Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 179-186.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0658

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental study on seismic behaviour of reinforced soil flexible abutment composite structures

XU Chao, LUO Min-min, REN Fei-fan, SHEN Pan-pan, YANG Zi-fan   

  1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2019-04-10 Revised:2019-09-11 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology(2016YFE0105800).

Abstract: Geosynthetics reinforced soil flexible abutment composite structure, as a new technology, can realise the integrated design and construction for bridges. However, the literature on the seismic performance of this structure is very limited. This paper is to study the seismic performance of a scaled model of geosynthetic reinforced soil abutment structure by the shaking table test. Experimental results showed that the geosynthetic reinforced soil abutment structure had excellent seismic performance, which could maintain great global stability under strong earthquakes until the peak ground acceleration reached 1.0g. There was only a small camber deformation found at the top of the abutment, and the maximum deformation was around 2% of the abutment height. The slight differential settlement was also observed at the bridgehead. Due to the directionality and asymmetry of the seismic excitation, the inertial forces pointing to the free surface of the abutments on both sides were different. The bridge beam could transfer and coordinate the inertial forces of the nearby reinforced soil and made it approximately equal. In addition, reducing the reinforcement spacing was beneficial to improving the seismic performance of the geosynthetic reinforced soil abutment, which was mainly manifested in minimising the structural deformation and distributing the axial forces of reinforcements.

Key words: reinforced soil, geosynthetic reinforced soil(GRS), flexible abutment, shaking table test, seismic performance

CLC Number: 

  • TU 411.93
[1] PAN Shen-xin, JIANG Guan-lu, YUAN Sheng-yang, LIU Xian-feng, HE Zi-lei, CAO Li-jun, ZHOU Shi-guang, . Service performance of reinforced soil retaining wall with integral rigid facing of high-speed railway under seismic action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[2] MA Bin, WANG Li-yan, JI Wen-wei, WU Han, CAI Xiao-guang, WANG Bin-hui, . Experimental study of seismic performances of geogrid-wrapped tire-faced retaining soil walls under strong earthquakes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2792-2804.
[3] LIU Hong-shuai, YANG Jian-sheng, SONG Dong-song, SUN Qiang-qiang, . Centrifuge modeling on ground response of dry sand site under near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[4] ZHOU Wen-qiang, JIANG Liang-wei, LUO Qiang, XIAO Zhuo-qi, LUO Yi-lian, WEI Ming, . Shaking table test on seismic performance of anchoring frame beam with flexible external anchor heads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[5] DONG Jian-hua, YANG Bo, TIAN Wen-tong, WU Xiao-lei, HE Peng-fei, ZHAO Lü-hua, LIAN Bo, . Research and development of novel anti-slide pile to prevent liquefaction and shaking table model test of seismic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[6] PEI Yuan-yuan, LONG Jian-hui, GUO Shi-yi, AN Cheng-ji, WENG Hang-yu, ZHANG Ji-ning, . Model test study on stress-strain characteristics of angled reinforced soil retaining wall under different loads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[7] CAI Xiao-guang, XU Hong-lu, WANG Hai-yun, LI Si-han, LI Ying, . Horizontal seismic coefficient of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.
[8] YANG Yao-hui, XIN Gong-feng, CHEN Yu-min, LI Zhao-feng, . Shaking table test on drainage pile-net composite foundation treated liquefiable subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[9] MA Jian-xun, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, PANG Pan-wang, LI Wen-xiao, YAN Hong-xiang. Effects of basement stories on seismic response of high-rise buildings considering soil-structure interaction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[10] XIE Zhou-zhou, ZHAO Lian-heng, LI Liang, HUANG Dong-liang, ZHANG Zi-jian, ZHOU Jing, . Difference of dynamic responses of soil-rock mixture slopes with different rock contents based on shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[11] LI Fu-xiu, GUO Wen-hao, ZHENG Ye-wei. Shaking table test of the back-to-back reinforced soil walls with full-height rigid facing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[12] HE Zi-lei, JIANG Guan-lu, FENG Hai-zhou, PAN Shen-xin, HE Xiao-long, LI Jie, . Dynamic response characteristics of bedrock and overburden layer slope supported by a combination of pile-sheet wall-anchor cables under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[13] ZHAO Chong-xi, XU Chao, WANG Qing-ming, ZHANG Sheng, LI Hao-yu, . Centrifuge load test on ultimate bearing capacity of geosynthetic-reinforced soil abutment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1643-1650.
[14] ZHU Dan, JIANG Guan-lu, CHEN Hong-yu, ZHAO Xin-hui, HUANG De-gui, LIU Yi-fu, . Shaking table experimental study on the dynamic response characteristics of single and double-row pile-supported road graben slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[15] TAO Zhi-gang, FENG Yu-xiang, ZHAO Yi , ZHANG Xiao-yu , HE Man-chao, LEI Xiao-tian, . Shaking table test on anti-seismic characteristics of NPR anchor cable support system for tunnel crossing faults [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!