岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 3924-3933.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0032CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0032

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土−岩复合地层超深圆形竖井开挖变形特性案例研究

张寻龙1,曹成勇1, 2, 3,陈湘生1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 深圳大学 土木与交通工程学院,广东 深圳 518060;2. 深圳大学 极端环境岩土和隧道工程智能建养全国重点实验室,广东 深圳 518060; 3. 矿山深井建设技术国家工程研究中心,北京 100013
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-08 接受日期:2025-02-21 出版日期:2025-12-11 发布日期:2025-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 曹成勇,男,1988年生,博士,助理教授,硕士生导师,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的教学科研工作。E-mail: cy-cao@szu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张寻龙,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事圆形基坑工程研究工作。E-mail: z13978603057@outlook.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52208400,No.52090084)

Investigating deformation mechanisms of ultra-deep circular shaft excavation in soil-rock composite strata: a case study

ZHANG Xun-long1, CAO Cheng-yong1, 2, 3, CHEN Xiang-sheng1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Geotechnics and Tunnelling, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China; 3. National Engineering Research Center of Deep Shaft Construction, Beijing 100013, China
  • Received:2025-01-08 Accepted:2025-02-21 Online:2025-12-11 Published:2025-12-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52208400, 52090084).

摘要: 为揭示土−岩复合地层超深圆形竖井开挖变形特性,依托深圳机场−大亚湾城际铁路某区间竖井工程,统计开挖过程的监测数据并在数值计算中采用正交异性板单元以考虑地连墙环、竖向刚度不一的特点,对比分析了实测与模拟数据,得到了城区复杂环境下深大竖井的开挖变形、承载机制。结果表明:(1)由于复合地层、地下水位以及地面超载的不均匀分布,开挖导致地连墙出现方向相反的两种变形模式,外挤型地连墙的最大变形值为0.50‰HeHe为开挖深度),肚凸型则达到了0.55‰He;(2)工程案例表明,竖井开挖性状随着开挖深度与内径的比值 r 增大而变化,≤1.1时竖井变形为环向挤压阶段,开挖深度超过土−岩交界区域时 r >1.1,此时竖井进入椭圆变形阶段;(3)数值模拟中将地连墙环、竖向刚度折减系数分别取为0.3与0.8,计算结果与实测数据的相对差值不大于13%,最后提出了可以解释该特性的椭圆变形模式与机制。研究结果可为类似土−岩复合地层深大圆形竖井的施工安全评估提供借鉴意义。

关键词: 深大圆形竖井, 土-岩复合地层, 变形特性, 现场监测, 数值模拟

Abstract: This study investigates the deformation characteristics of ultra-deep circular shaft excavation in soil–rock composite strata, based on a shaft project for the Shenzhen Airport–Daya Bay Intercity Railway. Monitoring data collected during excavation were statistically analyzed, and orthotropic plate elements were used in the numerical model to capture differences in the circumferential and vertical stiffness of the diaphragm wall. A comparison of measured and simulated results yielded insights into the deformation and load bearing mechanisms of large diameter shafts in complex urban environments. The results indicate that: 1) Due to the uneven distribution of composite strata, groundwater levels, and surface overloads, the excavation induced two opposite deformation modes in the diaphragm wall. The maximum deformation of the “outward bulging” type diaphragm wall was 0.50‰He (where He is the excavation depth), while that of the “inward bulging” type reached 0.55‰He. 2) This case study shows that shaft deformation changes as the depth-to-diameter ratio r increases. When r ≤ 1.1, the shaft deformation is in the circumferential compression stage. When the excavation depth exceeds the soil-rock interface (r > 1.1), and the shaft enters the elliptical deformation stage. 3) In the numerical simulation, the reduction coefficients for the circumferential and vertical stiffness of the diaphragm wall were set to 0.3 and 0.8, respectively. The relative difference between the calculated results and the measured data was within 13%. Finally, an elliptical deformation mode and mechanism that can explain this behavior were proposed. The research findings provide valuable references for the safety assessment of similar large-diameter circular shaft constructions in soil-rock composite strata.

Key words: deep large-diameter circular shaft, soil-rock composite stratum, deformation characteristics, site monitoring, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU454
[1] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[2] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[3] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[4] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[7] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[8] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[9] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[10] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[11] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[12] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[13] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[14] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[15] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!