岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 3555-3565.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0680

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

压气法盾构仓内气压与围岩气−液两相流相互作用模型研究

黄继辉1,秦世康2,赵昱3,陈景煦1,张浩4   

  1. 1. 福建船政交通职业学院 轨道交通学院,福建 福州 350007;2. 同济大学 土木工程学院 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092; 3. 深圳大学 极端环境绿色长寿道路工程全国重点实验室,广东 深圳 518061;4. 中建海峡建设发展有限公司,福建 福州 350015
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-31 接受日期:2024-08-21 出版日期:2024-12-09 发布日期:2024-12-04
  • 作者简介:黄继辉,男,1986年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事隧道、地下建筑工程等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: 307478086@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金面上项目(No.2022J01390);福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(No.JZ230073);福建船政交通职业学院校科教发展基金(No.Z202206004)。

Model of interaction between compressed air in the head chamber of shield tunneling and the gas-liquid two-phase flow in surrounding rock

HUANG Ji-hui1, QIN Shi-kang2, ZHAO Yu3, CHEN Jing-xu1, ZHANG Hao4   

  1. 1. School of Rail Transit, Fujian Chuanzheng Communications College, Fuzhou, Fujian 350007, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. National Key Laboratory of Green and Long-Life Road Engineering in Extreme Environment, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518061, China; 4. CSCEC Strait Construction and Development Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, Fujian 350015, China
  • Received:2024-05-31 Accepted:2024-08-21 Online:2024-12-09 Published:2024-12-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2022J01390), the Project for Young and Middle-aged Teacher’s Education Research of Fujian Province (JZ230073) and the Fujian Chuanzheng Communications College Development Fund for Science, Education, and Research (Z202206004).

摘要: 压气法盾构施工技术在水下隧道修建中具有显著优点,但缺乏理论分析模型。基于质量守恒和理想气态方程,建立了盾构土仓内气压与压缩气体进出流量关系的理论模型,通过掌子面动态气压边界,将其与考虑气−液两相流的围岩数值模型耦合,形成盾构仓内气压与围岩气−液两相流相互作用模型。基于现场数据验证了模型的有效性,分析了停机情况下压气法土仓压力影响因素,主要结论如下:土仓压力随压缩空气的注入先增大后降低并趋于平稳,空气注入速率增大,土仓压力峰值和平稳值相应增大。土仓内压缩空气可减小土仓压力波动速率和幅度,空气体积越大,效果越好;压气法宜在渗透系数较小的地层中使用,地层渗透系数越大,对压缩空气的约束能力越小,甚至出现贯通至地表的空气排出通道。渗透系数较大地层中,突然停止空气注入,可能导致土仓压力快速下降和地下水涌入,危及施工安全。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 压气法, 两相渗流, 数值模拟

Abstract: The compressed air method in shield tunneling exhibits significant advantages in underwater tunnel construction, yet it lacks a comprehensive theoretical analysis model. A theoretical model for the relationship between air pressure in the shield chamber and the inflow and outflow of compressed air is firstly established, based on the principles of mass conservation and the ideal gas law. A dynamic air pressure boundary at the tunnel face is used to integrate the theoretical model with a numerical model of the surrounding rock that considers gas-liquid two-phase flow. The model is validated through field data. Analysis of key factors affecting chamber pressure during shield shutdown reveals that chamber pressure initially increases, then decreases, and eventually stabilizes upon compressed air injection. Higher air injection rates lead to increased peak and stable chamber pressures. Compressed air within the chamber reduces the rate and amplitude of pressure fluctuations, with a larger volume of air amplifying this effect. The compressed air method is best suited for strata with low permeability. As the permeability coefficient of the stratum increases, the ability of stratum to contain compressed air decreases, leading to the formation of air discharge channels extending to the ground surface. In strata with higher permeability coefficients, abruptly halting air injection can cause a rapid drop in chamber pressure and groundwater influx, threatening construction safety.

Key words: shield tunnel, compressed air method, two-phase flow, numerical simulation

中图分类号: U45
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[4] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[5] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[6] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[7] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[8] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[9] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[10] 邓汉鑫, 武东生, 王晓光, 王东坡. 非均质孔隙介质中循环驱替对两相渗流及毛细捕获的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 505-514.
[11] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[12] 谢立夫, 关振长, 黄明, 丘华生, 许超. 考虑主动铰接的盾构-地层相互作用模型及求解研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3574-3584.
[13] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[14] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[15] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!