岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 3286-3294.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1910

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环温度荷载下高温管道-软土地基相互作用模型试验研究

崔金虎1, 2,王路君1, 2,叶智刚1, 2,燕秉法1, 2,黄家晟2,朱斌1, 2   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 超重力研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 浙江大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-21 接受日期:2024-02-20 出版日期:2024-11-11 发布日期:2024-11-14
  • 通讯作者: 王路君,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,主要从事水合物沉积物力学特性和土体多相多场耦合等方面的教学与研究。E-mail: lujunwang@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:崔金虎,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事高温管道在位稳定性与灾变防控方面的研究。E-mail: 22112014@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52078458, No. 51988101)

Modeling test on heated pipeline-soil interaction under cyclic temperature loading

CUI Jin-hu1, 2, WANG Lu-jun1, 2, YE Zhi-gang1, 2, YAN Bing-fa1, 2, HUANG Jia-sheng2, ZHU Bin1, 2   

  1. 1. Center for Hypergravity Experimental and Interdisciplinary Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2023-12-21 Accepted:2024-02-20 Online:2024-11-11 Published:2024-11-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (52078458, 51988101).

摘要: 高温管道运输是油气资源长距离输送最为经济有效的方式之一,其中高温管道-软土地基相互作用机制是分析其服役稳定性的关键。高温管道服役期间向软土地基传递热量,引起地基复杂的热水力多场耦合作用,改变地基的承载性能,显著影响管道服役稳定性。研制了能模拟管道温度变化的高温管道-软土地基相互作用模型试验系统,针对高温管道启停与运行过程中的循环温度荷载作用,开展了不同预压应力地基、管道加热功率及加热方式下的模型试验,探究了循环温度下高温管道服役期间管周地基温度与孔压演化规律、管周地基约束力发挥过程及地基承载演变特性。试验表明:持续升温过程中管周土体孔压上升,升至峰值后显著下降,甚至出现负孔压,此阶段利于管道的稳定性;循环温度加载时,温度循环诱发地基孔压随之波动,管侧孔压波动幅值较管顶与管底较小;管道上拔过程中,位移达到约1.2倍管径时地基土体达其极限承载力,较大的先期固结压力会提供较大的承载力,但超固结和正常固结地基土的上拔承载力相差不大;试验时地基T-bar测试显示,在管道埋深处,单次加热维持高温阶段地基强度有明显增强,停止加热后地基土较加热前强度亦有所增加。

关键词: 高温管道, 温度荷载, 软土地基, 上拔承载力, 模型试验

Abstract: Heated pipeline transportation is one of the most economical and effective methods for long-distance transportation of oil and gas resources. Among them, the interaction mechanism between high-temperature pipelines and soft soil foundations is the key to analyzing their service stability. During the long-term service of the heated pipeline, heat is transferred to the surrounding soft soil, triggering complex hydro-thermal-mechanical coupling behavior. This, in turn, alters the bearing capacity of the foundation, significantly affecting the stability of the pipeline in service. A model test system has been developed to simulate the interaction between high-temperature pipelines and soft soil foundations, capable of replicating temperature variations in the pipeline. Focusing on the cyclic temperature loading experienced during the start-up, shutdown, and operation of high-temperature pipelines, model tests were conducted under various conditions, including different pre-compression stresses in the foundation, pipeline heating powers, and heating methods. These tests aimed to explore the evolution of temperature and pore pressure in the soil surrounding the pipeline during its service life under cyclic temperatures. Furthermore, the study investigated the development of restraint forces in the surrounding soil and the changing bearing characteristics of the foundation. The test results indicate that during continuous heating, the pore pressure around the pipeline increases, peaking before significantly decreasing, and may even reach negative values. This phase is beneficial for pipeline stability. When subjected to cyclic temperature loading, fluctuations in temperature induce corresponding variations in the pore pressure of the foundation. It’s worth noting that the amplitude of pore pressure fluctuations is smaller at the sides of the pipeline compared to the top and bottom. In tests simulating pipeline uplift, the foundation reaches its ultimate bearing capacity when the displacement reaches approximately 1.2 times the diameter of the pipe. Additionally, a higher pre-consolidation pressure offers greater bearing capacity, although there is little difference in uplift capacity between super-consolidated and normally consolidated foundation soils. T-bar tests conducted on the foundation revealed a significant enhancement in foundation strength during the high-temperature phase maintained by a single heating cycle. Moreover, an increase in foundation strength was observed even after the heating was stopped.

Key words: heated pipeline, temperature loading, soft soil, bearing capacity, modeling test

中图分类号: TU 447
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 胡伟, 曾攀煜, 王辉, 刘顺凯, 陈秋南, PUIG DAMIANS I, . 黏性土地基中水平条形锚板上拔承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1731-1744.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[7] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[8] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[9] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 郭焕明, 张虎, 丑亚玲, 郑波, 胡金涛, 韩善博, . 径向冻融过程中软黏土水热力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 905-915.
[12] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[13] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[14] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[15] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!