岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 497-514.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0906CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0906

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于FDEM的地下内衬硐库密封结构-衬砌分缝协同优化设计研究

孙冠华1, 2,王章星1, 2,王娇1, 2,董沂鑫3,石露1, 2,刘治军4,林姗5   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中铁工程设计咨询集团有限公司,北京 100055;4. 兰州大学 土木工程与力学学院,甘肃 兰州 730000; 5. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-24 接受日期:2026-01-04 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 王娇,女,1998年生,博士,主要从事压缩空气储能地下工程、边坡工程等方面的研究工作。E-mail: wangjiao191@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:孙冠华,男,1982年生,博士,研究员,主要从事岩石力学与深地储能等方面的研究工作。E-mail: ghsun@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52508463);湖北省自然科学基金重点项目(三峡创新发展联合基金)(No. 2024AFD361);岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室前沿科学和关键技术“揭榜挂帅”项目(No. SKLGME-JBGS2404);中国五矿集团有限公司科技专项计划“揭榜挂帅”项目(No. 2025ZXA04)。

FDEM-based collaborative optimization of sealing structure and lining preset joint design in underground lined rock caverns

SUN Guan-hua1, 2, WANG Zhang-xing1, 2, WANG Jiao1, 2, DONG Yi-Xin3, SHI Lu1, 2, LIU Zhi-jun4, LIN Shan5   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. China Railway Engineering Consulting Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100055, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 5. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2025-08-24 Accepted:2026-01-04 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52508463), the Key Program of Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Three Gorges Innovation Development Joint Fund) (2024AFD361), the Frontier Science and Key Technologies “Open Bidding for Selecting the Best Candidates” Project of the National Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Engineering Safety, Chinese Academy of Sciences (SKLGME-JBGS2404) and the Science and Technology Special Program “Open Bidding for Selecting the Best Candidates” Project of China Minmetals Corporation (2025ZXA04).

摘要: 在高内压循环作用下地下储气库衬砌易产生裂缝与渗透通道,密封层受力与裂缝控制问题尤为关键。基于有限-离散元方法(finite-discrete element method,简称FDEM),建立了连续-非连续的围岩-衬砌-密封层整体模型,系统研究了平钢板与波拱两类钢衬及预设缝设计参数对衬砌裂缝演化与密封性能的影响。结果表明,平钢板型密封层应力水平和裂缝数量较高,整体性差,预设缝改善衬砌开裂与密封结构受力作用有限;波拱型结构能显著降低峰值应力并改变裂缝分布,使得裂缝多集中在波拱底部,整体裂缝数量减少,但波拱处的裂缝开裂宽度更大。采用波拱+预设缝相结合的方案可进一步均匀化开裂,减少密封钢衬应力。随着波拱和预设缝数量增加,应力分布趋于均匀,裂缝扩展受控,但最大裂缝宽度呈先减后增趋势,钢衬应力模式由拉应力向弯-剪应力转变。当缝设于拱底时,裂缝可沿预设路径均匀扩展,并可结合防排水措施降低渗透风险。总体而言,波拱+预设缝复合设计在引导裂缝、释放应变和提升密封渗透性能方面具有显著优势,为储气库密封-衬砌协同优化设计提供参考。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 内衬硐库, 密封层设计, 衬砌分缝设计, 有限-离散元方法

Abstract: Underground lined rock caverns (LRCs) used for compressed air energy storage are highly susceptible to cracking and the development of leakage pathways under cyclic high-pressure loading. Therefore, sealing performance and crack control are critical design challenges. This study employs the finite-discrete element method (FDEM) to develop an integrated rock-lining-sealing layer model, to systematically compare flat steel plate and wave-arch liners, as well as to analyze the influence of preset joint design parameters on crack evolution and sealing behavior. The results indicate that flat steel plate liners exhibit elevated stress levels, numerous cracks, and poor structural integrity, while preset joints provide only limited mitigation. In contrast, wave-arch liners significantly reduce peak stress and redistribute cracking, concentrating damage beneath arches, thereby lowering crack density, albeit with locally larger crack widths. A combined wave-arch and preset joint design further uniform crack propagation and alleviates liner stress. Increasing the number of wave arches and preset joints improves stress uniformity and crack control. However, the maximum crack width exhibits a “decrease-increase” trend, accompanied by a transition in liner stress mode from tension-dominated to bending-shear dominated behavior. When joints are placed at arch bottoms, cracks develop uniformly along the preset paths; when combined with waterproofing and drainage measures, leakage risks can be effectively managed. Overall, the wave-arch and preset joint composite design offers notable advantages in guiding crack development, releasing strain, and enhancing sealing reliability, providing a robust reference for coordinated optimization of sealing and lining design in underground LRCs.

Key words: compressed air energy storage (CAES), lined rock cavern (LRC), sealing layer design, lining preset joint design, finite- discrete element method (FDEM)

中图分类号: TU 93
[1] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[2] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[3] 张国华, 相月, 张世殊, 王薪锦, 郭辉, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能硐库运行全过程围岩弹塑性变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[4] 黄浚鸣, 赵向阳, 马洪岭, 王磊, 张佳敏. 盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[5] 孙冠华, 耿璇, 姜长飞, 石露, 张金涛, 江巍. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库围岩破坏区解析模型及演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
[6] 谢传金, 罗红梅, 白冰, 李继岩, 杨横涛, 郑文召. 含水层压缩空气储能空间封闭性评价:理论与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[7] 胡港, 芮瑞, 江强强, 王永平, 张文涛. 压缩空气储能隧道式硬岩储气硐起裂角与起裂压力二维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[8] 刘顺, 程昊德, 贾宁, 王洪播, 尹宏磊. 压缩空气储能隧道式地下内衬硐库的伯努利管温控方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[9] 曹校勇, 关少钰, 叶欣欣. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬储气洞室群上覆岩体稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[10] 张国华, 郭辉, 张世殊, 周芝仪, 相月, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能地下储气库椭圆形断面最佳轴比及运行压力区间确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[11] 程昊德, 贾宁, 刘顺, 聂会建, 梁昊. 压缩空气储能人工硐库多层密封结构热传递算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[12] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[13] 孙冠华, 王娇, 于显杨, 易琪, 朱开源, 王章星, 耿璇, 屈杰, . 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库基本原理与分析方法研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 1-25.
[14] 贾宁, 刘顺, 王洪播. 压缩空气储能人工硐库热力耦合解析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2263-2278.
[15] 蒋中明, 石兆丰, 杨雪, 田湘, 肖喆臻, 刘琛智, 黄湘宜, . 聚氨酯类聚合物砂浆−混凝土界面黏结性能与变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3545-3554.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!