Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 2615-2623.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2008

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Seismic incident wave separation method based on array observation and numerical verification

RUAN Bin, JI Han-wen, WANG Su-yang, HE Hong-jun, MIAO Yu   

  1. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2021-11-30 Revised:2022-05-06 Online:2022-09-12 Published:2022-09-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51908237, 51978304, 52008184), the Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (2021T140237) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2020kfyXJJS114).

Abstract: The accurate input of bedrock ground motion has a significant impact on the rationality of the evaluation results of seismic effect characteristics in complex sites. The restart-iteration method is used to separate the incident wave from the downgoing wave contained in the bedrock observation record, and the incident wave is converted into the equivalent nodal force and viscoelastic boundary as the input form and the bedrock boundary condition. The seismic incident wave separation method is proposed which can be used in the site numerical simulation analysis. The IKRH01 array of KiK-NET strong earthquake observation network in Japan is used for numerical verification, and the method is compared with the existing direct nodal force input method and acceleration input method, and the site amplification effect is analyzed from the frequency domain by surface-to-borehole spectral ratio method. The results show that: 1) The incident wave separation method can separate the incident wave at the bedrock of the array and achieve accurate input of ground motion. 2) The spectral ratio obtained by the method of incident wave separation is in good agreement with the peaks of order 2−6 observed by the array, indicating that the method can effectively simulate the seismic site response. 3) By comparing the spectrum ratio of downgoing wave with or without consideration, it is found that the surface-to-borehole spectral ratio within 0−10 Hz is mainly affected by downgoing wave interference, and the site amplification effect caused by incident wave is not significant.

Key words: incident wave separation, site response simulation, site effect, array observation, numerical simulation

CLC Number: 

  • TU452,P631
[1] LI Bin, SHEN Hai-meng, LI Qi, LI Xia-ying, . A numerical simulation of dynamic evolution of permeability during granite shear process under different confining pressures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[2] SUN Zhi-liang, SHAO Min, WANG Ye-chen-zi, LIU Zhong, REN Wei-zhong, BAI Wei, LI Peng, . Mesoscopic simulation and analysis of influencing factors for ground subsidence induced by leakage through pipeline defect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[3] ZHANG Qi, WANG Ju, LIU Jiang-feng, CAO Sheng-fei, XIE Jing-li, CHENG Jian-feng, . Core disposal elements spacing design for high-level radioactive waste repository under coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[4] ZHU Xian-xiang, ZHANG Qi, MA Jun-peng, WANG Yong-jun, MENG Fan-zhen, . Diffusion mechanism of seepage grouting in water-bearing sand layer under slurry-water replacement effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[5] LIANG Qing-guo, LI Jing, ZHANG Chong-hui, LIU Tong-tong, SUN Zhi-tao, . Mechanical response of tunnel lining in loess-mudstone composite strata under uniform expansion of foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] YANG Ming-yun, CHEN Chuan, LAI Ying, CHEN Yun-min. Bearing capacity analysis of piggy-backed anchors under three-dimensional loading in clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[7] ZHANG Ling-bo, SUN Yi-song, CHENG Xing-lei, GUO Qun-lu, ZHAO Chuan, LIU Jing-hong. Characterization method for the three-dimensional soil cutting failure surface based on damage energy dissipation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[8] ZHANG Xin-ye, LIU Zhi-wei, WENG Xiao-lin, LI Xuan-cong, ZHAO Jian-chong, LIU Xiao-guang. Stability and failure mode analysis of tunnel face in composite ground with upper sand and lower clay layers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[9] WU Di, CHEN Rong, KONG Gang-qiang, NIU Geng, MIAO Yu-song, WANG Zhen-xing. Field test and numerical simulation on thermo-mechanical response characteristics of a bridge energy row pile under heating-cooling cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[10] HE Ying, CHEN Ya, YIN Ben-chi, LIU Zhong-xian, LIU Xu, . Multi-point ground motion simulation at mountain-valley coupled sites using frequency-dependent equivalent linearization method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3280-3288.
[11] XU Guo-qing, HUANG Gao-xiang, WANG Xie-kang, LUO Deng-ze, LI Hong-tao, YAO Qiang, . Rock cracking and evolution mechanism under the action of new type of arc-shaped charge blasting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[12] WANG Shuai, WANG Yu-hui, WANG Ling, LI Jia-qi, ZHAO Zi-hao, PANG Kai-xuan, . Influence mechanism of rock pore structure and mineral composition on crack propagation based on grain based model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[13] YANG Li. Numerical analysis and bearing capacity determination criteria of field plate loading tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[14] ZHAO Yang, LU Zheng, YAN Ting-zhou, LI Jian, TANG Chu-xuan, QIU Yu, YAO Hai-lin, . Vibration compaction behaviors and prestressing effect of geocell-reinforced subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
[15] XUE Xiu-li, XIE Wei-rui, LIAO Huan, ZENG Chao-feng, CHEN Hong-bo, XU Chang-jie, HAN Lei, . Barrier effect of adjacent deep-buried metro station and its influence on ground settlement induced by foundation pit dewatering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!