Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 3117-3129.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0242

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Optimization of design parameters for support scheme of a high compression cushioning layer in a diversion tunnel

SHU Xiao-yun1, 2, TIAN Hong-ming1, CHEN Wei-zhong1, ZHU Zhen-de2, YANG Fan4, TIAN Yun3, ZHANG Chao-xuan1, ZHANG Tao1,   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics and Geohazards of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China; 4. Zhongshui North Survey, Design and Research Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300222, China
  • Received:2024-02-29 Accepted:2024-06-03 Online:2024-10-09 Published:2024-10-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Major Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (42293355), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52179113, 52279119, U2340229, 42207199), the Postdoctoral Scientific Research Project (ZJ2022155, GZC20240167), the Foundation of Huzhou Key Laboratory (HGB23E002) and the Knowledge Innovation Program of Wuhan-Basic Research (20220108010163).

Abstract: Soft rock tunnel surrounding rock deformation exhibits significant time-dependent characteristics, potentially causing cracking and damage of tunnel linings during operation. This study focuses on a highly deformable mudstone section in a water diversion tunnel in Xinjiang, and proposes a support scheme with a high compression cushioning layer between initial support and secondary lining to ensure the long-term safety of the tunnel. The existing cushioning layer support scheme was initially subjected to on-site monitoring and structural forces analysis. Subsequently, numerical simulation methods were used to optimize the cushioning layer support parameters. Finally, the optimized and original schemes were compared to analyse their respective support effects. (1) Monitoring of the existing support scheme reveals that, with the installation of a 5 cm polyethylene cushioning layer at a density of 90–100 kg/m3, the surrounding rock pressure reaches 0.36 MPa, indicating the compression phase of the cushioning layer. The non-uniformity of lining force is evident, suggesting potential for optimizing the cushioning layer material and thickness. (2) Optimization of cushioning layer support parameters indicates that if the stress of buffer layer platform is too high, it cannot fully absorb energy, and if too low, it cannot effectively limit surrounding rock deformation. Both scenarios result in insufficient energy absorption and low lining safety. Increasing the cushioning layer thickness gradually reduces lining damage degree, but the reduction rate diminishes over time. For this project, the optimal cushioning layer support is achieved with a platform stress of 0.5 MPa, a compression ratio of ≥0.6, and a thickness of 10 cm. (3) Comparative analysis indicates that the optimized cushioning layer support reduces the maximum principal stress on the secondary lining by 20%–30% compared to the original scheme, alleviating stress concentration in the lining and ensuring the long-term stability of the tunnel support structure.

Key words: time-dependent deformation, tunnel support, cushioning layer, numerical simulation, parameter optimization

CLC Number: 

  • TE 93
[1] SUN Zhi-liang, SHAO Min, WANG Ye-chen-zi, LIU Zhong, REN Wei-zhong, BAI Wei, LI Peng, . Mesoscopic simulation and analysis of influencing factors for ground subsidence induced by leakage through pipeline defect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] LI Bin, SHEN Hai-meng, LI Qi, LI Xia-ying, . A numerical simulation of dynamic evolution of permeability during granite shear process under different confining pressures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[3] ZHANG Qi, WANG Ju, LIU Jiang-feng, CAO Sheng-fei, XIE Jing-li, CHENG Jian-feng, . Core disposal elements spacing design for high-level radioactive waste repository under coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[4] LIANG Qing-guo, LI Jing, ZHANG Chong-hui, LIU Tong-tong, SUN Zhi-tao, . Mechanical response of tunnel lining in loess-mudstone composite strata under uniform expansion of foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] ZHU Xian-xiang, ZHANG Qi, MA Jun-peng, WANG Yong-jun, MENG Fan-zhen, . Diffusion mechanism of seepage grouting in water-bearing sand layer under slurry-water replacement effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[6] YANG Ming-yun, CHEN Chuan, LAI Ying, CHEN Yun-min. Bearing capacity analysis of piggy-backed anchors under three-dimensional loading in clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[7] ZHANG Ling-bo, SUN Yi-song, CHENG Xing-lei, GUO Qun-lu, ZHAO Chuan, LIU Jing-hong. Characterization method for the three-dimensional soil cutting failure surface based on damage energy dissipation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[8] ZHANG Xin-ye, LIU Zhi-wei, WENG Xiao-lin, LI Xuan-cong, ZHAO Jian-chong, LIU Xiao-guang. Stability and failure mode analysis of tunnel face in composite ground with upper sand and lower clay layers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[9] WU Di, CHEN Rong, KONG Gang-qiang, NIU Geng, MIAO Yu-song, WANG Zhen-xing. Field test and numerical simulation on thermo-mechanical response characteristics of a bridge energy row pile under heating-cooling cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[10] XU Guo-qing, HUANG Gao-xiang, WANG Xie-kang, LUO Deng-ze, LI Hong-tao, YAO Qiang, . Rock cracking and evolution mechanism under the action of new type of arc-shaped charge blasting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[11] WANG Shuai, WANG Yu-hui, WANG Ling, LI Jia-qi, ZHAO Zi-hao, PANG Kai-xuan, . Influence mechanism of rock pore structure and mineral composition on crack propagation based on grain based model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[12] YANG Li. Numerical analysis and bearing capacity determination criteria of field plate loading tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[13] ZHAO Yang, LU Zheng, YAN Ting-zhou, LI Jian, TANG Chu-xuan, QIU Yu, YAO Hai-lin, . Vibration compaction behaviors and prestressing effect of geocell-reinforced subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
[14] XUE Xiu-li, XIE Wei-rui, LIAO Huan, ZENG Chao-feng, CHEN Hong-bo, XU Chang-jie, HAN Lei, . Barrier effect of adjacent deep-buried metro station and its influence on ground settlement induced by foundation pit dewatering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[15] LÜ Mao-lin, ZHU Zhen-de, ZHOU Lu-ming, GE Xin-liang, . Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in rock masses with pre-existing double fractures using the phase field method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!