Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2401-2410.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1324

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Improved equivalent response acceleration method for seismic design of underground structures

YU Hai-tao1, 2, ZHANG Zheng-wei3, LI Pan1, 4   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute (Group) Company Limited, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Shanghai Urban Construction Design & Research Institute (Group) Company Limited, Shanghai 200125, China; 4. School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215131, China
  • Received:2019-07-30 Revised:2019-12-16 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41922059, 51978431, 51678438), the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2018YFC1504305, 2018YFC0809602, 2017YFC1500703), Shanghai Rising-Star Program (17QC1400500) and Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology (18DZ1205103, 17DZ1203804, 17DZ1203402).

Abstract: The equivalent response acceleration method for transverse seismic analysis of underground structures is systematically studied in this paper. Firstly, results of the dynamic time history analysis method are set as the benchmark to evaluate the adaptability of the equivalent response acceleration method through numerical examples. Then, error sources of the equivalent response acceleration method are dissected and overcome. An improved equivalent response acceleration method is proposed by introducing the dynamic response adjustment coefficient β. Finally, the applicability of the proposed method is evaluated through numerical examples. Results show that, the results of internal forces and deformations obtained from the equivalent response acceleration method are all smaller than those from dynamic time history analysis method. Moreover, its accuracy can be improved with the increase of soil shear velocity but less affected by the buried depth. Further research finds that the error of the equivalent response acceleration method comes from the fact that, the interference effect of the underground structure on the dynamic response of the surrounding soil is ignored in the method. After improvement and optimization, the improved equivalent response acceleration method is proposed to further consider the interference effect. Compared to the traditional equivalent response acceleration method, the proposed method has a wider applicability and better calculation accuracy, which provides a novel approach for seismic design and analysis of underground structures.

Key words: underground structures, seismic design, dynamic time-history analysis method, equivalent response acceleration method, improved equivalent response acceleration method

CLC Number: 

  • TU 973+.31
[1] CAI Xiao-guang, XU Hong-lu, WANG Hai-yun, LI Si-han, LI Ying, . Horizontal seismic coefficient of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.
[2] ZHU Bin, QI Ji-lin, LI Jiang, YANG Yu-sheng, ZHANG Yi-fan, ZHAO Bo-chao, . Analysis of earthquake subsidence and key influencing factors of earth-rock dam based on seismic damage investigation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 619-630.
[3] LI Jian-fei. New approach for seismic design of 3D complex slopes reinforced with piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 275-285.
[4] FERRO Edgar, OSS Andrea, SIMEONI Lucia, . Seismic analysis of cantilever earth retaining walls embedded in dry sand by simplified approaches and finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(6): 1617-1634.
[5] ZHAO Shuang, YU Jun, LIU Xin-yuan, HU Zhong-wei. Analytical study on dynamic response of cantilever underground rigid wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(1): 152-159.
[6] QIU Yan-jia, ZHANG Hong-ru, YU Zhong-yang. A seismic design method of subway stations affected by surrounding buildings [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(5): 1443-1452.
[7] HAN Run-bo, XU Cheng-shun, DU Xiu-li, XU Zi-gang, . Optimization of model box type in quasi-static pushover test of soil-underground structure system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2): 462-470.
[8] LI Ping, ZHANG Yu-dong, BO Tao, GU Jun-ru, ZHU Sheng. Study of ground motion effect of trapezoidal valley site based on centrifuge shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[9] LUO Guan-yong, MA Ming-jun, CAO Hong, PAN Hong, . A new anti-float method for riverside underground structures: drainage corridor combined with uplift piles or uplift anchors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(11): 3730-3739.
[10] FU Xiao, JI Wen-you, ZHANG Jian-jing, CAO Li-cong, FAN Gang,. Seismic response for plane sliding of slope reinforced by anchor-chain-framed ground beams through shaking table test [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1709-1719.
[11] FU Xiao, ZHANG Jian-jing, ZHOU Li-rong,. Shaking table test of seismic response of slope reinforced by combination of anti-slide piles and multi-frame foundation beam with anchor cable [J]. , 2017, 38(2): 462-470.
[12] CAO Hong, ZHU Dong-feng, LUO Guan-yong, PAN Hong, . Study of anti-buoyancy calculation method for underground structures near riverside [J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2973-2979.
[13] LIU Yang-peng, HE Shao-hui, WANG Da-hai, LI Dan-yu. Study of surrounding rock pressure calculation of deep super-span underground structures [J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 118-124.
[14] QU Hong-lue,ZHANG Jian-jing. Research on seismic response of anti-sliding sheet pile wall by shaking table test [J]. , 2013, 34(3): 743-750.
[15] WANG Du-bo , LIU Han-long , YU Tao . Seismic risk analysis of earth-rock dam based on deformation [J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1479-1484.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!