Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 571-580.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0122

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Seismic response of pile-soil-structure in coral sand under different earthquake intensities

WU Qi1, 2, DING Xuan-ming1, 2, CHEN Zhi-xiong1, 2, CHEN Yu-min3, PENG Yu1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2019-01-22 Revised:2019-05-21 Online:2020-02-11 Published:2020-02-09
  • Contact: DING Xuan-ming, male, born in 1980, PhD, Professor, Research interest: soil mechanics, ground foundation engineering, soil dynamics, engineering vibration and environmental geotechnics. E-mail: dxmhhu@163.com E-mail: wq_cqu@l63.com
  • About author:WU Qi, male, born in 1992, PhD candidate, specializing in the earthquake liquefaction. E-mail: wq_cqu@l63.com.
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51622803, 51878103, 41831282).

Abstract: The dynamic field response to earthquake in the coral sand is affected by its special engineering properties. In order to reveal the seismic response characteristics of the pile-soil-superstructure in the coral sand site, the shaking table tests of pile groups with three-storey frame structure in coral sand under different earthquake intensities are carried out. The dynamic responses to soil and structure are analyzed and compared with those in the liquefied quartz sand of Fujian. The results show that the excess pore water pressure ratios in both coral and quartz sands are far less than 1 under 0.1g seismic intensity, demonstrating that no liquefaction occurs in both sites. However, both coral and quartz sands are liquefied under 0.2g seismic intensity, and the liquefaction degree of coral sand is less than that of quartz sand. Compared with the quartz sand site, the coral sand site still has some shear strength and stiffness after the liquefaction. The settlement, horizontal displacement and column bending moment of coral sand site under 0.1g and 0.2g seismic intensities are smaller than those of quartz sand site. The position of peak bending moment of pile foundation under different seismic intensities is not the same.

Key words: coral sand, shaking table test, pile group, dynamic response, excess pore water pressure

CLC Number: 

  • TU 47
[1] XIE Hong-li, ZHOU Zhi-jun, REN Yu-bo, TIAN Ye-qing, FAN Jing-can. Horizontal bearing performance of large-diameter prestressed reinforced concrete pipe pile group [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[2] HU Feng-hui, FANG Xiang-wei, SHEN Chun-ni, WANG Chun-yan, SHAO Sheng-jun, . Experiment on particle breakage, strength, and dilatancy of coral sand under true triaxial conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[3] CUI Ji-fei, WU Zhen-zhen, LI Lin, RAO Ping-ping, . Variable stiffness leveling of old and new pile groups considering soil creep [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1897-1906.
[4] LIU Hong-shuai, YANG Jian-sheng, SONG Dong-song, SUN Qiang-qiang, . Centrifuge modeling on ground response of dry sand site under near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[5] KE Wen-hai, YANG Wen-hai, LI Yuan, WU Lei, . Dynamic response of pile foundation in slope topography under SH wave [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[6] YANG Ming-hui, CAI Ming-hui, CHEN Bo, YANG Han, . A method for calculating horizontal impedance of a single pile considering wave-induced seabed dynamic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[7] ZHOU Wen-qiang, JIANG Liang-wei, LUO Qiang, XIAO Zhuo-qi, LUO Yi-lian, WEI Ming, . Shaking table test on seismic performance of anchoring frame beam with flexible external anchor heads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[8] YE Kun, LI Zhao-jun, CHEN Peng-fei, LI Zheng, DING Jie, LIAO Li-jian, . Calculation of asymmetric straight piles for bridge pile foundation and application of supplement pile construction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1278-1285.
[9] DONG Jian-hua, YANG Bo, TIAN Wen-tong, WU Xiao-lei, HE Peng-fei, ZHAO Lü-hua, LIAN Bo, . Research and development of novel anti-slide pile to prevent liquefaction and shaking table model test of seismic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[10] LIU Lu, LI Shuai-xue, ZHANG Xin-lei, GAO Hong-mei, WANG Zhi-hua, XIAO Yang. Experimental investigation on dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of biocemented coral sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3410-3420.
[11] QIN You, LONG Hui, WU Qi, ZHUANG Hai-yang, CHEN Guo-xing. Experimental study on threshold strain for pore pressure increase and stiffness degradation in saturated coral sand under complex stress paths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3441-3450.
[12] LIU Wen-jing, DENG Hui, ZHOU Xin. Dynamic response of high steep rock slope with a double-layer ductile shear zone under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[13] CAI Xiao-guang, XU Hong-lu, WANG Hai-yun, LI Si-han, LI Ying, . Horizontal seismic coefficient of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.
[14] WANG Biao, CHEN Xing-xin, YIN Qing-feng, GUO Li-qun, HE Ming-gao, . Pore water pressure disturbance pattern of shield docking method in soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[15] YANG Yao-hui, XIN Gong-feng, CHEN Yu-min, LI Zhao-feng, . Shaking table test on drainage pile-net composite foundation treated liquefiable subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!