Stiffened deep cement mixing (SDCM) pile are gaining popularity in civil and architectural engineering due to their combination of core pile advantages, such as high axial load transfer ability, and deep mixing column advantages, such as high side friction. SDCM piles offer high construction efficiency, high bearing capacity, and lower costs. However, the existing calculation methods for determining their bearing capacity often differ significantly from actual test results due to a lack of unified understanding regarding their load transfer mechanism. To address this, full-scale field tests of SDCM piles embedded in silt were conducted to study the compressive bearing characteristics and load transfer mechanism. Ordinary cement and gypsum-slag soil hardening agent were both used as the binder materials in SDCM pile. The pile load-displacement curves were measured, and the ultimate bearing capacity of a single SDCM pile under compression was analyzed. The influence of binder materials was also checked. Coring tests were conducted to obtain its unconfined compressive strength (UCS). The discreteness of UCS between the field mixing cemented soil and the laboratory test were also analyzed. A three-dimensional elastoplastic finite element numerical model considering the interfaces of core pile-cemented soil and cemented soil-in-situ soils was established. The distribution of axial force along pile shaft and the shear stress between contact surfaces under different loads applied to the pile head were explored. The load transfer mechanism was analyzed and the higher bearing capacity compared with bored piles were discussed. The results show that the ultimate compressive bearing capacity of the SDCM pile in silt is larger than 1.5 times the sum of the compressive bearing capacity of the pure deep mixing pile and the single core pile. As the end resistance takes effect and increases, the shear deformation between the core pile and the cemented soil at the pile tip will increase rapidly due to the axial compression of the cemented soil. Thus, this position is prone to shear failure. Compared with traditional bored piles, the improvement of the bearing capacity the SDCM pile is mainly due to the interface improvement caused by solidification.

Key words: stiffened deep cement mixing pile, silt, compressive bearing capacity, field test, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU 47
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[6] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[7] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[8] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[9] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[10] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[11] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[12] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[13] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
[14] 马登辉, 韩迅, 蔡正银, 关云飞, . 静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1863-1872.
[15] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!