Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1789-1799.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1683

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Sinking state prediction and optimal sensor placement of super large open caissons based on LightGBM

DONG Xue-chao1, 2, GUO Ming-wei1, 2, WANG Shui-lin1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2022-10-26 Accepted:2022-12-09 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Key Projects in Transportation Industry 2019(2019-MS1-011).

Abstract: The sinking state prediction and optimal sensor placement are conducive to ensuring safe and steady sinking of open caissons and reducing monitoring costs. Based on LightGBM, a framework in the field of machine learning, a sinking state prediction model of super large open caisson is established. By using the monitoring data of the stress sensors at the bottom of the open caisson, the sinking speed of the open caisson, the height difference in the transverse direction and the height difference along the bridge direction are accurately predicted. Through the analysis of the sensor importance, the optimal sensor placement scheme that can meet the sinking state prediction accuracy is determined. The proposed sinking state prediction model and the optimal sensor placement method were applied to the super large open caisson sinking project of the main tower of Changtai Yangtze River Bridge. The results show that the model has high accuracy in predicting the sinking state of the open caisson, and the R2 of the three prediction indexes is greater than 0.94. The important sensors for predicting the sinking state are mainly concentrated in the outer circle of the open caisson and the area near the transverse and longitudinal axes. Under the condition of satisfying the prediction accuracy of sinking state, the optimal sensor placement scheme can reduce the number of sensors by 45.5%. When the numbers of sensors in the optimal sensor placement schemes are same, the proposed optimization scheme is better than the scheme based on the correlation analysis of characteristic variables in terms of overall accuracy of sinking state prediction.

Key words: super large open caisson, sinking state prediction, optimal sensor placement, LightGBM, machine learning, feature importance

CLC Number: 

  • U446.2
[1] JIANG Xiao-tong, ZHANG Xi-wen, LÜ Ying-hui, LI Ren-jie, JIANG Hao, . Current applications and future prospects of machine learning in geotechnical engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[2] CAI Qi-hang, DONG Xue-chao, GUO Ming-wei, LU Zheng, XU An, JIANG Fan, . Intelligent prediction of sinking of super-large anchorage caisson foundation based on soil pressure at cutting edges [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[3] ZHEN Jia-jie, LAI Feng-wen, HUANG Ming, LIAO Qing-xiang, LI Shuang, DUAN Yue-qiang. Intelligent geological condition recognition in shield tunneling via time-series clustering and online learning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[4] HE Long-ping, YAO Nan, WANG Qi-hu, YE Yi-cheng, LING Ji-suo, . Rock burst intensity grading prediction model based on automatic machine learning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[5] LONG Xiao, SUN Rui, ZHENG Tong, . Convolutional neural network-based liquefaction prediction model and interpretability analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[6] YANG Yang, WEI Yi-tong. A new method of liquefaction probability level evaluation based on classification tree [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[7] DENG Zhi-xing, XIE Kang, LI Tai-feng, WANG Wu-bin, HAO Zhe-rui, LI Jia-shen, . A novel method for quality control of vibratory compaction in high-speed railway graded aggregates based on the embedded locking point of coarse particles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[8] PAN Qiu-jing, WU Hong-tao, ZHANG Zi-long, SONG Ke-zhi, . Prediction of tunneling-induced ground surface settlement within composite strata using multi-physics-informed neural network [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[9] JIANG Ming-jing, ZHANG Lu-feng, HAN Liang, JIANG Peng-ming, . Damage law of structured sand using symbolic regression algorithm [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3768-3778.
[10] WU Shuang-shuang, HU Xin-li, SUN Shao-rui, WEI Ji-hong, . A case study of mechanism for intermittent deformation and early warning of landslides [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 593-602.
[11] YU Hong, CHEN Xiao-bin, YI Li-qin, QIU Jun, GU Zheng-hao, ZHAO Hui, . Parameter inversion and application of soft soil modified Cambridge model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(11): 3318-3326.
[12] ZHANG Wen-gang, GU Xin, LIU Han-long, ZHANG Qing, WANG Lin, WANG Lu-qi, . Probabilistic back analysis of soil parameters and displacement prediction of unsaturated slopes using Bayesian updating [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[13] SU Guo-shao, ZHANG Ke-shi, Lü Hai-bo. A cooperative optimization method based on particle swarm optimization and Gaussian process for displacement back analysis [J]. , 2011, 32(2): 510-515.
[14] XU Chong,LIU Bao-guo,LIU Kai-yun,GUO Jia-qi. Slope angle intelligent design based on Gaussian process with combinatorial kernel function [J]. , 2010, 31(3): 821-826.
[15] SU Guo-shao, SONG Yong-chun, YAN Liu-bin. Application of Gaussian process machine learning to slope stability evaluation [J]. , 2009, 30(3): 675-679.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!