岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 3740-3756.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.00589CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.00589

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

降雨及库水位作用下碎石土岸坡变形破坏机制模型试验研究

丁军领1,吉锋1,魏松1,张波2,曾瑞1,李卓1,陆宇鹏1   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059;2. 中国铁路长江运输设计集团有限公司,重庆 401121
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-17 接受日期:2025-04-14 出版日期:2025-12-11 发布日期:2025-12-13
  • 通讯作者: 吉锋,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事重大地质灾害稳定性预测与评价方面的研究。E-mail: jeifens@163.com
  • 作者简介:丁军领,男,1999年生,博士研究生,主要从事地质灾害稳定性预测与评价方面的研究。E-mail: dingjunling@stu.cdut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41977273)。

Model test of deformation and failure mechanism of gravel soil bank slope under rainfall and reservoir water level

DING Jun-ling1, JI Feng1, WEI Song1, ZHANG Bo2, ZENG Rui1, LI Zhuo1, LU Yu-peng1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China; 2. China Railway Changjiang Transport Design Group Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401121, China
  • Received:2024-12-17 Accepted:2025-04-14 Online:2025-12-11 Published:2025-12-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41977273).

摘要: 受雨季库水调度与降雨影响,堆积体岸坡变形加剧,水库运营遭受威胁。为研究堆积体岸坡变形破坏机制及其入渗特性,以贵州省三板溪水库为背景,采用大型物理模型试验,模拟降雨及其与水位波动耦合工况,获取坡内孔隙水压力等相关参数,记录坡面变形演化与侧面湿润锋迁移全过程。结果表明:模型湿润锋最终形态由坡形所决定,不同入渗作用主要表现为迁移深度的变化,渗流场特征与坡体坡度对迁移速率影响较大;两种工况下土压力曲线变化平缓,孔隙水压力变化滞后,坡体深层土压力与孔隙水压力在饱和状态下较浅层波动幅度更大;降雨时坡面变形以侵蚀凹坑与局部滑塌为主,而耦合时则以侵蚀沟道为主,且耦合时的坡面侵蚀规模约为降雨的2倍,但二者坡脚皆出现多级滑面牵引式破坏。基于试验结果,将降雨与水位耦合下模型岸坡的变形破坏机制总结为坡面膨胀软化、坡面软化沉降、侵蚀细沟发育、侵蚀细沟扩展以及侵蚀沟道发展与坡脚垮塌5个阶段。研究成果填补了三板溪库区于上述工况下针对岸坡稳定性研究的空白,对研究类似的碎石土岸坡变形破坏及其防治具有推广作用。

关键词: 降雨与库水位, 碎石土岸坡, 模型试验, 变形破坏机制, 入渗特性

Abstract: Deformation of the deposit bank slope is intensified due to reservoir water regulation and rainfall, threatening reservoir operation. To investigate the deformation and failure mechanisms of bank slopes, as well as their infiltration characteristics, a large-scale physical model test was conducted to simulate rainfall and its interactions with water level fluctuations at the Sanbanxi Reservoir in Guizhou Province. The parameters such as pore water pressure in slope and the whole process of slope deformation evolution are obtained. The results show that: (1) The final shape of the modeled wetting front is determined by the slope shape, and the different infiltration effects are mainly manifested in the change of migration depth, and the seepage field characteristics and slope gradient have a greater influence on the migration rate. (2) The soil pressure curve changes gently under both conditions, the pore water pressure changes with a lag, and the soil pressure and pore water pressure in the deeper layers of the slope body fluctuate more than those in the shallower layers in the saturated state. (3) Slope deformation during rainfall is dominated by erosion pits and localized slides, while erosion channels dominate during coupling, and the scale of slope erosion during coupling is about twice as large as that during rainfall, but multi-stage slip traction damage occurs at the foot of the slopes in both conditions. (4) Based on the experimental results, the deformation and damage mechanism of the modeled bank slope under the coupled rainfall and water level is summarized into five stages: softening and settling of the slope surface, development and expansion of erosion gullies, and development of erosion channels and collapse at the foot of the slope. The results of this study fill the gap in the study of bank slope stability under the above conditions in Sanbanxi Reservoir area, and it is useful for the study of similar deformation damage of gravel soil bank slopes and their prevention and control.

Key words: rainfall and reservoir water level, gravel soil bank slope, model test, deformation and failure mechanism, infiltration features

中图分类号: TU457
[1] 陈树理, 郭伟, 任宇晓, 陈伟. 软土夹层地基上的互锁式L型沉箱稳定性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 49-60.
[2] 吴金标, 曾柳祁, 江益辉, 槐荣国, 曾程. 不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔抗力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[3] 贾宝新, 袁庆雷. 注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[4] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[5] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[6] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[7] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[8] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[9] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[10] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[11] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[12] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[13] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[14] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[15] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 崔明娟, 黄斌彩. 富水砂层酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀防渗加固模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3715-3726.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!