岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 2786-2796.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1635

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响

薛秀丽1, 2,谢伟睿1, 2,廖欢1, 2,曾超峰1, 2,陈宏波1, 2,徐长节3,韩磊4   

  1. 1. 湖南科技大学 岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411201;2. 湖南科技大学 土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411201; 3. 华东交通大学 轨道交通基础设施性能监测与保障国家重点实验室,江西 南昌 330013;4. 中国建筑第八工程局有限公司,上海 200122
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-01 接受日期:2023-12-24 出版日期:2024-09-06 发布日期:2024-09-03
  • 通讯作者: 曾超峰,男,1987年生,博士(后),教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail: cfzeng@hnust.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:薛秀丽,女,1986年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail: xlxue@hnust.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51978261,No.52238009);湖南省自然科学基金项目(No.2022JJ20023);湖南省科技创新计划项目(No.2022RC1172);江西省自然科学基金项目(No.20223BBG71018)。

Barrier effect of adjacent deep-buried metro station and its influence on ground settlement induced by foundation pit dewatering

XUE Xiu-li1, 2, XIE Wei-rui1, 2, LIAO Huan1, 2, ZENG Chao-feng1, 2, CHEN Hong-bo1, 2, XU Chang-jie3, HAN Lei4   

  1. 1. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering for Stability Control and Health Monitoring, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Performance Monitoring Protecting of Rail Transit Infrastructure, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China; 4. China Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp, Ltd., Shanghai 200122, China
  • Received:2023-11-01 Accepted:2023-12-24 Online:2024-09-06 Published:2024-09-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978261, 52238009), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2022JJ20023), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (2022RC1172) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20223BBG71018).

摘要: 既有地下结构会阻隔地下水渗流(阻水效应)和其周边土体运动(阻土效应),使得该条件下的基坑抽水致沉规律与无邻近地下阻隔时不同。以实际基坑抽水试验为工程依托,以基坑外既有地铁车站结构的水−土阻隔效应为例,通过建立不同车站位置、车站埋深及基坑抽水强度的系列三维数值仿真模型来研究不同水−土阻隔效应条件下的基坑抽水致沉规律。研究表明:当基坑外存在车站结构时,基坑抽水沉陷被加剧或被限制,这取决于阻水和阻土效应孰强孰弱,而车站与基坑间距D的远近将决定阻水和阻土效应的相对强弱,进而决定基坑抽水沉陷是被加剧还是被限制;车站埋深H只会单一影响阻水或阻土效应的发挥强度,不会决定阻水和阻土效应谁起主导作用。工程中应针对基坑外邻近车站的具体位置和埋深考虑其水−土阻隔效应的影响,从而更准确地评估该条件下的抽水致沉规律。

关键词: 基坑抽水, 阻隔效应, 地下结构, 基坑变形, 抽水试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: The existing underground structure blocks groundwater seepage (i.e., water-blocking (WB) effect) and restricts surrounding soil movement (i.e., soil-blocking (SB) effect). This leads to differences in the dewatering-induced behaviors of groundwater and strata compared to scenarios without nearby structures. In this study, a typical metro station was chosen as the nearby underground structure that impedes groundwater and soil flow. Three-dimensional hydro-mechanical numerical models were developed based on an actual foundation pit pumping test to analyze the dewatering-induced responses of groundwater and strata under different WB and SB effects. Factors such as the relative location of the metro station to the excavation, the buried depth of the station structure, and the dewatering depth in the model were considered. The results indicate that the presence of a metro station near the excavation site can either aggravate or restricte dewatering-induced ground settlement, depending on the strength of the SB and WB effects. The distance D between the excavation and the metro station determines the relatively strength of the SB and WB effects, thereby influencing whether the ground settlement is aggravated or restricted. On the other hand, the buried depth H of the station only singularly affects the intensity of the WB or SB effect and could not determine which barrier effect plays the dominant role. In practical engineering applications, it is essential to consider both WB and SB effects based on the proximity and buried depth of the adjacent station structure to effectively assess the dewatering-induced behaviors of groundwater and strata.

Key words: foundation pit dewatering, barrier effect, underground structure, foundation pit deformation, pumping test, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU470
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[6] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[7] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[8] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[9] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[10] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[11] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[12] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
[13] 马登辉, 韩迅, 蔡正银, 关云飞, . 静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1863-1872.
[14] 孔纲强, 常洪林, 王天赐, 杨庆, . 区域尺度地埋管地源热泵与能源地下结构开采浅层地热能评价综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1265-1283.
[15] 陈磊, 张强, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 黄娟, 胡晶, . 强降雨对库岸堆积体边坡稳定性影响的离心模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1423-1434.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!