岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 451-460.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0693

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

含有机质土抗剪强度再认识——基于土壤有机质赋存形态的认知

朱俊宇1,裴利华1, 2,桂跃1   

  1. 1. 昆明理工大学 建筑工程学院,云南 昆明 650500;2. 中铁四院集团西南勘察设计有限公司,云南 昆明 650504
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-30 接受日期:2023-08-22 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2024-09-21
  • 通讯作者: 桂跃,男,1982年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土工程性质方面的教学研究工作。E-mail: gydrgui@kmust.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:朱俊宇,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事特殊土工程性质方面的研究工作。E-mail: 331517684@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51768027,No.52068039);中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司科技研发计划(No.院科2020K145);云南省“万人计划”项目。

Reconceptualization of the shear strength of organic soils: based on the perception of soil organic matter occurrence forms

ZHU Jun-yu1, PEI Li-hua1, 2, GUI Yue1   

  1. 1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China; 2. China Railway Fourth Academy Group Southwest Survey and Design Co., Ltd., Kunming, Yunnan 650504, China
  • Received:2023-05-30 Accepted:2023-08-22 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51768027, 52068039), the Key Research and Development Plan of China Railway Fourth Academy Group Southwest Survey and Design Co., Ltd. (2020K145) and the “10000 Talent Program” of the Yunnan Province.

摘要: 有机质通常以结合态、自由态形式赋存于土中,不同赋存形态有机质物理、化学性质差异很大。一直以来,土力学领域主要关注有机质含量对土的宏观工程性质的影响,其赋存形态差异有何影响还鲜有报道。通过人工调配不同有机质含量土样,并基于傅积平法测试了土样中不同赋存形态有机质的含量;分别在排水、不排水条件下对土进行了抗剪强度试验,在明确其抗剪强度随有机质含量wu变化规律的同时,也厘清了有机质赋存形态与抗剪强度之间的关联。试验结果表明:①不排水条件下,内摩擦角随着wu增大发生大幅度下降,变化过程大致可以分为显著下降段、过渡段及平稳变化段3个阶段;显著下降段结束点对应的wu和阈值wu,2比较接近,即内摩擦角随wu显著下降主要发生在结合态有机质为主的土中;平稳变化段大致发生在wu>25%后。②在排水条件下,内摩擦角随着w增大有一定下降趋势,但与有机质赋存形态无关。③无论排水条件如何,黏聚力和有机质赋存形态间无明显的联系。机制分析表明:不排水条件下,结合态有机质的存在会起到润滑作用,减弱土颗粒间的摩擦性;而当自由态有机质含量达到一定量时,土体宏观性质由摩擦型材料向胶体材料转变;排水条件下,由于有机质极易被压缩,无论有机质含量及赋存形态如何,构成土体骨架的均为矿质土颗粒。

关键词: 含有机质土, 抗剪强度, 有机质赋存形态, 黏聚力, 内摩擦角

Abstract: Soil organic matter (SOM) usually occurs in mineral-associated or particulate forms, with significant variations in the physical and chemical properties among different forms of organic matter. In soil mechanics, there has been focusing on the influence of SOM content on the macroscopic engineering properties of soil. To date, limited knowledge exists regarding the influence of SOM occurrence form on soil engineering properties. In this study, soil samples with different SOM contents wu were manually prepared, and the contents of various occurrence forms of SOM were measured using Fu’s method. Direct shear tests were conducted under drained and undrained conditions to elucidate the variation in ultimate shear strength and shear strength parameters with SOM content wu, while also examining the impact of SOM occurrence form on the shear strength of organic soil. The experimental outcomes are as follows. The internal friction angle undergoes a notable decrease with increasing wu under undrained conditions, which can be categorized into three distinct stages: a significant decline (Stage I), a transition phase (Stage II), and a stable change (Stage III). wu corresponding to the endpoint of stage I approximates the threshold wu,2, suggesting that the pronounced reduction in internal friction angle with wu augmentation primarily occurs in organic soils dominated by mineral-associated SOM. Stage III emerges approximately after wu > 25%. Under drainage conditions, the internal friction angle diminishes with wu augmentation, yet its variation is independent of the occurrence form of SOM. No discernible correlation exists between cohesion of organic soil and occurrence form of SOM under drained and undrained conditions. Mechanism analysis reveals that mineral-associated SOM facilitates lubrication and diminishes friction between soil particles under undrained conditions. When the content of particulate form SOM reaches a critical threshold, the mechanical properties of the soil transforms from a frictional material to a colloidal material. Nevertheless, under drainage conditions, SOM’s susceptibility to compression results in the soil skeleton ultimately comprising primarily mineral soil particles, regardless of SOM content or occurrence form.

Key words: organic soil, shear strength, soil organic matter occurrence forms, cohesive force, internal friction angle

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[2] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[3] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[4] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[5] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[6] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[7] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[8] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[9] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[10] 张化进, 吴顺川, 李兵磊, 赵宇松, . 基于高斯过程回归的岩石抗剪强度参数不确定性估测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[11] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[12] 张雅琴, 杨平, 张婷, 韩琳亮. 含盐量及冻融条件对冻融氯盐粉质黏土静动强度特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 157-166.
[13] 冉宇玲, 张文博, 柏巍, 孔令伟, 周丽娜, 樊恒辉, . 基于孔内剪切试验的游离氧化铁对红黏土抗剪强度影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2573-2582.
[14] 陈军浩, 张艳娥, 王刚, 王恒, . 不同固结路径下钙质砂固结排水强度性状研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2290-2298.
[15] 冯帅, 陈盼, 周家作, 韦昌富, . 赋存环境对含甲烷水合物沉积物力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1987-1999.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!