Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 563-574.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1606

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Measured data and numerical simulation analysis of shield tunneling in sand

LUO Guan-yong1, 2, ZHONG Miao1, 2, CAO Hong1, 2, PAN Hong1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China; 2. The State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
  • Received:2021-09-21 Revised:2022-07-20 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978282), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515010583), the State Key Lab of Subtropical Building Science, South China University Of Technology (2022ZB21) and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Modern Civil Engineering Technology(2021B1212040003).

Abstract: Compared with other soil layers, the risk of shield tunneling in water-rich sand is greater, but the mechanism of sand deformation caused by shield tunneling is currently unclear. Relying on an electric power tunnel project in Guangzhou, this paper selects a typical water-rich sandy stratum section for high-frequency, close-range monitoring of stratum deformation caused by shield tunnel construction. The following understandings are obtained, which can be used as reference for similar projects. 1) In a water-rich environment, compared to in a homogeneous sand layer, in a combination of fine and coarse sands, the tunnel is more prone to seepage failure. Under this circumstance, the fine sand layer bears greater seepage force while being strongly supplied with water from the coarse sand layer, and the fine sand layer is thus very easy to be eroded or even hollowed out. 2) The ground deformation caused by uniform volume loss and local concentrated loss is quite different. In the case of uniform loss, because the arching effect is not as strong as the local loss, the disturbance range, surface settlement and horizontal displacement are all larger. The location of the maximum horizontal displacement is also closely related to the heterogeneity of the formation loss. When the formation loss is uniform, the maximum horizontal displacement on both sides of the tunnel occurs within the tunnel elevation range; but when the uneven loss (partial collapse of the tunnel top) occurs, the location of the maximum horizontal displacement will move up significantly. 3) The seepage force expands the range of stratum disturbance. 4) The stratum loss rate is severely affected by grouting. The vicinity of the tunnel is large, the ground surface is the smallest, and the soil above the tunnel tends to loosen.

Key words: shield construction, soil deformation, sand stratum, field monitor, numerical simulation

CLC Number: 

  • U455.43
[1] SUN Zhi-liang, SHAO Min, WANG Ye-chen-zi, LIU Zhong, REN Wei-zhong, BAI Wei, LI Peng, . Mesoscopic simulation and analysis of influencing factors for ground subsidence induced by leakage through pipeline defect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] LI Bin, SHEN Hai-meng, LI Qi, LI Xia-ying, . A numerical simulation of dynamic evolution of permeability during granite shear process under different confining pressures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[3] ZHANG Yu-kun, ZHANG Heng, LI Da-yong, XIANG Qian, . Influence of spudcan penetration and extraction on motion behavior and lateral bearing capacity of adjacent suction caisson [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[4] ZHANG Qi, WANG Ju, LIU Jiang-feng, CAO Sheng-fei, XIE Jing-li, CHENG Jian-feng, . Core disposal elements spacing design for high-level radioactive waste repository under coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[5] LIANG Qing-guo, LI Jing, ZHANG Chong-hui, LIU Tong-tong, SUN Zhi-tao, . Mechanical response of tunnel lining in loess-mudstone composite strata under uniform expansion of foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] ZHU Xian-xiang, ZHANG Qi, MA Jun-peng, WANG Yong-jun, MENG Fan-zhen, . Diffusion mechanism of seepage grouting in water-bearing sand layer under slurry-water replacement effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[7] ZHOU Guang-yuan, GAN Fei, ZHENG Gang, ZHOU Hai-zuo, WANG Hong, BI Jing, LIU Biao, ZHANG Yuan-yin, . Calculation method of negative skin friction for end-bearing piles based on soil deformation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[8] YANG Ming-yun, CHEN Chuan, LAI Ying, CHEN Yun-min. Bearing capacity analysis of piggy-backed anchors under three-dimensional loading in clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[9] ZHANG Ling-bo, SUN Yi-song, CHENG Xing-lei, GUO Qun-lu, ZHAO Chuan, LIU Jing-hong. Characterization method for the three-dimensional soil cutting failure surface based on damage energy dissipation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[10] ZHANG Xin-ye, LIU Zhi-wei, WENG Xiao-lin, LI Xuan-cong, ZHAO Jian-chong, LIU Xiao-guang. Stability and failure mode analysis of tunnel face in composite ground with upper sand and lower clay layers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[11] WU Di, CHEN Rong, KONG Gang-qiang, NIU Geng, MIAO Yu-song, WANG Zhen-xing. Field test and numerical simulation on thermo-mechanical response characteristics of a bridge energy row pile under heating-cooling cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[12] XU Guo-qing, HUANG Gao-xiang, WANG Xie-kang, LUO Deng-ze, LI Hong-tao, YAO Qiang, . Rock cracking and evolution mechanism under the action of new type of arc-shaped charge blasting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[13] WANG Shuai, WANG Yu-hui, WANG Ling, LI Jia-qi, ZHAO Zi-hao, PANG Kai-xuan, . Influence mechanism of rock pore structure and mineral composition on crack propagation based on grain based model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[14] YANG Li. Numerical analysis and bearing capacity determination criteria of field plate loading tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[15] ZHAO Yang, LU Zheng, YAN Ting-zhou, LI Jian, TANG Chu-xuan, QIU Yu, YAO Hai-lin, . Vibration compaction behaviors and prestressing effect of geocell-reinforced subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!