岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 3934-3943.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1202CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1202

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基桩自平衡静载试验总位移法及模拟研究

程小俊1,魏宁2,蒋睿3,宋亚亚1,何忠意1, 4   

  1. 1. 广东天信电力工程检测有限公司,广东 广州 510663;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;3. 郑州大学 水利与交通学院,河南 郑州 450001;4. 华南理工大学 海洋科学与工程学院,广东 广州 511442
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-29 接受日期:2025-07-03 出版日期:2025-12-11 发布日期:2025-12-20
  • 作者简介:程小俊,男,1979年生,硕士,高级工程师,注册岩土工程师,主要从事于地基与桩基础的检测及试验研究。E-mail: 43256332@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42276213);国家科技部重点研发专项子课题(No.2022YFC3002302)

Total displacement method of self-balanced pile static loading test and its simulation

CHENG Xiao-jun1, WEI Ning2, JIANG Rui3, SONG Ya-ya1, HE Zhong-yi1, 4   

  1. 1. Guangdong Tianxin Electric Power Engineering Testing Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510663, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China; 4. School of Marine Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511442, China
  • Received:2024-09-29 Accepted:2025-07-03 Online:2025-12-11 Published:2025-12-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42276213) and the Sub-project of the National Key R & D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2022YFC3002302).

摘要: 自平衡试桩法的传统分析方法有诸多不足之处。基于上、下段桩荷载−位移曲线,提出了自平衡静载试验总位移法。通过数值模拟进行初步分析发现,荷载箱位置偏离平衡点时,总位移法结果的偏离小于等效位移法。对多种不同位移情况的案例进行分析,结果表明总位移法得到的结果与常规方法非常一致。当上、下段桩的位移差异极大,或出现位移陡变时,用总位移法进行分析比常规方法更为合理。总位移法可解决常规方法不能将上、下段桩按整桩进行分析的问题;可解决上段桩位移小于下段桩位移时,可能无法采用等效位移法进行计算的问题;总位移法得到的荷载−位移曲线比等效位移法的曲线更完整。对文献中无法给出的极限承载力和位移,采用总位移法给出了相应的结果。此外,总位移法可以有效克服场地和外部环境扰动的影响而获得自平衡试桩法的极限承载力,该方法可为相似工程提供理论指导。

关键词: 自平衡法, 荷载-位移曲线, 位移调节, 总位移法, 相对位移

Abstract: The traditional analysis method of self-balanced pile test has many shortcomings. Based on load-displacement curves of upper and lower piles, a total displacement method of self-balanced static loading test is proposed. Preliminary numerical analyses show that, when the load-cell position deviates from equilibrium, the total-displacement method yields smaller deviations than the equivalent-displacement method. The analysis of various cases with different displacement conditions shows that the results obtained by the total displacement method are highly consistent with those of the conventional methods. When the displacement difference between the top and bottom piles is large or exhibits abrupt changes, the total-displacement method is more appropriate than the conventional method. The total displacement method can solve the problem that the conventional method cannot analyze the upper and lower piles as a whole pile. Moreover, the equivalent-displacement method may be inapplicable when the upper-section displacement is smaller than the lower-section displacement; the total-displacement method remains applicable. The load-displacement curve obtained by the total displacement method is more complete than that obtained by the equivalent displacement method. For ultimate bearing capacity and displacement values not reported in the literature, the total-displacement method provides corresponding results. In addition, the total-displacement method can effectively mitigate site- and environment-related disturbances in obtaining the ultimate bearing capacity of self-balanced pile tests, providing theoretical guidance for similar projects.

Key words: self-balanced method, load-displacement curve, displacement regulation, total displacement method, relative displacement

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 朱建民, 殷开成, 龚维明, 谢礼飞, . 中美欧自平衡静载试验标准若干问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3491-3499.
[2] 崔 强, 程永锋, 鲁先龙, 谢 枫, 孙付涛, . 强风化岩中挖孔基础抗拔试验及荷载位移曲线 模型参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4597-4604.
[3] 李永辉,朱 翔,周同和,. 桩端后注浆对大直径灌注桩影响的现场对比试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 388-396.
[4] 周佳锦,王奎华,龚晓南,张日红,严天龙,. 静钻根植竹节桩桩端承载性能试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2603-2609.
[5] 黄茂松,李 森,俞 剑, . 水平受荷桩的弹性有限元虚拟加载上限分析[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2399-2403.
[6] 张广兴,管林波. 注浆体对土钉受力特性的影响研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 135-141.
[7] 鲁先龙 ,乾增珍 ,童瑞铭 ,郑卫锋,. 戈壁地基扩底掏挖基础抗拔试验及其位移计算[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 1871-1877.
[8] 鲁先龙 ,乾增珍,崔 强,. 黄土地基掏挖扩底基础抗拔试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 647-652.
[9] 曹卫平,胡伟伟. 桩承式加筋路堤三维土拱效应试验研究[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 351-358.
[10] 付 丹 ,郭红仙 ,程晓辉 ,罗 斌 ,饶枭宇 . 预应力锚索工作应力的检测方法——拉脱法的检测机制和试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2247-2252.
[11] 唐小松 ,李典庆 ,周创兵 ,方国光. 基于Copula函数的基桩荷载-位移双曲线概率分析[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 171-178.
[12] 龚维明,于清泉,戴国亮. 越南大翁桥桩基承载性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 558-562.
[13] 戴国亮,龚维明,薛国亚,童小东. 超长钻孔灌注桩桩端后压浆效果检测[J]. , 2006, 27(5): 849-0852.
[14] 孙林柱 ,王铁成 ,杨 芳 . 超长桩承载力的灰色优化-马尔柯夫预测模型[J]. , 2006, 27(3): 423-427.
[15] 黄 俊,张顶立. 地铁暗挖隧道上覆地层大变形规律分析[J]. , 2004, 25(8): 1288-1292.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!