Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 104-116.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0849

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Shaking table test on seismic response of stacked tunnels under three-directional earthquake wave excitation

HU Yao1, LEI Hua-yang1, 2, 3, LEI Zheng1, LIU Ying-nan1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering Simulation and Seismic Resilience of China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
  • Received:2021-06-07 Revised:2022-07-21 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-03
  • Supported by:
    The work was supported by the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (SLDRCE17-01) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0805402).

Abstract: Stacked tunnels is a complex system involving the interaction between tunnels and between tunnel and soil, and its safety will seriously affect the construction of urban rail transit. At present, the research on shaking table test of stacked tunnels focuses on horizontal parallel and cross arrangements, unidirectional and bidirectional ground motion input. This paper uses a self-designed three-dimensional laminar shear soil container to implement a shaking table model test on seismic response of vertical parallel stacked tunnels under three-directional earthquake wave excitation. Its seismic response includes the dynamic characteristics of foundation soil-stacked tunnels model system, the acceleration of foundation soil and stacked tunnels, ground settlement, the pore pressure of foundation soil, and the dynamic soil pressure and the strain of stacked tunnels. The results show that with the increase of seismic wave peak ground acceleration (PGA), the natural frequency of foundation soil-stacked tunnels model system decreases and the damping ratio increases. The gradient difference of soil acceleration and pore pressure around the stacked tunnels increases with the increase of seismic wave PGA, and the gradient difference around the upper tunnel is larger than that around the lower tunnel. The amplification effect of the foundation soil on the acceleration decreases with the increase of the seismic wave PGA. Under the action of same seismic wave, the shape of the acceleration Fourier spectrum of stacked tunnels at the same position is similar, but the amplitude increases with the increase of the seismic wave PGA. Furthermore, compared with the crown and bottom positions, the frequency range of the acceleration Fourier spectrum at the waist position becomes wider, and the peak amplitude decreases. The peak value of ground settlement decreases with the increase of seismic wave PGA, and the peak value of ground settlement in the center is obviously smaller than that on both sides of the foundation soil. The type of seismic wave has little effect on the peak value of dynamic earth pressure and strain of stacked tunnels. For the peak dynamic earth pressure, in the upper tunnel, the maximum value of the two tunnels is at the waist position, while the minimum value of upper and lower tunnels is at the bottom and crown positions, respectively. The peak strains at the both waist positions in the upper tunnel are significantly larger than those at the top and bottom positions, while the peak strain does not differ much at the four positions in lower tunnel.

Key words: shaking table test, stacked tunnels, seismic response, three-directional earthquake wave excitation

CLC Number: 

  • U451
[1] LIU Jian, XIA Yong, JIANG Quan, CHEN Tao, HE Wei-guo, FAN Guo-gang, XIONG Xian-tao, ZHENG Hong, . Surrounding rock deformation and failure characteristics of Yingliangbao hydropower station in highly tectonic region and response analysis to Luding earthquake in underground caverns [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[2] LIU Hong-shuai, YANG Jian-sheng, SONG Dong-song, SUN Qiang-qiang, . Centrifuge modeling on ground response of dry sand site under near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[3] YANG Jing-quan, ZHENG Chang-jie, DING Xuan-ming, . Seismic response of pipe piles in saturated soil to vertically incident P-waves [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[4] ZHOU Wen-qiang, JIANG Liang-wei, LUO Qiang, XIAO Zhuo-qi, LUO Yi-lian, WEI Ming, . Shaking table test on seismic performance of anchoring frame beam with flexible external anchor heads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[5] DONG Jian-hua, YANG Bo, TIAN Wen-tong, WU Xiao-lei, HE Peng-fei, ZHAO Lü-hua, LIAN Bo, . Research and development of novel anti-slide pile to prevent liquefaction and shaking table model test of seismic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[6] CAI Xiao-guang, XU Hong-lu, WANG Hai-yun, LI Si-han, LI Ying, . Horizontal seismic coefficient of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.
[7] YANG Yao-hui, XIN Gong-feng, CHEN Yu-min, LI Zhao-feng, . Shaking table test on drainage pile-net composite foundation treated liquefiable subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[8] ZHOU Huan-zhu, LIU Sheng-an, LI Bin, CHEN Wei-yun, SU Lei, ZHENG Jun-jie, ZHENG Ye-wei, . Analytical solution of seismic response of flexible joint of immersed tunnel crossing different strata [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 289-298.
[9] MA Jian-xun, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, PANG Pan-wang, LI Wen-xiao, YAN Hong-xiang. Effects of basement stories on seismic response of high-rise buildings considering soil-structure interaction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[10] XIE Zhou-zhou, ZHAO Lian-heng, LI Liang, HUANG Dong-liang, ZHANG Zi-jian, ZHOU Jing, . Difference of dynamic responses of soil-rock mixture slopes with different rock contents based on shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[11] LI Fu-xiu, GUO Wen-hao, ZHENG Ye-wei. Shaking table test of the back-to-back reinforced soil walls with full-height rigid facing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[12] HE Zi-lei, JIANG Guan-lu, FENG Hai-zhou, PAN Shen-xin, HE Xiao-long, LI Jie, . Dynamic response characteristics of bedrock and overburden layer slope supported by a combination of pile-sheet wall-anchor cables under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[13] ZHU Dan, JIANG Guan-lu, CHEN Hong-yu, ZHAO Xin-hui, HUANG De-gui, LIU Yi-fu, . Shaking table experimental study on the dynamic response characteristics of single and double-row pile-supported road graben slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[14] TAO Zhi-gang, FENG Yu-xiang, ZHAO Yi , ZHANG Xiao-yu , HE Man-chao, LEI Xiao-tian, . Shaking table test on anti-seismic characteristics of NPR anchor cable support system for tunnel crossing faults [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[15] WANG Tong, LIU Xian-feng, YUAN Sheng-yang, JIANG Guan-lu, HU Jin-shan, SHAO Zhu-jie, TIAN Shi-jun. Large-scale shaking table test on the seismic response of dip and anti-dip layered fractured structural slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!