Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 284-301.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1822

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Current situation and prospects of 2.5D finite element method for the analysis of dynamic response of railway subgrade

WANG Rui, HU Zhi-ping   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China
  • Received:2022-11-22 Accepted:2023-01-16 Online:2024-01-10 Published:2024-01-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077248), the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province(2022JQ-435) and the Open Research of Urban Geology and Underground Space Engineering Technology Research Center of Shaanxi Province (2022KT-02).

Abstract: The 2.5D finite element method is a frequency-domain method that offers advantages such as high computing efficiency and low memory consumption. Over the past two decades, continuous improvements have been made to this method, enabling it to accurately describe the dynamic response of railway subgrades by considering complex soil constitutive relationships and geometric characteristics. Through advancements in load input methods, modeling strategies, and wave absorption boundaries, the accuracy of the 2.5D finite element method has been steadily improved. The 2D interpolation method has also been employed to enhance computational efficiency for random dynamic responses of subgrades. As a result, the 2.5D finite element method has become a commonly used approach in the study of dynamic responses of railway subgrades. To provide a comprehensive understanding of the development of the 2.5D finite element method in researching the dynamic response of railway subgrades, this paper summarizes the current development status from various perspectives, including load input, subgrade system, response output, and improvements in calculation accuracy and efficiency. The paper also addresses bottleneck problems and proposes corresponding solutions. Based on these findings, further discussions and prospects are presented regarding the algorithm’s accuracy and efficiency, as well as the research objectives and content. This paper serves as a valuable reference for future research endeavors, offering insights into the advancements of the 2.5D finite element method in studying the dynamic response of railway subgrades.

Key words: 2.5D finite element method, railway subgrade, dynamic response, modeling, absorbing boundary, 2D interpolation

CLC Number: 

  • TU435
[1] JIN Gui-xiao, LIN Shao-cong, JIANG Qi-wu, HUANG Ming, LI Xi, . Seepage mathematical model of enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation-treated sandy soil based on the Kozeny-Carman equation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[2] KE Wen-hai, YANG Wen-hai, LI Yuan, WU Lei, . Dynamic response of pile foundation in slope topography under SH wave [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[3] YANG Ming-hui, CAI Ming-hui, CHEN Bo, YANG Han, . A method for calculating horizontal impedance of a single pile considering wave-induced seabed dynamic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[4] ZHOU Jian, LIAO Xing-chuan, LIU Fu-shen, SHANG Xiao-nan, SHEN Jun-yi, . Application of convolution-based peridynamics in rapid simulation of random crack propagation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 625-639.
[5] LIU Wen-jing, DENG Hui, ZHOU Xin. Dynamic response of high steep rock slope with a double-layer ductile shear zone under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[6] LIU Yu-peng, CHANG Xin, YANG Chun-he, GUO Yin-tong, HOU Zhen-kun, LI Shuang-ming, JIA Chang-gui, . Physical simulation of high-temperature true triaxial fracturing of deep shale in south Sichuan under strike-slip stress characteristics [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3104-3116.
[7] XIE Zhou-zhou, ZHAO Lian-heng, LI Liang, HUANG Dong-liang, ZHANG Zi-jian, ZHOU Jing, . Difference of dynamic responses of soil-rock mixture slopes with different rock contents based on shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[8] LI Fu-xiu, GUO Wen-hao, ZHENG Ye-wei. Shaking table test of the back-to-back reinforced soil walls with full-height rigid facing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[9] WANG Zhi-de, SI Ying-ying, LI Jie, QIAN Meng-fan, AN Jia-xing, . Dynamic response of jointed granite under low strain rate impact load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[10] ZHU Dan, JIANG Guan-lu, CHEN Hong-yu, ZHAO Xin-hui, HUANG De-gui, LIU Yi-fu, . Shaking table experimental study on the dynamic response characteristics of single and double-row pile-supported road graben slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[11] ZHANG Bei, LI Wen-yang, BI Yan-dong, HUANG Yu, . Volume effect on flowability of debris avalanche under centrifugal-Coriolis hybrid conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1560-1569.
[12] CHEN Lei, ZHANG Qiang, JIA Chao-jun, LEI Ming-feng, HUANG Juan, HU Jing, . Centrifugal modeling and numerical simulation on stability of reservoir bank accumulation slope caused by heavy rainfall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1423-1434.
[13] ZHOU Hui-ying, LI Shu-chen, WANG Man-ling, YUAN Chao, . Stochastic three-dimensional modeling and the mechanical behavior of vesicular amygdaloidal basalts under uniaxial compression [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1214-1232.
[14] WANG Ying, ZHAO Cai-qing, WANG Hai-ping, . Dynamic response solution of lined tunnel in unsaturated soil under internal explosive loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1026-1038.
[15] HUANG Chao, QIAN Jian-gu, . Dynamic response of storage and drainage tunnel in saturated ground under water hammer [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3802-3814.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!