岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 3545-3554.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0585

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

聚氨酯类聚合物砂浆−混凝土界面黏结性能与变形特征试验研究

蒋中明1, 2,石兆丰1,杨雪1,田湘3,肖喆臻1,刘琛智1,黄湘宜1   

  1. 1. 长沙理工大学 水利与环境工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114;2. 长沙理工大学 水沙科学与水灾害防治湖南省重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410114; 3. 长沙理工大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-18 接受日期:2024-08-05 出版日期:2024-12-09 发布日期:2024-12-04
  • 作者简介:蒋中明,男,1969年生,博士,教授,主要从事人工硐室储气库建造技术方面的研究工作。E-mail: zzmmjiang@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52178381);2023年湖南省研究生科研创新项目(No.CX20230883)。

Experimental study on bonding properties and deformation characteristics of polyurethane polymer mortar-concrete interface

JIANG Zhong-ming1, 2, SHI Zhao-feng1, YANG Xue1, TIAN Xiang3, XIAO Zhe-zhen1, LIU Chen-zhi1, HUANG Xiang-yi1   

  1. 1. School of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Water-Sediment Sciences and Water Disaster Prevention of Hunan Province, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China
  • Received:2024-05-18 Accepted:2024-08-05 Online:2024-12-09 Published:2024-12-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178381) and the Hunan Provincial Graduate Student Research and Innovation Program in 2023 (CX20230883).

摘要: 聚合物砂浆(polymer mortar,PM)因其良好的气密性、抗裂性和变形适应性被认为是一种极具发展潜力的建造压缩空气储能(compressed air energy storage,CAES)人工硐室储气库密封层的可选材料之一。为探究聚氨酯类聚合物砂浆(polyurethane polymer mortar,PPM)与人工硐室储气库衬砌混凝土之间的黏结性能和变形适应性,采用室内试验和数值模拟方法,研究了PPM中粉料和聚合物含量以及配比变化对PPM−混凝土界面的黏结性能和变形性能的影响规律,并分析了界面的破坏特征和破坏机制。研究结果表明:PPM−混凝土界面破坏型式主要表现为界面两侧材料的分离;界面剪应力−位移关系在应力峰值前呈现两阶段近似线性变形特征,界面破坏剪切应变最大值可达11.05%;粉料和聚合物含量以及配比变化对界面黏结强度都有重要的影响,最高黏结强度约为1.21 MPa,最低平均黏结强度为0.237 MPa。PPM−混凝土界面强度和变形性能可满足CAES地下储气库的建库要求。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 人工硐室, 密封结构, PPM-混凝土界面, 黏结性能, 变形特征

Abstract: Polymer mortar (PM) is recognized as a promising material for constructing the sealing layer of man-made caverns used in compressed air energy storage (CAES) systems, owing to its excellent airtightness, crack resistance, and deformation adaptability. This paper investigates the bonding properties and deformation adaptability of polyurethane polymer mortar (PPM) with lining concrete in man-made cavern gas storage, focusing on the effects of powder, polymer content, and mixture ratio variations on the PPM-concrete interface. Additionally, the failure characteristics and mechanisms of the interface are analyzed. The results indicate that the primary failure mode of the PPM-concrete interface is material separation on both sides. The relationship between interfacial shear stress and displacement exhibits two-stage approximate linear deformation characteristics prior to the stress peak, with a maximum shear strain of 11.05% during failure. Variations in powder and polymer content, as well as mixture ratio, significantly impact the interfacial bond strength. The maximum bond strength was about 1.21 MPa, while the lowest average bond strength was 0.237 MPa. The interfacial strength and deformability of the PPM-concrete interface satisfy the requirements for underground gas storage in CAES systems.

Key words: compressed air energy storage (CAES), man-made cavern, sealing structure, polyurethane polymer mortar (PPM)- concrete interface, bonding performance, deformation characteristics

中图分类号: TV32+2
[1] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[2] 兰斌鹏, 王延平, 王卫国, 王义军, 赵跃, . 拉桩支护结构变形及工作机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 551-562.
[3] 孙冠华, 王娇, 于显杨, 易琪, 朱开源, 王章星, 耿璇, 屈杰, . 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库基本原理与分析方法研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 1-25.
[4] 贾宁, 刘顺, 王洪播. 压缩空气储能人工硐库热力耦合解析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2263-2278.
[5] 张杰, 聂如松, 黄茂桐, 谭永长, 李亚峰, . 道砟嵌入路基土三轴试验及离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1720-1730.
[6] 易琪, 孙冠华, 姚院峰, 桂本, 商浩亮, 纪文栋, . 压缩空气储能地下内衬硐库上覆岩体稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3523-3532.
[7] 蒋中明, 刘宇婷, 陆希, 杨雪, 廖峻慧, 刘琛智, 黄湘宜, 周婉芬, 石兆丰, 田湘, . 压气储能内衬硐室储气关键问题与设计要点评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3491-3509.
[8] 骆赵刚, 丁选明, 欧强, 蒋春勇, 方华强, . 土工格栅加筋珊瑚砂的强度及变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1053-1064.
[9] 苗胜军, 王辉, 杨鹏锦, 王亚欣, . 近疲劳强度循环荷载对泥质石英粉砂岩 力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2109-2119.
[10] 崔凯, 于翔鹏, 裴强强, 汪小海, 许鹏飞, . 注浆模式对土遗址裂隙修复浆−土界面 黏结性能影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1501-1511.
[11] 王爱文, 高乾书, 潘一山, . 煤层钻孔降倾-控变-耗能防冲机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1230-1244.
[12] 徐鹏飞, 邓华锋, 张恒宾, 彭萌, 李冠野, 姜桥, 陈兴周, . 不同应力水平下砂岩时滞性单轴压缩破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3041-3050.
[13] 宋宇, 刘保国, 刘浩, 孙景来, 于明圆, 任大瑞, . 基于变形与脆性特性的类岩石材料 配比正交试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2675-2684.
[14] 翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[15] 张宜虎, 邬爱清, 周火明, 王帅, 罗荣, 范雷. 悬索桥隧道锚承载能力和变形特征研究综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3576-3584.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!