岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 123-132.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0520

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究

王军1, 2, 3,张凯宇1,陈晟凯1, 2, 4,秦伟1, 2, 5, 倪俊峰1, 2,高紫阳1, 2,张一帆1, 2   

  1. 1.温州大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 温州 325035;2.浙江省软弱土地基与海涂围垦工程技术重点实验室,浙江 温州 325035; 3.滨海软土地基防灾减灾技术浙江省工程研究中心,浙江 温州 325035;4.超软土工程技术与智能化监测浙江省国际科技合作基地,浙江 温州 325035; 5.温州市交通压电工程技术重点实验室,浙江 温州 325035
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-29 接受日期:2024-09-06 出版日期:2025-01-10 发布日期:2025-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 秦伟,男,1988年生,博士,副教授,主要从事深基础工程、地基处理的研究工作。E-mail:phd_w.qin@vip.163.com
  • 作者简介:王军,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学、地基处理的研究工作。E-mail:wangjunx9s@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家杰出青年科学基金项目(No.52325806);国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流(No.W2411045);浙江省自然科学基金公益技术应用研究项目(No.LGF22E080011);温州市基础性科研项目(No.S20210005);温州大学硕士研究生创新基金项目(No.3162024004129)。

Experimental study on explosive deposition depth affecting soil parameters in explosion replacement method

WANG Jun1, 2, 3, ZHANG Kai-yu1, CHEN Sheng-kai1, 2, 4, QIN Wei1, 2, 5, NI Jun-feng1, 2, GAO Zi-yang1, 2, ZHANG Yi-fang1,2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Engineering and Technology for Soft Soil Foundation and Tideland Reclamation of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China; 3. Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation for Coastal Soft Soil Foundation, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035 China; 4. Zhejiang International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Ultra-soft Soil Engineering and Smart Monitoring, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035 China; 5. Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Traffic Piezoelectric Engineering Technology, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035 China
  • Received:2024-04-29 Accepted:2024-09-06 Online:2025-01-10 Published:2025-01-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (52325806), the International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (W2411045), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project (LGF22E080011), the Wenzhou Basic Scientific Project (S20210005) and the Master’s Innovation Foundation of Wenzhou University (3162024004129).

摘要: 爆破挤淤法是厚度15 m以上的软弱土地基有效处理方法之一。为了研究炸药埋深对该方法处理效果的影响,开展了淤泥中爆破的模型试验,利用全自动十字剪切板进行了不排水抗剪强度测试,探讨了炸药埋深对淤泥的不排水抗剪强度、含水率等影响,并利用扫描电镜分别观测了不同炸药埋深下爆破前后土体的微观结构。研究结果表明:爆破会破坏爆点附近的土结构,导致孔隙率增加,不排水抗剪强度骤降,形成爆破扰动区;扰动区以外土体受到挤压导致不排水抗剪强度增加,形成爆破挤密区。爆破后土体含水率下降,爆心距越大下降越显著。炸药埋深为0.3倍淤泥厚度的爆后不排水抗剪强度减小最显著,约27%,扰动区范围最大,约为19.2 d为爆点直径),爆破效果最显著。因此,存在爆点最佳埋深,使得爆破效果最好,扰动土体的范围最大;可通过不排水抗剪强度确定爆破扰动范围。研究结果可为相关工程中炸药埋深设计提供技术支持和参考。

关键词: 爆破挤淤法, 炸药埋深, 十字板剪切试验, 不排水抗剪强度, 含水率, 孔隙比

Abstract: The explosion replacement method is an effective treatment for weak soil layers exceeding 15 m in thickness. To investigate the effect of explosive deposition depth on treatment efficacy, model tests involving silt blasting were conducted, and vane shear tests were performed using an automatic cross shear apparatus. The effects of explosive deposition depth on the undrained shear strength and water content of silt were examined. Additionally, the soil microstructure before and after blasting at various depths was observed using a scanning electron microscope. The results indicated that blasting disrupted the soil structure around the explosion point, increasing the void ratio and causing a sudden drop in undrained shear strength, thereby forming a blasting disturbance zone. The soil outside the disturbed zone was compacted, resulting in increased undrained shear strength and forming a blast-compacted zone. After blasting, soil water content decreased; the farther from the explosion center, the more significant the decrease. When the explosive deposition depth was 0.3 times the soil layer thickness, the reduction in undrained shear strength was most significant at about 27%, and the disturbed zone was largest at approximately 19.2d (where d is the explosive diameter), making the explosion most effective. Therefore, there exists an optimal deposition depth of the explosive, which makes the best explosion treatment effect and the largest range of disturbed soil. And, the range of blasting disturbance can be determined by undrained shear strength. The results of the study can provide technical support and reference for the design of explosive deposition depth in related projects.

Key words: explosion replacement method, explosive deposition depth , vane shear test, undrained shear strength, water content, void ratio

中图分类号: TU 453
[1] 王勇, 顾凯, 张博, 姜霖, 施斌, . 基于分布式温度测试和重建的浅表土体含水率反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 531-540.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 李新明, 何永飞, 谈云志, 任克彬, 张先伟, 尹松, . 不同含水率下石灰−偏高岭土改良遗址土宏微观特性的冻融循环效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2894-2906.
[4] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[5] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[6] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[7] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[8] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[9] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[10] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
[11] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[12] 郭旭辉, 朱鸿鹄, 吴冰, 高宇新, 胡乐乐, 曹鼎峰, . 基于人工神经网络的黄土含水率光纤被动感测技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 653-664.
[13] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[14] 宋二波, 姚仰平, 牛玺荣, . 基于加速度峰值的填土智能压实质量评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3054-3064.
[15] 杜金飞, 杜宇翔, 贾永胜, 孙金山, 姚颖康, 谢全民, 范焜晖, . 水−动力耦合作用下红砂岩变形破坏与能耗分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 248-258.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!