Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1829-1835.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1078

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Calculation of active earth pressure of cohesive soil behind retaining wall considering soil tensile strength

CHEN Jian-gong1, 2, 3, YANG Yang1, CHEN Yan-han1, CHEN Xiao-bing1   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. National Joint Engineering Research Center of Geohazards Prevention in the Reservoir Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
  • Received:2019-06-18 Revised:2019-11-26 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-07-31
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(51638002).

Abstract: When cohesive soil behind a retaining wall is in active earth pressure state, cracks will appear behind the top of the retaining wall, which leads to a wide region of zero pressure, namely cracking depth. The problem of the cracking depth behind a retaining wall has not been solved well. In this study, an example is taken to illustrate that cracks can appear on the surface of filling, because the cracks are not taken into account in the variational method that is used to solve the active soil pressure of cohesive soil behind the retaining wall. The Mohr-Coulomb strength envelope is simplified by a broken line and the calculation formula of the cracking depth of the soil behind the wall is derived by the actual soil tensile strength. According to the stress boundary state and geometric boundary conditions of the upper points on the slip surface, the variational method to calculate the active earth pressure variation has been improved, and the uncertainly model of the active earth pressure is transformed into a deterministic issue. Also, the influence of internal friction angle, cohesion and tensile strength on the crack depth is analyzed. With the increase of internal friction angle and cohesion, the crack depth of soil increases and the soil pressure gradually decreases, and the slip surface shifts towards the wall back. With the increase of the tensile strength of the soil, the cracking depth and the soil pressure both gradually decrease. When the tensile strength is strong enough to resist the tension destruction of the soil, the cracking depth of the soil behind the wall becomes zero, and the soil pressure is no longer affected by the tensile strength.

Key words: retaining wall, active earth pressure, variational method, cracking depth, cohesive soil

CLC Number: 

  • TU432
[1] PAN Shen-xin, JIANG Guan-lu, YUAN Sheng-yang, LIU Xian-feng, HE Zi-lei, CAO Li-jun, ZHOU Shi-guang, . Service performance of reinforced soil retaining wall with integral rigid facing of high-speed railway under seismic action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[2] HU Wei, ZENG Pan-yu, WANG Hui, LIU Shun-kai, CHEN Qiu-nan, PUIG DAMIANS I, . Calculation method of uplift capacity of horizontal strip anchor plate in cohesive soil foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1731-1744.
[3] PEI Yuan-yuan, LONG Jian-hui, GUO Shi-yi, AN Cheng-ji, WENG Hang-yu, ZHANG Ji-ning, . Model test study on stress-strain characteristics of angled reinforced soil retaining wall under different loads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[4] YAO Jia-nan, XU Chang-jie, CHI Min-liang, WANG Yan-ping, XI Yue-lai, WANG Wei-feng, FENG Guo-hui, SUN Jia-zheng, . Discrete element simulation and theoretical study on non-limit active earth pressure of rigid retaining wall under RBT mode [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[5] CAI Xiao-guang, XU Hong-lu, WANG Hai-yun, LI Si-han, LI Ying, . Horizontal seismic coefficient of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.
[6] ZHANG Zhen-guang, XU Jie, LI Hai-xiang, . A slip line solution of active earth pressure against shafts in unsaturated soils considering the intermediate principal stress [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[7] XIAO Jin-qing, WEN Song-cheng, GUO Yuan, . Experimental study on clay erodibility and its anisotropy using hole erosion test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 187-198.
[8] YI Shun, CHEN Jian, PAN Jia-jun, WANG Yan-li, XU Han, LIU Chun-peng, . Study on characterization function of horizontal deformation for retaining wall of braced excavation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 568-578.
[9] WANG Chang-hong, WEI Yong-qing, ZHANG Hai-dong, LI Fei. Thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling model of frost heave during horizontal freezing under subway station [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2775-2785.
[10] PENG Jun-guo, HUANG Yu-hao. A new calculation method for the size of anchor plates in unsaturated slope [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1003-1013.
[11] GUI Yue, XIE Zheng-peng, GAO Yu-feng, . Influence and mechanism of organic matter on thermal conductivity of clay soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 154-162.
[12] ZOU Wei-lie, FAN Ke-wei, ZHANG Pan, HAN Zhong, . Analysis of lateral pressures on expansive soil retaining wall with expanded polystyrene geofoam inclusions and influence factors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(9): 2537-2544.
[13] ZHANG Chang-guang, GUAN Gang-hui, LI Hai-xiang, FAN Jia-shen, SHI Jing, . Seismic active earth pressure on a retaining wall in unsaturated soils with cracks for changing water table [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1575-1584.
[14] WANG Jia-quan, ZHONG Wen-tao, HUANG Shi-bin, TANG Yi, . Experimental study on static and dynamic performances of modular reinforced earth retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(5): 1435-1444.
[15] WANG Li-yan, JI Wen-wei, TAO Yun-xiang, TANG Yue, WANG Bing-hui, CAI Xiao-guang, ZHANG Lei, . Experimental study on seismic performances of geogrid striped-reinforced waste tire-faced retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 931-940.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!