Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 723-730.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1195

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Numerical analysis and bearing capacity determination criteria of field plate loading tests

YANG Li   

  1. Shenzhen Building Safety and Construction Quality Testing and Appraisal Center, Guangdong, Shenzhen 518052, China
  • Received:2023-08-07 Accepted:2024-06-13 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-21

Abstract: In field plate loading tests for the ground, the recommended size specified in the Technical Code for Testing of Building Foundation Soils (JGJ 340―2015), the commonly used size, and the actual size of the foundation often differ significantly, leading to discrepancies in determining the ground bearing capacity. A finite element model was established based on the results of the field tests to validate its reliability. Subsequently, the model was utilized to study the size effect on bearing capacity and deformation of both homogeneous and double-layered soil foundations under loading plates of varying widths. Furthermore, the impact of the reaction pier employed in the field test was analyze. The results indicate that with varying widths of the loading plate, the bearing capacity of homogeneous ground undergoes gradual changes, accompanied by noticeable settlement increments. The bearing capacity of double-layered ground, with a soft upper layer and a hard lower layer, increases with the width of the loading plate, resulting in reduced settlement. The presence of the reaction pier enhances the determination of bearing capacity. In the current testing code, the bearing capacity determined by ground relative deformation shows a significant size effect when the loading plate width is limited. It is recommended to adjust the upper limit of the loading plate width from 2.0 m to 3.0 m.

Key words: field plate loading test, size effect, numerical simulation, ground bearing capacity, width correction

CLC Number: 

  • TU470
[1] SUN Zhi-liang, SHAO Min, WANG Ye-chen-zi, LIU Zhong, REN Wei-zhong, BAI Wei, LI Peng, . Mesoscopic simulation and analysis of influencing factors for ground subsidence induced by leakage through pipeline defect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] LI Bin, SHEN Hai-meng, LI Qi, LI Xia-ying, . A numerical simulation of dynamic evolution of permeability during granite shear process under different confining pressures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[3] ZHANG Qi, WANG Ju, LIU Jiang-feng, CAO Sheng-fei, XIE Jing-li, CHENG Jian-feng, . Core disposal elements spacing design for high-level radioactive waste repository under coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[4] ZHU Xian-xiang, ZHANG Qi, MA Jun-peng, WANG Yong-jun, MENG Fan-zhen, . Diffusion mechanism of seepage grouting in water-bearing sand layer under slurry-water replacement effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[5] LIANG Qing-guo, LI Jing, ZHANG Chong-hui, LIU Tong-tong, SUN Zhi-tao, . Mechanical response of tunnel lining in loess-mudstone composite strata under uniform expansion of foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] YANG Ming-yun, CHEN Chuan, LAI Ying, CHEN Yun-min. Bearing capacity analysis of piggy-backed anchors under three-dimensional loading in clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[7] ZHANG Ling-bo, SUN Yi-song, CHENG Xing-lei, GUO Qun-lu, ZHAO Chuan, LIU Jing-hong. Characterization method for the three-dimensional soil cutting failure surface based on damage energy dissipation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[8] ZHANG Xin-ye, LIU Zhi-wei, WENG Xiao-lin, LI Xuan-cong, ZHAO Jian-chong, LIU Xiao-guang. Stability and failure mode analysis of tunnel face in composite ground with upper sand and lower clay layers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[9] WU Di, CHEN Rong, KONG Gang-qiang, NIU Geng, MIAO Yu-song, WANG Zhen-xing. Field test and numerical simulation on thermo-mechanical response characteristics of a bridge energy row pile under heating-cooling cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[10] XU Guo-qing, HUANG Gao-xiang, WANG Xie-kang, LUO Deng-ze, LI Hong-tao, YAO Qiang, . Rock cracking and evolution mechanism under the action of new type of arc-shaped charge blasting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[11] WANG Shuai, WANG Yu-hui, WANG Ling, LI Jia-qi, ZHAO Zi-hao, PANG Kai-xuan, . Influence mechanism of rock pore structure and mineral composition on crack propagation based on grain based model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[12] ZHAO Yang, LU Zheng, YAN Ting-zhou, LI Jian, TANG Chu-xuan, QIU Yu, YAO Hai-lin, . Vibration compaction behaviors and prestressing effect of geocell-reinforced subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
[13] LAI Han-jiang, LIU Run-ming, CHEN Zhi-bo, CUI Ming-juan, . Effect of grain size on biocementation of sand using crude soybean urease [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 25-32.
[14] CHENG Jia-lin, ZHANG Gui-ke, DENG Shao-hui, HUANG Xi-wen, ZHOU Wei, MA Gang, . Effect of cyclic wetting-drying on the crushing strength of rockfill grains with different sizes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 95-105.
[15] XUE Xiu-li, XIE Wei-rui, LIAO Huan, ZENG Chao-feng, CHEN Hong-bo, XU Chang-jie, HAN Lei, . Barrier effect of adjacent deep-buried metro station and its influence on ground settlement induced by foundation pit dewatering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!