Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 1811-1824.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0525

• Fundamental Theory and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Mechanical response of tunnel lining in loess-mudstone composite strata under uniform expansion of foundation

LIANG Qing-guo1, LI Jing1, ZHANG Chong-hui1, LIU Tong-tong1, SUN Zhi-tao2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 2. China Jikan Research Institute of Engineering Investigations and Design, Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710000, China; 3. China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710043, China
  • Received:2024-05-01 Accepted:2024-12-22 Online:2025-06-11 Published:2025-06-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51968041), the Gansu Provincial Key Research and Development Program (25YFGA052), the Youth Science Foundation of Lanzhou Jiaotong University (2024032), the Innovation Star for Outstanding Graduate Students of Gansu Province (2025CXZX-658) and the China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Science and Technology Project (2022KY32YB-02).

Abstract: Strata structure of loess area mostly features a dualistic structure of loess and mudstone. When tunnels traverse mudstone and loess-mudstone composite strata, groundwater tends to redistribute and accumulate at the base of the inverted arch. The interaction between mudstone and water causes tunnel heave, and the lithological differences between the strata significantly affect the deformation and stress characteristics of the tunnel lining. Based on a tunnel project in Tianshui City, Gansu Province, model tests were conducted on tunnel in pure mudstone and loess-mudstone composite strata with the interface at the arch waist. Displacement was applied beneath the inverted arch to simulate the swelling effect of mudstone-water interaction. Differences in internal force, deformation, and failure characteristics of the lining under two loading conditions were investigated, and numerical simulations were conducted for comparison and verification. The differences in internal force, the deformation and failure characteristics of lining under two loading conditions were investigated, and the corresponding conditions numerical simulation was conducted for comparison and verification. The results show that: (1) Expansion deformation due to forced displacement at the model’s base can be divided into two stages: the base soil compaction stage and the equivalent transfer stage of base displacement. (2) With the elastic modulus ratio of mudstone to loess approximately 2:1, the loess stratum exhibits smaller overall stiffness, resulting in larger lining deformation and even larger heave displacement in inverted arch. The arch waist at the interface is more prone to outward expansion, with an expansion deformation of 9.2 mm, about three times that of the pure mudstone stratum. Stress concentration tends to occur at the lining section near the interface. (3) In both strata, the inverted arch and arch foot positions are prone to cracking and damage. Additionally, in the composite strata, the lining arch shoulder shows a high risk of cracking, with cracks at the arch foot tending to expand towards the arch waist. (4) Compared to pure mudstone stratum, the loess near the interface in loess-mudstone strata exerts a load release effect on the heave of inverted arch. The loess at the interface compresses and absorbs some of the heave force, thereby delaying the critical tensile failure time of the filling layer. The results can provide valuable references for theoretical analysis, design and construction of tunnels in similar composite strata.

Key words: inverted arch floor heave, interface strata, model experiment, numerical simulation

CLC Number: 

  • U25
[1] SUN Zhi-liang, SHAO Min, WANG Ye-chen-zi, LIU Zhong, REN Wei-zhong, BAI Wei, LI Peng, . Mesoscopic simulation and analysis of influencing factors for ground subsidence induced by leakage through pipeline defect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] LI Bin, SHEN Hai-meng, LI Qi, LI Xia-ying, . A numerical simulation of dynamic evolution of permeability during granite shear process under different confining pressures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[3] ZHANG Qi, WANG Ju, LIU Jiang-feng, CAO Sheng-fei, XIE Jing-li, CHENG Jian-feng, . Core disposal elements spacing design for high-level radioactive waste repository under coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[4] ZHU Xian-xiang, ZHANG Qi, MA Jun-peng, WANG Yong-jun, MENG Fan-zhen, . Diffusion mechanism of seepage grouting in water-bearing sand layer under slurry-water replacement effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[5] WU Xue-zhen, XIA Ya-xin, LI Da-yong, YOU Xian-hui, SHAN Ning-kang, XIAO Zhen-ke, CHEN Xiang, . Experiment on shear strength of inner interface of a new type stiffened deep mixed pile [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[6] YANG Ming-yun, CHEN Chuan, LAI Ying, CHEN Yun-min. Bearing capacity analysis of piggy-backed anchors under three-dimensional loading in clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[7] ZHANG Ling-bo, SUN Yi-song, CHENG Xing-lei, GUO Qun-lu, ZHAO Chuan, LIU Jing-hong. Characterization method for the three-dimensional soil cutting failure surface based on damage energy dissipation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[8] ZHANG Xin-ye, LIU Zhi-wei, WENG Xiao-lin, LI Xuan-cong, ZHAO Jian-chong, LIU Xiao-guang. Stability and failure mode analysis of tunnel face in composite ground with upper sand and lower clay layers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[9] WU Di, CHEN Rong, KONG Gang-qiang, NIU Geng, MIAO Yu-song, WANG Zhen-xing. Field test and numerical simulation on thermo-mechanical response characteristics of a bridge energy row pile under heating-cooling cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[10] XU Guo-qing, HUANG Gao-xiang, WANG Xie-kang, LUO Deng-ze, LI Hong-tao, YAO Qiang, . Rock cracking and evolution mechanism under the action of new type of arc-shaped charge blasting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[11] WANG Shuai, WANG Yu-hui, WANG Ling, LI Jia-qi, ZHAO Zi-hao, PANG Kai-xuan, . Influence mechanism of rock pore structure and mineral composition on crack propagation based on grain based model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[12] YANG Li. Numerical analysis and bearing capacity determination criteria of field plate loading tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[13] ZHAO Yang, LU Zheng, YAN Ting-zhou, LI Jian, TANG Chu-xuan, QIU Yu, YAO Hai-lin, . Vibration compaction behaviors and prestressing effect of geocell-reinforced subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
[14] XUE Xiu-li, XIE Wei-rui, LIAO Huan, ZENG Chao-feng, CHEN Hong-bo, XU Chang-jie, HAN Lei, . Barrier effect of adjacent deep-buried metro station and its influence on ground settlement induced by foundation pit dewatering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[15] LÜ Mao-lin, ZHU Zhen-de, ZHOU Lu-ming, GE Xin-liang, . Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in rock masses with pre-existing double fractures using the phase field method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!